Giovanni Pezzulo | Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR) (original) (raw)

Papers by Giovanni Pezzulo

Research paper thumbnail of Predictive Technologies: Can Smart Tools Augment the Brain's Predictive Abilities

The ability of " looking into the future " —namely, the capacity of anticipating future states of... more The ability of " looking into the future " —namely, the capacity of anticipating future states of the environment or of the body—represents a fundamental function of human (and animal) brains. A goalkeeper who tries to guess the ball's direction; a chess player who attempts to anticipate the opponent's next move; or a man-in-love who tries to calculate what are the chances of her saying yes—in all these cases, people are simulating possible future states of the world, in order to maximize the success of their decisions or actions. Research in neuroscience is showing that our ability to predict the behavior of physical or social phenomena is largely dependent on the brain's ability to integrate current and past information to generate (probabilistic) simulations of the future. But could predictive processing be augmented using advanced technologies? In this contribution, we discuss how computational technologies may be used to support, facilitate or enhance the prediction of future events, by considering exemplificative scenarios across different domains, from simpler sensorimotor decisions to more complex cognitive tasks. We also examine the key scientific and technical challenges that must be faced to turn this vision into reality.

Research paper thumbnail of Nonparametric Problem-Space Clustering: Learning Efficient Codes for Cognitive Control Tasks

We present an information-theoretic method permitting one to find structure in a problem space (h... more We present an information-theoretic method permitting one to find structure in a problem space (here, in a spatial navigation domain) and cluster it in ways that are convenient to solve different classes of control problems, which include planning a path to a goal from a known or an unknown location, achieving multiple goals and exploring a novel environment. Our generative nonparametric approach, called the generative embedded Chinese restaurant process (geCRP), extends the family of Chinese restaurant process (CRP) models by introducing a parameterizable notion of distance (or kernel) between the states to be clustered together. By using different kernels, such as the the conditional probability or joint probability of two states, the same geCRP method clusters the environment in ways that are more sensitive to different control-related information, such as goal, sub-goal and path information. We perform a series of simulations in three scenarios—an open space, a grid world with four rooms and a maze having the same structure as the Hanoi Tower—in order to illustrate the characteristics of the different clusters (obtained using different kernels) and their relative benefits for solving planning and control problems.

Research paper thumbnail of The principles of goal-directed decisionmaking: from neural mechanisms to computation and robotics

Research paper thumbnail of The why, what, where, when and how of goal-directed choice: neuronal and computational principles

The central problems that goal-directed animals must solve are: ‘What do I need and Why, Where an... more The central problems that goal-directed animals must solve are: ‘What do I need and Why, Where and When can this be obtained, and How do I get it?’ or the H4W problem. Here, we elucidate the principles underlying the neuronal solutions to H4W using a combination of neurobiological and neurorobotic
approaches. First, we analyse H4W from a system-level perspective by mapping its objectives onto the Distributed Adaptive Control embodied cognitive architecture which sees the generation of adaptive action in the real world as the primary task of the brain rather than optimally solving abstract problems. We next map this functional decomposition to the architecture of the rodent brain to test its consistency. Following this approach, we propose that the mammalian brain solves the H4W problem on the basis of multiple kinds of outcome predictions, integrating central representations
of needs and drives (e.g. hypothalamus), valence (e.g. amygdala), world, self and task state spaces (e.g. neocortex, hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, respectively) combined with multi-modal selection (e.g. basal ganglia). In our analysis, goal-directed behaviour results from a wellstructured architecture in which goals are bootstrapped on the basis of predefined needs, valence and multiple learning, memory and planning mechanisms rather than being generated by a singular computation.

Research paper thumbnail of Anticipatory Behavior in Adaptive Learning Systems

Research paper thumbnail of Analysis of hand kinematics reveals inter‑individual differences in intertemporal decision dynamics

During intertemporal decisions, the preference for smaller, sooner reward over larger-delayed rew... more During intertemporal decisions, the preference for smaller, sooner reward over larger-delayed rewards (temporal discounting, TD) exhibits substantial inter-subject variability; however, it is currently unclear what are the mechanisms underlying this apparently idiosyncratic behavior. To answer this question, here we recorded and analyzed mouse movement kinematics during intertemporal choices in a large sample of participants (N = 86). Results revealed a specific pattern of decision dynamics associated with the selection of “immediate” versus “delayed” response alternatives, which well discriminated between a “discounter” versus a “farsighted” behavior—thus representing a reliable behavioral marker of TD preferences. By fitting the Drift Diffusion Model to the data, we showed that differences between discounter and farsighted subjects could be explained in terms of different model parameterizations, corresponding to the use of different choice mechanisms in the two groups. While farsighted subjects were biased toward the “delayed” option, discounter subjects were not correspondingly biased toward the “immediate” option. Rather, as shown by the dynamics of evidence accumulation over time, their behavior was characterized
by high choice uncertainty.

Research paper thumbnail of Interindividual Variability in Functional Connectivity as Long-Term Correlate of Temporal Discounting

During intertemporal choice (IT) future outcomes are usually devaluated as a function of the dela... more During intertemporal choice (IT) future outcomes are usually devaluated as a function of the
delay, a phenomenon known as temporal discounting (TD). Based on task-evoked activity,
previous neuroimaging studies have described several networks associated with TD. However,
given its relevance for several disorders, a critical challenge is to define a specific neural
marker able to predict TD independently of task execution. To this aim, we used restingstate
functional connectivity MRI (fcMRI) and measured TD during economic choices several
months apart in 25 human subjects.We further explored the relationship between TD, impulsivity
and decision uncertainty by collecting standard questionnaires on individual trait/
state differences. Our findings indicate that fcMRI within and between critical nodes of taskevoked
neural networks associated with TD correlates with discounting behavior measured
a long time afterwards, independently of impulsivity. Importantly, the nodes form an intrinsic
circuit that might support all the mechanisms underlying TD, from the representation of subjective
value to choice selection through modulatory effects of cognitive control and episodic prospection.

Research paper thumbnail of The role of synergies within generative models of action execution and recognition: A computational perspective

Controlling the body -given its huge number of degrees of freedom -poses severe computational cha... more Controlling the body -given its huge number of degrees of freedom -poses severe computational challenges. Mounting evidence suggests that the brain alleviates this problem by exploiting "synergies", or patterns of muscle activities (and/or movement dynamics and kinematics) that can be combined to control action, rather than controlling individual muscles of joints [1-10].

Research paper thumbnail of Studying mirror mechanisms within generative and predictive architectures for joint action

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior

Research paper thumbnail of Human sensorimotor communication: a theory of signaling in online social interactions

PloS one, 2013

Although the importance of communication is recognized in several disciplines, it is rarely studi... more Although the importance of communication is recognized in several disciplines, it is rarely studied in the context of online social interactions and joint actions. During online joint actions, language and gesture are often insufficient and humans typically use non-verbal, sensorimotor forms of communication to send coordination signals. For example, when playing volleyball, an athlete can exaggerate her movements to signal her intentions to her teammates (say, a pass to the right) or to feint an adversary. Similarly, a person who is transporting a table together with a co-actor can push the table in a certain direction to signal where and when he intends to place it. Other examples of ''signaling'' are over-articulating in noisy environments and over-emphasizing vowels in child-directed speech. In all these examples, humans intentionally modify their action kinematics to make their goals easier to disambiguate. At the moment no formal theory exists of these forms of sensorimotor communication and signaling. We present one such theory that describes signaling as a combination of a pragmatic and a communicative action, and explains how it simplifies coordination in online social interactions. We cast signaling within a ''joint action optimization'' framework in which co-actors optimize the success of their interaction and joint goals rather than only their part of the joint action. The decision of whether and how much to signal requires solving a trade-off between the costs of modifying one's behavior and the benefits in terms of interaction success. Signaling is thus an intentional strategy that supports social interactions; it acts in concert with automatic mechanisms of resonance, prediction, and imitation, especially when the context makes actions and intentions ambiguous and difficult to read. Our theory suggests that communication dynamics should be studied within theories of coordination and interaction rather than only in terms of the maximization of information transmission.

Research paper thumbnail of Consensus paper: the cerebellum's role in movement and cognition

Cerebellum (London, England), 2014

While the cerebellum's role in motor function is well recognized, the nature of its concurrent ro... more While the cerebellum's role in motor function is well recognized, the nature of its concurrent role in cognitive function remains considerably less clear. The current consensus paper gathers diverse views on a variety of important roles played by the cerebellum across a range of cognitive and emotional functions. This paper considers the cerebellum in relation to neurocognitive development, language function, working memory, executive function, and the development of cerebellar internal control models and reflects upon some of the ways in which better understanding the cerebellum's status as a “supervised learning machine” can enrich our ability to understand human function and adaptation. As all contributors agree that the cerebellum plays a role in cognition, there is also an agreement that this conclusion remains highly inferential. Many conclusions about the role of the cerebellum in cognition originate from applying known information about cerebellar contributions to the coordination and quality of movement. These inferences are based on the uniformity of the cerebellum's compositional infrastructure and its apparent modular organization. There is considerable support for this view, based upon observations of patients with pathology within the cerebellum.

Research paper thumbnail of Using Domain Information for Word Sense Disambiguation

The major goal in ITC-irst's participation at SENSEVAL-2 was to test the role of domain informati... more The major goal in ITC-irst's participation at SENSEVAL-2 was to test the role of domain information in word sense disambiguation. The underlying working hypothesis is that domain labels, such as MEDICINE, ARCHITECTURE and SPORT provide a natural way to establish semantic relations among word senses, which can be profitably used during the disambiguation process. For each task in which we participated (i.e. English all words, English 'lexical sample' and Italian 'lexical sample') a different mix of knowledge based and statistical techniques were implemented.

Research paper thumbnail of The role of domain information in Word Sense Disambiguation

Natural Language Engineering, 2002

This paper explores the role of domain information in word sense disambiguation. The underlying h... more This paper explores the role of domain information in word sense disambiguation. The underlying hypothesis is that domain labels, such as Medicine, Architecture and Sport, provide a useful way to establish semantic relations among word senses, which can be profitably used during the disambiguation process. Results obtained at the Senseval-2 initiative confirm that for a significant subset of words domain information can be used to disambiguate with a very high level of precision.

Research paper thumbnail of Why a Cognitive Trustier Performs Better: Simulating Trust-Based Contract Nets

In this paper we use a contract net protocol in order to compare various delegation strategies. W... more In this paper we use a contract net protocol in order to compare various delegation strategies. We have implemented some different agents, having a set of tasks to delegate (or to perform by themselves); the tasks are performed by the agents in a dynamic environment, that can help or worse their activity. The agent rely upon different strategies in order to choose whom to delegate. We implemented three classes of trustiers: a random trustier (who randomly chooses the trustee whom delegate the task to); a statistical trustier (who builds the trustworthiness of other agents only on the basis of their previous performances); a cognitive trustier (who builds a sophisticated and cognitively motivated trust model of the trustee, taking into account its specific features, its ability and motivational disposition, and the impact of the environment on its performance). Our experiments show the advantage of using cognitive representations.

Research paper thumbnail of Trust in information sources as a source for trust: a fuzzy approach

The aim of this paper is to show how relevant is a trust model based on beliefs and their credibi... more The aim of this paper is to show how relevant is a trust model based on beliefs and their credibility.

Research paper thumbnail of A Fuzzy Approach to a Belief-Based Trust Computation

The approaches to the trust study are various and very different each of other. In our view, just... more The approaches to the trust study are various and very different each of other. In our view, just a socio-cognitive approach to trust would be able to analyze the sub-components (the basic beliefs) on which the final decision to trust or not is taken. In this paper we show a first implementation and advance of the socio-cognitive model of trust developed in [1, 2] using the so-called Fuzzy Cognitive Maps. With this implementation we show how the different components may change and how their impact can change depending from the specific situation and from the agent personality.

Research paper thumbnail of Intentional strategies that make co-actors more predictable: the case of signaling

The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2013

Pickering & Garrod (P&G) explain dialogue dynamics in terms of forward modeling and prediction-by... more Pickering & Garrod (P&G) explain dialogue dynamics in terms of forward modeling and prediction-by-simulation mechanisms. Their theory dissolves a strict segregation between production and comprehension processes, and it links dialogue to action-based theories of joint action. We propose that the theory can also incorporate intentional strategies that increase communicative success: for example, signaling strategies that help remaining predictable and forming common ground.

Research paper thumbnail of Why do you fear the bogeyman? An embodied predictive coding model of perceptual inference

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2013

Why are we scared by nonperceptual entities such as the bogeyman, and why does the bogeyman only ... more Why are we scared by nonperceptual entities such as the bogeyman, and why does the bogeyman only visit us during the night? Why does hearing a window squeaking in the night suggest to us the unlikely idea of a thief or a killer? And why is this more likely to happen after watching a horror movie? To answer these and similar questions, we need to put mind and body together again and consider the embodied nature of perceptual and cognitive inference. Predictive coding provides a general framework for perceptual inference; I propose to extend it by including interoceptive and bodily information. The resulting embodied predictive coding inference permits one to compare alternative hypotheses (e.g., is the sound I hear generated by a thief or the wind?) using the same inferential scheme as in predictive coding, but using both sensory and interoceptive information as evidence, rather than just considering sensory events. If you hear a window squeaking in the night after watching a horror movie, you may consider plausible a very unlikely hypothesis (e.g., a thief, or even the bogeyman) because it explains both what you sense (e.g., the window squeaking in the night) and how you feel (e.g., your high heart rate). The good news is that the inference that I propose is fully rational and gives minds and bodies equal dignity. The bad news is that it also gives an embodiment to the bogeyman, and a reason to fear it.

Research paper thumbnail of Shared action spaces: a basis function framework for social re-calibration of sensorimotor representations supporting joint action

Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2013

The article explores the possibilities of formalizing and explaining the mechanisms that support ... more The article explores the possibilities of formalizing and explaining the mechanisms that support spatial and social perspective alignment sustained over the duration of a social interaction. The basic proposed principle is that in social contexts the mechanisms for sensorimotor transformations and multisensory integration (learn to) incorporate information relative to the other actor(s), similar to the "re-calibration" of visual receptive fields in response to repeated tool use. This process aligns or merges the co-actors' spatial representations and creates a "Shared Action Space" (SAS) supporting key computations of social interactions and joint actions; for example, the remapping between the coordinate systems and frames of reference of the co-actors, including perspective taking, the sensorimotor transformations required for lifting jointly an object, and the predictions of the sensory effects of such joint action. The social re-calibration is proposed to be based on common basis function maps (BFMs) and could constitute an optimal solution to sensorimotor transformation and multisensory integration in joint action or more in general social interaction contexts. However, certain situations such as discrepant postural and viewpoint alignment and associated differences in perspectives between the co-actors could constrain the process quite differently. We discuss how alignment is achieved in the first place, and how it is maintained over time, providing a taxonomy of various forms and mechanisms of space alignment and overlap based, for instance, on automaticity vs. control of the transformations between the two agents. Finally, we discuss the link between low-level mechanisms for the sharing of space and high-level mechanisms for the sharing of cognitive representations.

Research paper thumbnail of Decision and action planning signals in human posterior parietal cortex during delayed perceptual choices

The European journal of neuroscience, 2014

During simple perceptual decisions, sensorimotor neurons in monkey fronto-parietal cortex represe... more During simple perceptual decisions, sensorimotor neurons in monkey fronto-parietal cortex represent a decision variable that guides the transformation of sensory evidence into a motor response, supporting the view that mechanisms for decision-making are closely embedded within sensorimotor structures. Within these structures, however, decision signals can be dissociated from motor signals, thus indicating that sensorimotor neurons can play multiple and independent roles in decision-making and action selection/planning. Here we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine whether response-selective human brain areas encode signals for decision-making or action planning during a task requiring an arbitrary association between face pictures (male vs. female) and specific actions (saccadic eye vs. hand pointing movements). The stimuli were gradually unmasked to stretch the time necessary for decision, thus maximising the temporal separation between decision and action planning. Decision-related signals were measured in parietal and motor/premotor regions showing a preference for the planning/execution of saccadic or pointing movements. In a parietal reach region, decision-related signals were specific for the stimulus category associated with its preferred pointing response. By contrast, a saccade-selective posterior intraparietal sulcus region carried decision-related signals even when the task required a pointing response. Consistent signals were observed in the motor/premotor cortex. Whole-brain analyses indicated that, in our task, the most reliable decision signals were found in the same neural regions involved in response selection. However, decision- and action-related signals within these regions can be dissociated. Differences between the parietal reach region and posterior intraparietal sulcus plausibly depend on their functional specificity rather than on the task structure.

Research paper thumbnail of Predictive Technologies: Can Smart Tools Augment the Brain's Predictive Abilities

The ability of " looking into the future " —namely, the capacity of anticipating future states of... more The ability of " looking into the future " —namely, the capacity of anticipating future states of the environment or of the body—represents a fundamental function of human (and animal) brains. A goalkeeper who tries to guess the ball's direction; a chess player who attempts to anticipate the opponent's next move; or a man-in-love who tries to calculate what are the chances of her saying yes—in all these cases, people are simulating possible future states of the world, in order to maximize the success of their decisions or actions. Research in neuroscience is showing that our ability to predict the behavior of physical or social phenomena is largely dependent on the brain's ability to integrate current and past information to generate (probabilistic) simulations of the future. But could predictive processing be augmented using advanced technologies? In this contribution, we discuss how computational technologies may be used to support, facilitate or enhance the prediction of future events, by considering exemplificative scenarios across different domains, from simpler sensorimotor decisions to more complex cognitive tasks. We also examine the key scientific and technical challenges that must be faced to turn this vision into reality.

Research paper thumbnail of Nonparametric Problem-Space Clustering: Learning Efficient Codes for Cognitive Control Tasks

We present an information-theoretic method permitting one to find structure in a problem space (h... more We present an information-theoretic method permitting one to find structure in a problem space (here, in a spatial navigation domain) and cluster it in ways that are convenient to solve different classes of control problems, which include planning a path to a goal from a known or an unknown location, achieving multiple goals and exploring a novel environment. Our generative nonparametric approach, called the generative embedded Chinese restaurant process (geCRP), extends the family of Chinese restaurant process (CRP) models by introducing a parameterizable notion of distance (or kernel) between the states to be clustered together. By using different kernels, such as the the conditional probability or joint probability of two states, the same geCRP method clusters the environment in ways that are more sensitive to different control-related information, such as goal, sub-goal and path information. We perform a series of simulations in three scenarios—an open space, a grid world with four rooms and a maze having the same structure as the Hanoi Tower—in order to illustrate the characteristics of the different clusters (obtained using different kernels) and their relative benefits for solving planning and control problems.

Research paper thumbnail of The principles of goal-directed decisionmaking: from neural mechanisms to computation and robotics

Research paper thumbnail of The why, what, where, when and how of goal-directed choice: neuronal and computational principles

The central problems that goal-directed animals must solve are: ‘What do I need and Why, Where an... more The central problems that goal-directed animals must solve are: ‘What do I need and Why, Where and When can this be obtained, and How do I get it?’ or the H4W problem. Here, we elucidate the principles underlying the neuronal solutions to H4W using a combination of neurobiological and neurorobotic
approaches. First, we analyse H4W from a system-level perspective by mapping its objectives onto the Distributed Adaptive Control embodied cognitive architecture which sees the generation of adaptive action in the real world as the primary task of the brain rather than optimally solving abstract problems. We next map this functional decomposition to the architecture of the rodent brain to test its consistency. Following this approach, we propose that the mammalian brain solves the H4W problem on the basis of multiple kinds of outcome predictions, integrating central representations
of needs and drives (e.g. hypothalamus), valence (e.g. amygdala), world, self and task state spaces (e.g. neocortex, hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, respectively) combined with multi-modal selection (e.g. basal ganglia). In our analysis, goal-directed behaviour results from a wellstructured architecture in which goals are bootstrapped on the basis of predefined needs, valence and multiple learning, memory and planning mechanisms rather than being generated by a singular computation.

Research paper thumbnail of Anticipatory Behavior in Adaptive Learning Systems

Research paper thumbnail of Analysis of hand kinematics reveals inter‑individual differences in intertemporal decision dynamics

During intertemporal decisions, the preference for smaller, sooner reward over larger-delayed rew... more During intertemporal decisions, the preference for smaller, sooner reward over larger-delayed rewards (temporal discounting, TD) exhibits substantial inter-subject variability; however, it is currently unclear what are the mechanisms underlying this apparently idiosyncratic behavior. To answer this question, here we recorded and analyzed mouse movement kinematics during intertemporal choices in a large sample of participants (N = 86). Results revealed a specific pattern of decision dynamics associated with the selection of “immediate” versus “delayed” response alternatives, which well discriminated between a “discounter” versus a “farsighted” behavior—thus representing a reliable behavioral marker of TD preferences. By fitting the Drift Diffusion Model to the data, we showed that differences between discounter and farsighted subjects could be explained in terms of different model parameterizations, corresponding to the use of different choice mechanisms in the two groups. While farsighted subjects were biased toward the “delayed” option, discounter subjects were not correspondingly biased toward the “immediate” option. Rather, as shown by the dynamics of evidence accumulation over time, their behavior was characterized
by high choice uncertainty.

Research paper thumbnail of Interindividual Variability in Functional Connectivity as Long-Term Correlate of Temporal Discounting

During intertemporal choice (IT) future outcomes are usually devaluated as a function of the dela... more During intertemporal choice (IT) future outcomes are usually devaluated as a function of the
delay, a phenomenon known as temporal discounting (TD). Based on task-evoked activity,
previous neuroimaging studies have described several networks associated with TD. However,
given its relevance for several disorders, a critical challenge is to define a specific neural
marker able to predict TD independently of task execution. To this aim, we used restingstate
functional connectivity MRI (fcMRI) and measured TD during economic choices several
months apart in 25 human subjects.We further explored the relationship between TD, impulsivity
and decision uncertainty by collecting standard questionnaires on individual trait/
state differences. Our findings indicate that fcMRI within and between critical nodes of taskevoked
neural networks associated with TD correlates with discounting behavior measured
a long time afterwards, independently of impulsivity. Importantly, the nodes form an intrinsic
circuit that might support all the mechanisms underlying TD, from the representation of subjective
value to choice selection through modulatory effects of cognitive control and episodic prospection.

Research paper thumbnail of The role of synergies within generative models of action execution and recognition: A computational perspective

Controlling the body -given its huge number of degrees of freedom -poses severe computational cha... more Controlling the body -given its huge number of degrees of freedom -poses severe computational challenges. Mounting evidence suggests that the brain alleviates this problem by exploiting "synergies", or patterns of muscle activities (and/or movement dynamics and kinematics) that can be combined to control action, rather than controlling individual muscles of joints [1-10].

Research paper thumbnail of Studying mirror mechanisms within generative and predictive architectures for joint action

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior

Research paper thumbnail of Human sensorimotor communication: a theory of signaling in online social interactions

PloS one, 2013

Although the importance of communication is recognized in several disciplines, it is rarely studi... more Although the importance of communication is recognized in several disciplines, it is rarely studied in the context of online social interactions and joint actions. During online joint actions, language and gesture are often insufficient and humans typically use non-verbal, sensorimotor forms of communication to send coordination signals. For example, when playing volleyball, an athlete can exaggerate her movements to signal her intentions to her teammates (say, a pass to the right) or to feint an adversary. Similarly, a person who is transporting a table together with a co-actor can push the table in a certain direction to signal where and when he intends to place it. Other examples of ''signaling'' are over-articulating in noisy environments and over-emphasizing vowels in child-directed speech. In all these examples, humans intentionally modify their action kinematics to make their goals easier to disambiguate. At the moment no formal theory exists of these forms of sensorimotor communication and signaling. We present one such theory that describes signaling as a combination of a pragmatic and a communicative action, and explains how it simplifies coordination in online social interactions. We cast signaling within a ''joint action optimization'' framework in which co-actors optimize the success of their interaction and joint goals rather than only their part of the joint action. The decision of whether and how much to signal requires solving a trade-off between the costs of modifying one's behavior and the benefits in terms of interaction success. Signaling is thus an intentional strategy that supports social interactions; it acts in concert with automatic mechanisms of resonance, prediction, and imitation, especially when the context makes actions and intentions ambiguous and difficult to read. Our theory suggests that communication dynamics should be studied within theories of coordination and interaction rather than only in terms of the maximization of information transmission.

Research paper thumbnail of Consensus paper: the cerebellum's role in movement and cognition

Cerebellum (London, England), 2014

While the cerebellum's role in motor function is well recognized, the nature of its concurrent ro... more While the cerebellum's role in motor function is well recognized, the nature of its concurrent role in cognitive function remains considerably less clear. The current consensus paper gathers diverse views on a variety of important roles played by the cerebellum across a range of cognitive and emotional functions. This paper considers the cerebellum in relation to neurocognitive development, language function, working memory, executive function, and the development of cerebellar internal control models and reflects upon some of the ways in which better understanding the cerebellum's status as a “supervised learning machine” can enrich our ability to understand human function and adaptation. As all contributors agree that the cerebellum plays a role in cognition, there is also an agreement that this conclusion remains highly inferential. Many conclusions about the role of the cerebellum in cognition originate from applying known information about cerebellar contributions to the coordination and quality of movement. These inferences are based on the uniformity of the cerebellum's compositional infrastructure and its apparent modular organization. There is considerable support for this view, based upon observations of patients with pathology within the cerebellum.

Research paper thumbnail of Using Domain Information for Word Sense Disambiguation

The major goal in ITC-irst's participation at SENSEVAL-2 was to test the role of domain informati... more The major goal in ITC-irst's participation at SENSEVAL-2 was to test the role of domain information in word sense disambiguation. The underlying working hypothesis is that domain labels, such as MEDICINE, ARCHITECTURE and SPORT provide a natural way to establish semantic relations among word senses, which can be profitably used during the disambiguation process. For each task in which we participated (i.e. English all words, English 'lexical sample' and Italian 'lexical sample') a different mix of knowledge based and statistical techniques were implemented.

Research paper thumbnail of The role of domain information in Word Sense Disambiguation

Natural Language Engineering, 2002

This paper explores the role of domain information in word sense disambiguation. The underlying h... more This paper explores the role of domain information in word sense disambiguation. The underlying hypothesis is that domain labels, such as Medicine, Architecture and Sport, provide a useful way to establish semantic relations among word senses, which can be profitably used during the disambiguation process. Results obtained at the Senseval-2 initiative confirm that for a significant subset of words domain information can be used to disambiguate with a very high level of precision.

Research paper thumbnail of Why a Cognitive Trustier Performs Better: Simulating Trust-Based Contract Nets

In this paper we use a contract net protocol in order to compare various delegation strategies. W... more In this paper we use a contract net protocol in order to compare various delegation strategies. We have implemented some different agents, having a set of tasks to delegate (or to perform by themselves); the tasks are performed by the agents in a dynamic environment, that can help or worse their activity. The agent rely upon different strategies in order to choose whom to delegate. We implemented three classes of trustiers: a random trustier (who randomly chooses the trustee whom delegate the task to); a statistical trustier (who builds the trustworthiness of other agents only on the basis of their previous performances); a cognitive trustier (who builds a sophisticated and cognitively motivated trust model of the trustee, taking into account its specific features, its ability and motivational disposition, and the impact of the environment on its performance). Our experiments show the advantage of using cognitive representations.

Research paper thumbnail of Trust in information sources as a source for trust: a fuzzy approach

The aim of this paper is to show how relevant is a trust model based on beliefs and their credibi... more The aim of this paper is to show how relevant is a trust model based on beliefs and their credibility.

Research paper thumbnail of A Fuzzy Approach to a Belief-Based Trust Computation

The approaches to the trust study are various and very different each of other. In our view, just... more The approaches to the trust study are various and very different each of other. In our view, just a socio-cognitive approach to trust would be able to analyze the sub-components (the basic beliefs) on which the final decision to trust or not is taken. In this paper we show a first implementation and advance of the socio-cognitive model of trust developed in [1, 2] using the so-called Fuzzy Cognitive Maps. With this implementation we show how the different components may change and how their impact can change depending from the specific situation and from the agent personality.

Research paper thumbnail of Intentional strategies that make co-actors more predictable: the case of signaling

The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2013

Pickering & Garrod (P&G) explain dialogue dynamics in terms of forward modeling and prediction-by... more Pickering & Garrod (P&G) explain dialogue dynamics in terms of forward modeling and prediction-by-simulation mechanisms. Their theory dissolves a strict segregation between production and comprehension processes, and it links dialogue to action-based theories of joint action. We propose that the theory can also incorporate intentional strategies that increase communicative success: for example, signaling strategies that help remaining predictable and forming common ground.

Research paper thumbnail of Why do you fear the bogeyman? An embodied predictive coding model of perceptual inference

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2013

Why are we scared by nonperceptual entities such as the bogeyman, and why does the bogeyman only ... more Why are we scared by nonperceptual entities such as the bogeyman, and why does the bogeyman only visit us during the night? Why does hearing a window squeaking in the night suggest to us the unlikely idea of a thief or a killer? And why is this more likely to happen after watching a horror movie? To answer these and similar questions, we need to put mind and body together again and consider the embodied nature of perceptual and cognitive inference. Predictive coding provides a general framework for perceptual inference; I propose to extend it by including interoceptive and bodily information. The resulting embodied predictive coding inference permits one to compare alternative hypotheses (e.g., is the sound I hear generated by a thief or the wind?) using the same inferential scheme as in predictive coding, but using both sensory and interoceptive information as evidence, rather than just considering sensory events. If you hear a window squeaking in the night after watching a horror movie, you may consider plausible a very unlikely hypothesis (e.g., a thief, or even the bogeyman) because it explains both what you sense (e.g., the window squeaking in the night) and how you feel (e.g., your high heart rate). The good news is that the inference that I propose is fully rational and gives minds and bodies equal dignity. The bad news is that it also gives an embodiment to the bogeyman, and a reason to fear it.

Research paper thumbnail of Shared action spaces: a basis function framework for social re-calibration of sensorimotor representations supporting joint action

Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2013

The article explores the possibilities of formalizing and explaining the mechanisms that support ... more The article explores the possibilities of formalizing and explaining the mechanisms that support spatial and social perspective alignment sustained over the duration of a social interaction. The basic proposed principle is that in social contexts the mechanisms for sensorimotor transformations and multisensory integration (learn to) incorporate information relative to the other actor(s), similar to the "re-calibration" of visual receptive fields in response to repeated tool use. This process aligns or merges the co-actors' spatial representations and creates a "Shared Action Space" (SAS) supporting key computations of social interactions and joint actions; for example, the remapping between the coordinate systems and frames of reference of the co-actors, including perspective taking, the sensorimotor transformations required for lifting jointly an object, and the predictions of the sensory effects of such joint action. The social re-calibration is proposed to be based on common basis function maps (BFMs) and could constitute an optimal solution to sensorimotor transformation and multisensory integration in joint action or more in general social interaction contexts. However, certain situations such as discrepant postural and viewpoint alignment and associated differences in perspectives between the co-actors could constrain the process quite differently. We discuss how alignment is achieved in the first place, and how it is maintained over time, providing a taxonomy of various forms and mechanisms of space alignment and overlap based, for instance, on automaticity vs. control of the transformations between the two agents. Finally, we discuss the link between low-level mechanisms for the sharing of space and high-level mechanisms for the sharing of cognitive representations.

Research paper thumbnail of Decision and action planning signals in human posterior parietal cortex during delayed perceptual choices

The European journal of neuroscience, 2014

During simple perceptual decisions, sensorimotor neurons in monkey fronto-parietal cortex represe... more During simple perceptual decisions, sensorimotor neurons in monkey fronto-parietal cortex represent a decision variable that guides the transformation of sensory evidence into a motor response, supporting the view that mechanisms for decision-making are closely embedded within sensorimotor structures. Within these structures, however, decision signals can be dissociated from motor signals, thus indicating that sensorimotor neurons can play multiple and independent roles in decision-making and action selection/planning. Here we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine whether response-selective human brain areas encode signals for decision-making or action planning during a task requiring an arbitrary association between face pictures (male vs. female) and specific actions (saccadic eye vs. hand pointing movements). The stimuli were gradually unmasked to stretch the time necessary for decision, thus maximising the temporal separation between decision and action planning. Decision-related signals were measured in parietal and motor/premotor regions showing a preference for the planning/execution of saccadic or pointing movements. In a parietal reach region, decision-related signals were specific for the stimulus category associated with its preferred pointing response. By contrast, a saccade-selective posterior intraparietal sulcus region carried decision-related signals even when the task required a pointing response. Consistent signals were observed in the motor/premotor cortex. Whole-brain analyses indicated that, in our task, the most reliable decision signals were found in the same neural regions involved in response selection. However, decision- and action-related signals within these regions can be dissociated. Differences between the parietal reach region and posterior intraparietal sulcus plausibly depend on their functional specificity rather than on the task structure.