Issue 2975: Missing case for pair construction in scoped and polymorphic allocators (original) (raw)
This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of C++20 status.
2975. Missing case for pair construction in scoped and polymorphic allocators
Section: 20.5.3.3 [mem.poly.allocator.mem], 20.6.4 [allocator.adaptor.members] Status: C++20 Submitter: Casey Carter Opened: 2017-06-13 Last modified: 2021-02-25
Priority: 3
View all other issues in [mem.poly.allocator.mem].
View all issues with C++20 status.
Discussion:
scoped_allocator_adaptor ([allocator.adaptor.syn]) and polymorphic_allocator ([mem.poly.allocator.class]) have identical families of members named construct:
template <class T, class... Args> void construct(T* p, Args&&... args);
template <class T1, class T2, class... Args1, class... Args2> void construct(pair<T1,T2>* p, piecewise_construct_t, tuple<Args1...> x, tuple<Args2...> y); template <class T1, class T2> void construct(pair<T1,T2>* p); template <class T1, class T2, class U, class V> void construct(pair<T1,T2>* p, U&& x, V&& y); template <class T1, class T2, class U, class V> void construct(pair<T1,T2>* p, const pair<U, V>& pr); template <class T1, class T2, class U, class V> void construct(pair<T1,T2>* p, pair<U, V>&& pr);
Both allocators perform uses_allocator construction, and therefore need special handling for pairconstructions since pair doesn't specialize uses_allocator (tuple gets all of that magic and pair is left out in the cold). Presumably, the intent is that the construct overloads whose first argument is a pointer to pair capture all pair constructions. This is not the case: invoking construct with a pair pointer and a non-constant lvalue pair resolves to the _first_overload when it is viable: it's a better match than the pair-pointer-and-const-lvalue-pairoverload. The first overload notably does not properly perform piecewise uses_allocator construction for pairs as intended.
[2017-07 Toronto Monday issue prioritization]
Priority 2; Marshall to work with Casey to reduce the negations in the wording.
Previous resolution [SUPERSEDED]:
- Modify 20.5.3.3 [mem.poly.allocator.mem] as indicated:
template <class T, class... Args>
void construct(T* p, Args&&... args);-5- Requires: Uses-allocator construction of
Twith allocatorresource()(see 20.2.8.2 [allocator.uses.construction]) and constructor argumentsstd::forward<Args>(args)...is well-formed. [Note: Uses-allocator construction is always well formed for types that do not use allocators. — _end note_]-6- Effects: Construct a
Tobject in the storage whose address is represented bypby uses-allocator construction with allocatorresource()and constructor argumentsstd::forward<Args>(args)....-7- Throws: Nothing unless the constructor for
Tthrows.-?- Remarks: This function shall not participate in overload resolution unless
Tis not a specialization ofpair.- Modify 20.6.4 [allocator.adaptor.members] as indicated:
template <class T, class... Args>
void construct(T* p, Args&&... args);-9- Effects: […]
-?- Remarks: This function shall not participate in overload resolution unless
Tis not a specialization ofpair.
[2017-11-02 Marshall and Casey provide updated wording]
[2017-11 Albuquerque Wednesday issue processing]
Move to Ready.
[2018-3-17 Adopted in Jacksonville]
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4659.
- Modify 20.5.3.3 [mem.poly.allocator.mem] as indicated:
template <class T, class... Args>
void construct(T* p, Args&&... args);-5- Requires: Uses-allocator construction of
Twith allocatorresource()(see 20.2.8.2 [allocator.uses.construction]) and constructor argumentsstd::forward<Args>(args)...is well-formed. [Note: Uses-allocator construction is always well formed for types that do not use allocators. — _end note_]-6- Effects: Construct a
Tobject in the storage whose address is represented bypby uses-allocator construction with allocatorresource()and constructor argumentsstd::forward<Args>(args)....-7- Throws: Nothing unless the constructor for
Tthrows.-?- Remarks: This function shall not participate in overload resolution if
Tis a specialization ofpair. - Modify 20.6.4 [allocator.adaptor.members] as indicated:
template <class T, class... Args>
void construct(T* p, Args&&... args);-9- Effects: […]
-?- Remarks: This function shall not participate in overload resolution if
Tis a specialization ofpair.