Issue 2401: std::function needs more noexcept (original) (raw)

This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of C++17 status.

2401. std::function needs more noexcept

Section: 22.10.17.3 [func.wrap.func] Status: C++17 Submitter: Stephan T. Lavavej Opened: 2014-06-14 Last modified: 2017-07-30

Priority: 0

View all other issues in [func.wrap.func].

View all issues with C++17 status.

Discussion:

There are two issues here:

1. std::function's constructor from nullptr_t is marked as noexcept, but its assignment operator from nullptr_t isn't. This assignment can and should be marked as noexcept.
2. std::function's comparisons with nullptr_t are marked as noexcept in two out of three places.

[2014-06-16 Rapperswil]

Move to Ready

Proposed resolution:

This wording is relative to N3936.

1. Change 22.10 [function.objects] p2, header <functional> synopsis, as indicated:

   namespace std {
   […]
   // 20.9.11 polymorphic function wrappers:
   […]
   template<class R, class... ArgTypes>
   bool operator==(const function<R(ArgTypes...)>&, nullptr_t) noexcept;
   template<class R, class... ArgTypes>
   bool operator==(nullptr_t, const function<R(ArgTypes...)>&) noexcept;
   template<class R, class... ArgTypes>
   bool operator!=(const function<R(ArgTypes...)>&, nullptr_t) noexcept;
   template<class R, class... ArgTypes>
   bool operator!=(nullptr_t, const function<R(ArgTypes...)>&) noexcept;
   […]
   }

2. Change 22.10.17.3 [func.wrap.func], class template function synopsis, as indicated:

   […]
   // 20.9.11.2.1, construct/copy/destroy:
   […]
   function& operator=(nullptr_t) noexcept;
   […]

3. Change 22.10.17.3.2 [func.wrap.func.con] before p16 as indicated:

   function& operator=(nullptr_t) noexcept;