Robert Novotny | Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (original) (raw)
Papers by Robert Novotny
Le salut par les armes, 2011
En 1421, lors d’une diète tenue à Čáslav, les États du Royaume de Bohême déposèrent leur roi, Sig... more En 1421, lors d’une diète tenue à Čáslav, les États du Royaume de Bohême déposèrent leur roi, Sigismond de Luxembourg. Leur principal argument était que Sigismond présentait un danger pour la vraie foi chrétienne. La guerre qu’il menait contre son royaume (qu’il avait récemment acquis) en devait être la preuve. Or Sigismond, lui aussi, se présentait comme un défenseur de la foi. Il n’hésita pas à lancer une croisade afin de pacifier le pays hérétique. Il n’est dès lors pas surprenant que la d..
Von den Socken. Ein Beitrag zur Kulturgeschichte der Politik am Beispiel des Einzugs König Sigism... more Von den Socken. Ein Beitrag zur Kulturgeschichte der Politik am Beispiel des Einzugs König Sigismunds zum Konzil in Basel 1433. Mit der Edition eines Sigismundbriefes und einiger Einträge im Basler Fronfastenrechnungsbuch, in: Kaiser Sigismund (1368?1437). Zur Herrschaftspraxis eines europäischen Monarchen (Forschungen zur Kaiser- und Papstgeschichte des Mittelalters. Beihefte zu J. F. Böhmer, Regesta Imperii 31), hg. v. Karel Hruza und Alexandra Kaar, Wien/ Köln/ Weimar (Böhlau) 2012, S. 385-409.
in: Le Salut par les armes. Noblesse et défense de l’orthodoxie (XIIIe-XVIIe siècle), éd. Arianne Boltanski et Franck Mercier, Rennes 2011, p. 93-108
Dvory a rezidence ve středověku II, ed. Dana Dvořáčková-Malá, Praha 2008 (= Mediaevalia historica Bohemica, Supplementum 2), s. 215-229
The study analyses the role of the lower nobility at the court of Wenceslas IV. By comparing the ... more The study analyses the role of the lower nobility at the court of Wenceslas IV. By comparing the narrative and diplomatic sources, it reassesses the prevailing opinion on the eminent role of so called favourites at the royal court.
Dvory a rezidence ve středověku I, ed. Dana Dvořáčková-Malá, Praha 2006 (= Mediaevalia historica Bohemica, Supplementum 1), s. 145-161
As part of the establishment of the medieval division of power between the ruler and the “land no... more As part of the establishment of the medieval division of power between the ruler and the “land nobility” (“zemská šlechta”, nobles who primarily exercised their political ambitions apart from the court), unique power structures were created around each. This article explores the relationship between these structures, their different principles of operation and their different social structures. Many conflicts arose between the two groups; their causes, their courses and the way in which they were resolved is analyzed in detail here. Of the places in which these conflicts took place, most attention is given to the royal council and the “extended” court.
The competition between the court and “land nobility” for power was also reflected in various strategies that both sides tried to use to strengthen their positions. Most of the activity was on the side of the court. Rulers tried to form new court institutions that would limit the power of the “land nobility”, who, however, were successful in eliminating these institutions or turning them to their own benefit. The reasons for this were that the court was unstable and that there was a high degree of change in the ruling houses. The failure of this strategy led to efforts in the opposite direction; keeping important executive organs at an informal level, which would then prevent penetration from the landed nobility. If powers were only vaguely defined, the nobility’s demands would not have a foundation. However, even in this case the “land nobility” was able to gain an advantage. Advantageous conditions for building a court hierarchy over the long term only arrived after the first quarter of the 16th century during the rule of the Habsburgs.
Adel, Burg und Herrschaft an der „Grenze“. Österreich und Böhmen, eds. Klaus Birngruber – Christina Schmid (= Studien zur Kulturgeschichte von Oberösterreich 34), Linz 2012, s. 145–161
The study follows the relations between the Rosenbergs and the lower nobility of the South Bohemi... more The study follows the relations between the Rosenbergs and the lower nobility of the South Bohemian region, which entered the service of this powerful dynasty. Other than the analysis of the client ties, it also deals with the third exemplar of the protest document of the Bohemian nobility to Constance in 1415, which based on analogy has been determined to be an act of precisely the Rosenberg clientele.
Le salut par les armes, 2011
En 1421, lors d’une diète tenue à Čáslav, les États du Royaume de Bohême déposèrent leur roi, Sig... more En 1421, lors d’une diète tenue à Čáslav, les États du Royaume de Bohême déposèrent leur roi, Sigismond de Luxembourg. Leur principal argument était que Sigismond présentait un danger pour la vraie foi chrétienne. La guerre qu’il menait contre son royaume (qu’il avait récemment acquis) en devait être la preuve. Or Sigismond, lui aussi, se présentait comme un défenseur de la foi. Il n’hésita pas à lancer une croisade afin de pacifier le pays hérétique. Il n’est dès lors pas surprenant que la d..
Von den Socken. Ein Beitrag zur Kulturgeschichte der Politik am Beispiel des Einzugs König Sigism... more Von den Socken. Ein Beitrag zur Kulturgeschichte der Politik am Beispiel des Einzugs König Sigismunds zum Konzil in Basel 1433. Mit der Edition eines Sigismundbriefes und einiger Einträge im Basler Fronfastenrechnungsbuch, in: Kaiser Sigismund (1368?1437). Zur Herrschaftspraxis eines europäischen Monarchen (Forschungen zur Kaiser- und Papstgeschichte des Mittelalters. Beihefte zu J. F. Böhmer, Regesta Imperii 31), hg. v. Karel Hruza und Alexandra Kaar, Wien/ Köln/ Weimar (Böhlau) 2012, S. 385-409.
in: Le Salut par les armes. Noblesse et défense de l’orthodoxie (XIIIe-XVIIe siècle), éd. Arianne Boltanski et Franck Mercier, Rennes 2011, p. 93-108
Dvory a rezidence ve středověku II, ed. Dana Dvořáčková-Malá, Praha 2008 (= Mediaevalia historica Bohemica, Supplementum 2), s. 215-229
The study analyses the role of the lower nobility at the court of Wenceslas IV. By comparing the ... more The study analyses the role of the lower nobility at the court of Wenceslas IV. By comparing the narrative and diplomatic sources, it reassesses the prevailing opinion on the eminent role of so called favourites at the royal court.
Dvory a rezidence ve středověku I, ed. Dana Dvořáčková-Malá, Praha 2006 (= Mediaevalia historica Bohemica, Supplementum 1), s. 145-161
As part of the establishment of the medieval division of power between the ruler and the “land no... more As part of the establishment of the medieval division of power between the ruler and the “land nobility” (“zemská šlechta”, nobles who primarily exercised their political ambitions apart from the court), unique power structures were created around each. This article explores the relationship between these structures, their different principles of operation and their different social structures. Many conflicts arose between the two groups; their causes, their courses and the way in which they were resolved is analyzed in detail here. Of the places in which these conflicts took place, most attention is given to the royal council and the “extended” court.
The competition between the court and “land nobility” for power was also reflected in various strategies that both sides tried to use to strengthen their positions. Most of the activity was on the side of the court. Rulers tried to form new court institutions that would limit the power of the “land nobility”, who, however, were successful in eliminating these institutions or turning them to their own benefit. The reasons for this were that the court was unstable and that there was a high degree of change in the ruling houses. The failure of this strategy led to efforts in the opposite direction; keeping important executive organs at an informal level, which would then prevent penetration from the landed nobility. If powers were only vaguely defined, the nobility’s demands would not have a foundation. However, even in this case the “land nobility” was able to gain an advantage. Advantageous conditions for building a court hierarchy over the long term only arrived after the first quarter of the 16th century during the rule of the Habsburgs.
Adel, Burg und Herrschaft an der „Grenze“. Österreich und Böhmen, eds. Klaus Birngruber – Christina Schmid (= Studien zur Kulturgeschichte von Oberösterreich 34), Linz 2012, s. 145–161
The study follows the relations between the Rosenbergs and the lower nobility of the South Bohemi... more The study follows the relations between the Rosenbergs and the lower nobility of the South Bohemian region, which entered the service of this powerful dynasty. Other than the analysis of the client ties, it also deals with the third exemplar of the protest document of the Bohemian nobility to Constance in 1415, which based on analogy has been determined to be an act of precisely the Rosenberg clientele.