Issue 3470: convertible-to-non-slicing seems to reject valid case (original) (raw)
This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of C++23 status.
3470. _convertible-to-non-slicing_
seems to reject valid case
Section: 25.5.4 [range.subrange] Status: C++23 Submitter: S. B. Tam Opened: 2020-07-26 Last modified: 2023-11-22
Priority: 3
View all other issues in [range.subrange].
View all issues with C++23 status.
Discussion:
Consider
#include
int main() { int a[3] = { 1, 2, 3 }; int* b[3] = { &a[2], &a[0], &a[1] }; auto c = std::ranges::subrange<const int*const*>(b); }
The construction of c
is ill-formed because _convertible-to-non-slicing_<int**, const int*const*>
is false
, although the conversion does not involve object slicing.
I think subrange
should allow such qualification conversion, just like unique_ptr<T[]>
already does.
(Given that this constraint is useful in more than one context, maybe it deserves a named type trait?)
[2020-08-21; Reflector prioritization]
Set priority to 3 after reflector discussions.
[2021-05-19 Tim adds wording]
The wording below, which has been implemented and tested on top of libstdc++, uses the same technique we use for unique_ptr
, shared_ptr
, and span
. It seems especially appropriate to have feature parity betweensubrange
and span
in this respect.
[2021-06-23; Reflector poll]
Set status to Tentatively Ready after five votes in favour during reflector poll.
[2021-10-14 Approved at October 2021 virtual plenary. Status changed: Voting → WP.]
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4885.
- Modify 25.5.4 [range.subrange] as indicated:
namespace std::ranges {
template<class From, class To>
concept uses-nonqualification-pointer-conversion = // exposition only
is_pointer_v && is_pointer_v &&
!convertible_to<remove_pointer_t<From>(*)[], remove_pointer_t<To>(*)[]>;
template<class From, class To>
concept convertible-to-non-slicing = // exposition only
convertible_to<From, To> &&
!uses-nonqualification-pointer-conversion<decay_t, decay_t>;
!(is_pointer_v<decay_t> &&is_pointer_v<decay_t> &¬-same-as<remove_pointer_t<decay_t>, remove_pointer_t<decay_t>>);
[…]
}
[…]