Issue34611
Created on 2018-09-08 07:21 by taketakeyyy@gmail.com, last changed 2022-04-11 14:59 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (3) |
|
|
| msg324830 - (view) |
Author: Mark Dickinson (mark.dickinson) *  |
Date: 2018-09-08 11:03 |
| @taketakeyyy: Did you mean to include information about *which* examples are inaccurate? This issue isn't really useful without that information. |
|
|
| msg324871 - (view) |
Author: Karthikeyan Singaravelan (xtreak) * |
Date: 2018-09-09 05:45 |
| I don't know if it's worth it to edit the results to return Python data structures in the linked PR. The current version is more concise and indicates the general result of the function instead of the actual return values of the function calls which is intentional. Maybe is there some example in itertools that you are referring to that has incorrect results? Thanks |
|
|
| msg324872 - (view) |
Author: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger) * |
Date: 2018-09-09 06:35 |
| I concur with Karthikeyan. The doc examples read fine as-is. They have worked well for many users for a long time. It only takes seconds of experimentation to see exactly what is returned. There is also a plain text description and a rough pure python equivalent. Marking this as not a bug. Thank you for looking at the docs, but I'm going to pass on this particular suggestion. |
|
|
| History |
|
|
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:59:05 |
admin |
set |
github: 78792 |
| 2018-09-09 06:35:46 |
rhettinger |
set |
status: open -> closedresolution: not a bugmessages: + stage: patch review -> resolved |
| 2018-09-09 05:45:27 |
xtreak |
set |
nosy: + xtreakmessages: + |
| 2018-09-09 03:56:11 |
taketakeyyy@gmail.com |
set |
keywords: + patchstage: patch reviewpull_requests: + <pull%5Frequest8573> |
| 2018-09-08 11:03:59 |
mark.dickinson |
set |
nosy: + mark.dickinsonmessages: + |
| 2018-09-08 10:33:56 |
serhiy.storchaka |
set |
assignee: docs@python -> rhettingernosy: + rhettinger |
| 2018-09-08 07:21:56 |
taketakeyyy@gmail.com |
create |
|