Issue 32637: Android: set sys.platform to android (original) (raw)

Created on 2018-01-23 17:16 by vstinner, last changed 2022-04-11 14:58 by admin. This issue is now closed.

Pull Requests
URL Status Linked Edit
PR 5287 closed vstinner,2018-01-23 21:08
PR 5288 closed vstinner,2018-01-23 23:55
Messages (6)
msg310511 - (view) Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * (Python committer) Date: 2018-01-23 17:16
Currently, sys.platform and os.name are equal to 'linux' on Android. While Android uses the Linux kernel, the operating system is not a regular Linux. The libc (bionic) is very different than the regular glibc, the filesystem is organized very differently, etc. I propose to change sys.platform and os.name to 'android' when running on Android.
msg310516 - (view) Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * (Python committer) Date: 2018-01-23 17:38
Wait, os.name is 'posix' on Android. That's fine in fact. Only sys.platform should be updated.
msg310537 - (view) Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * (Python committer) Date: 2018-01-24 00:12
The idea was first discussed on python-dev: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-January/151874.html me: "It seems like sys.platform == 'android' would be more appropriate since Android is not Linux: different libc, different filesystems, etc." https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-January/151887.html Brett Cannon: "I've had a similar thought myself.".
msg310543 - (view) Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * (Python committer) Date: 2018-01-24 00:42
A similar change was proposed by pmp-p on MicroPython: https://github.com/micropython/micropython/pull/3564 His use case is to use ffi module on Android (see the PR for more information), currently ffi fails to locate libraries.
msg310594 - (view) Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * (Python committer) Date: 2018-01-24 13:37
I propose to leave MACHDEP unchanged: keep MACHDEP="linux". Can it create inconsistencies? Is it an issue in practice? My short term goal is to use sys.platform == 'android' has the reference test to check if we are running on Android.
msg318102 - (view) Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * (Python committer) Date: 2018-05-29 21:47
Sadly, I failed to find anyone to help me on this issue and I lost interest on supporting Android, so I just close the issue. Sorry.
History
Date User Action Args
2022-04-11 14:58:57 admin set github: 76818
2018-05-29 21:47:52 vstinner set status: open -> closedresolution: out of datemessages: + stage: patch review -> resolved
2018-01-31 04:24:57 xgdomingo set nosy: + xgdomingo
2018-01-25 12:38:38 xdegaye set nosy: - xdegaye
2018-01-24 13:37:33 vstinner set messages: +
2018-01-24 00:44:12 vstinner set nosy: + yan12125
2018-01-24 00:42:58 vstinner set messages: +
2018-01-24 00:38:05 vstinner set nosy: + doko
2018-01-24 00:12:46 vstinner set nosy: + brett.cannon
2018-01-24 00:12:39 vstinner set messages: +
2018-01-23 23:55:21 vstinner set pull_requests: + <pull%5Frequest5134>
2018-01-23 21:08:03 vstinner set keywords: + patchstage: patch reviewpull_requests: + <pull%5Frequest5133>
2018-01-23 19:39:08 pmpp set nosy: + pmpp
2018-01-23 17:38:53 vstinner set messages: + title: Android: set sys.platform and os.name to android -> Android: set sys.platform to android
2018-01-23 17:16:49 vstinner create