| msg109176 - (view) |
Author: anatoly techtonik (techtonik) |
Date: 2010-07-03 11:29 |
| os.execve() is said to replace current process with new program. Unfortunately, when you try to call script that contains os.execve() on windows - that script spawns background process and control is immediately returned to the calling program. Does it behave the same on Unix? Is there any way to replace current process on Windows so that references to calling parent process are not lost and it could wait for execution to complete? |
|
|
| msg109179 - (view) |
Author: Amaury Forgeot d'Arc (amaury.forgeotdarc) *  |
Date: 2010-07-03 12:16 |
| on Windows, exec() does not really replace the current process. It creates a new process (with a new pid), and exits the current one. Hence the calling program only sees that the script has terminated. I don't see any easy solution on Windows, except than using subprocess.Popen(), and exit the script when the subprocess terminates. |
|
|
| msg109182 - (view) |
Author: anatoly techtonik (techtonik) |
Date: 2010-07-03 13:07 |
| Does that mean that windows doesn't allow process replacement at all? I remember the time then game NoCD loaders were somehow able to load, patch and execute main program in their address space. |
|
|
| msg110463 - (view) |
Author: Eric V. Smith (eric.smith) * |
Date: 2010-07-16 17:10 |
| I believe it's true that Windows does not offer process replacement. I'm sure you could perform some tricks by essentially writing your own loader, but the practical answer is no. It might be worth looking into how cygwin implements exec(). |
|
|
| msg169174 - (view) |
Author: R. David Murray (r.david.murray) * |
Date: 2012-08-27 00:11 |
| This looks like the answer to the cygwin question, assuming things haven't changed: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-developers/2001-02/msg00106.html Basically, it does the same thing as Python, except that a special return code is reported by the execing process to signal to whoever created the execing process that an exec has occurred. Would it be at all useful to add such a return code? |
|
|
| msg194379 - (view) |
Author: Piotr Dobrogost (piotr.dobrogost) |
Date: 2013-08-04 14:22 |
| This is unexpected and makes people wonder what's going on. See http://stackoverflow.com/q/7004687/95735 and http://stackoverflow.com/q/7264571/95735. |
|
|
| msg221031 - (view) |
Author: Mark Lawrence (BreamoreBoy) * |
Date: 2014-06-19 21:51 |
| I've changed the nosy list according to the experts index for the os module and Windows, sorry if I've named anyone I shouldn't have. |
|
|
| msg325682 - (view) |
Author: Eryk Sun (eryksun) *  |
Date: 2018-09-18 21:03 |
| Python doesn't go out of its way to fake a cross-platform POSIX environment in Windows, complete with emulated fork and exec. I don't recommend using nt.execv[e] or the os.exec* functions in Windows. Their behavior is almost always undesired. I'd be in favor of deprecating them and eventually removing them. Use subprocess instead. |
|
|
| msg325688 - (view) |
Author: Thomas Sibley (trs) |
Date: 2018-09-18 22:17 |
| What about using _execv*() and friends, as documented at <https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/cpp/c-runtime-library/reference/execvp-wexecvp?view=vs-2017>? They appear to use the process overlay feature of _spawnv*() et al., as described at <https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/c-runtime-library/spawn-wspawn-functions?view=vs-2017> and <https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/cpp/c-runtime-library/process-and-environment-control?view=vs-2017>. |
|
|
| msg325689 - (view) |
Author: Thomas Sibley (trs) |
Date: 2018-09-18 22:27 |
| It seems like it would be very nice to provide compat if its possible with a minimum of effort. At the very least, a doc patch to os.exec*() seems warranted. I expected to find notes on platform compat in the doc and was pleasantly surprised to see the indication of Windows support! Only later did I find out that it is not meaningfully supported. :-( |
|
|
| msg325690 - (view) |
Author: Eryk Sun (eryksun) * |
Date: 2018-09-18 22:42 |
| nt.execv[e] wraps calling the C runtime _wexecv[e] function. The other os.exec* functions are in turn based on these calls. As to spawn, for Windows _P_OVERLAY just means to exit the current process. The source code is published, so you can see how simple the implementation is in ucrt\exec\spawnv.cpp: if (mode == _P_OVERLAY) { // Destroy ourselves: _exit(0); } If I recall correctly, in the early 80s, Microsoft's C runtime was used for both MS-DOS and Xenix (Unix) development. One assumes that the overlay option was actually useful in Xenix. |
|
|
| msg325692 - (view) |
Author: Thomas Sibley (trs) |
Date: 2018-09-18 22:52 |
| Thanks for taking the time to explain. I was just discovering the same myself experimentally. The MS docs I linked to seem a little misleading. orz In that case, do you think a doc patch for os.exec* adding a more nuanced take on Windows support would be considered? I'd be glad to write it. |
|
|