Issue 34687: asyncio: is it time to make ProactorEventLoop as the default event loop? (original) (raw)
This issue has been migrated to GitHub: https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/78868
classification
Title: | asyncio: is it time to make ProactorEventLoop as the default event loop? | ||
---|---|---|---|
Type: | Stage: | resolved | |
Components: | asyncio | Versions: | Python 3.8 |
process
Status: | closed | Resolution: | fixed |
---|---|---|---|
Dependencies: | Superseder: | ||
Assigned To: | Nosy List: | asvetlov, carltongibson, miss-islington, vstinner, yselivanov | |
Priority: | normal | Keywords: | patch |
Created on 2018-09-14 19:35 by vstinner, last changed 2022-04-11 14:59 by admin. This issue is now closed.
Pull Requests | |||
---|---|---|---|
URL | Status | Linked | Edit |
PR 9538 | merged | vstinner,2018-09-24 15:03 | |
PR 9623 | merged | vstinner,2018-09-28 14:49 |
Messages (9) | ||
---|---|---|
msg325391 - (view) | Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * ![]() |
Date: 2018-09-14 19:35 |
Is it time to make ProactorEventLoop as the default event loop? Since 2014, many features have been added to ProactorEventLoop (ex: SSL support) and the implementation is way more today than it was 4 years ago. Comparison of SelectorEventLoop and ProactorEventLoop on Windows: https://docs.python.org/dev/library/asyncio-platforms.html#windows | ||
msg325394 - (view) | Author: Yury Selivanov (yselivanov) * ![]() |
Date: 2018-09-14 20:13 |
I'm not sure that ProactorEventLoop is stable enough TBH :( And I wouldn't be able to be on call for Windows users to fix all bugs in ProactieEventLoop. Andrew, your thoughts on this? | ||
msg326361 - (view) | Author: Yury Selivanov (yselivanov) * ![]() |
Date: 2018-09-25 15:27 |
New changeset 6ea29c5e90dde6c240bd8e0815614b52ac307ea1 by Yury Selivanov (Victor Stinner) in branch 'master': bpo-34687: Make asynico use ProactorEventLoop by default (GH-9538) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/6ea29c5e90dde6c240bd8e0815614b52ac307ea1 | ||
msg326363 - (view) | Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * ![]() |
Date: 2018-09-25 15:31 |
Thank you for the review Yury ;-) | ||
msg326424 - (view) | Author: Andrew Svetlov (asvetlov) * ![]() |
Date: 2018-09-26 07:40 |
I think the only way to make sure that proactor event loop is stable -- starting to use it everywhere on Windows. Let's do it. | ||
msg326641 - (view) | Author: miss-islington (miss-islington) | Date: 2018-09-28 15:40 |
New changeset 37aae9dcf18753b8ffda99d1a5758a90af852464 by Miss Islington (bot) (Victor Stinner) in branch 'master': bpo-34687: Update asyncio doc for ProactorEventLoop (GH-9623) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/37aae9dcf18753b8ffda99d1a5758a90af852464 | ||
msg355210 - (view) | Author: Carlton Gibson (carltongibson) | Date: 2019-10-23 10:12 |
This change causes an issue in asgiref (and so Django) for Windows and Python 3.8. https://github.com/django/asgiref/issues/132 https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/30900 It looks as if `ProactorEventLoop` needs to check the current thread before triggering the signal... ``` File "C:\Jenkins\workspace\django-windows\database\sqlite3\label\windows\python\Python38\.env\lib\site-packages\asgiref\sync.py", line 130, in _run_event_loop File "C:\Python38\lib\asyncio\proactor_events.py", line 679, in close signal.set_wakeup_fd(-1) ValueError: set_wakeup_fd only works in main thread ``` ... but I'm not familiar with the internals here as yet. (I'm guessing I need to create a new issue?) | ||
msg355211 - (view) | Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * ![]() |
Date: 2019-10-23 10:20 |
> (I'm guessing I need to create a new issue?) Please open a new issue. | ||
msg355215 - (view) | Author: Carlton Gibson (carltongibson) | Date: 2019-10-23 12:14 |
Created: https://bugs.python.org/issue38563 Thanks! |
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2022-04-11 14:59:05 | admin | set | github: 78868 |
2019-10-23 12:14:41 | carltongibson | set | messages: + |
2019-10-23 10:20:15 | vstinner | set | messages: + |
2019-10-23 10:12:12 | carltongibson | set | nosy: + carltongibsonmessages: + |
2018-09-28 15:40:13 | miss-islington | set | nosy: + miss-islingtonmessages: + |
2018-09-28 14:49:05 | vstinner | set | pull_requests: + <pull%5Frequest9021> |
2018-09-26 07:40:56 | asvetlov | set | messages: + |
2018-09-25 15:31:18 | vstinner | set | status: open -> closedresolution: fixedmessages: + stage: patch review -> resolved |
2018-09-25 15:27:21 | yselivanov | set | messages: + |
2018-09-24 15:03:14 | vstinner | set | keywords: + patchstage: patch reviewpull_requests: + <pull%5Frequest8940> |
2018-09-14 20:13:31 | yselivanov | set | messages: + |
2018-09-14 19:35:17 | vstinner | create |