Issue 3892: Incorrect formatting of nested ranges and tuples (original) (raw)
This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of WP status.
3892. Incorrect formatting of nested ranges and tuples
Section: 28.5.7.2 [format.range.formatter], 28.5.9 [format.tuple] Status: WP Submitter: Victor Zverovich Opened: 2023-02-20 Last modified: 2023-11-22
Priority: 2
View all other issues in [format.range.formatter].
View all issues with WP status.
Discussion:
formatter specializations for ranges and tuples set debug format for underlying element formatters in their parse functions e.g. 28.5.7.2 [format.range.formatter] p9:
template constexpr typename ParseContext::iterator parse(ParseContext& ctx);
Effects: Parses the format specifier as a range-format-spec and stores the parsed specifiers in
*this. The values of_opening-bracket_,_closing-bracket_, and_separator_are modified if and only if required by the range-type or thenoption, if present. If:
- — the range-type is neither
snor?s,- —
_underlying_.set_debug_format()is a valid expression, and- — there is no range-underlying-spec,
then calls
_underlying_.set_debug_format().
However, they don't say anything about calling parse functions of those formatters. As as result, formatting of nested ranges can be incorrect, e.g.
std::string s = std::format("{}", std::vector<std::vectorstd::string>{{"a, b", "c"}});
With the current specification s is [[a, b, c]] instead of [["a, b", "c"]], i.e. strings in the output are not correctly escaped. The same is true for nested tuples and combinations of tuples and ranges.
The fix approved by LEWG as part of P2733 (which was trying to address a different issue) is to always call parse for underlying formatter. Additionally the standard should clarify that format-spec cannot start with '}' because that's the implicit assumption in range formatting and what happens when format-spec is not present.
[2023-03-22; Reflector poll]
Set priority to 2 after reflector poll.
Previous resolution [SUPERSEDED]:
This wording is relative to N4928.
- Modify 28.5.2.1 [format.string.general] p1 as indicated:
[…]
format-specifier:
: format-spec
format-spec:
as specified by the
formatterspecialization for the argument type; cannot start with}- Modify 28.5.6.1 [formatter.requirements] as indicated:
-3- Given character type
charT, output iterator typeOut, and formatting argument typeT, in Table 74 [tab:formatter.basic] and Table 75 [tab:formatter]:[…]
pc.begin()points to the beginning of the format-spec (28.5.2 [format.string]) of the replacement field being formatted in the format string. If format-spec is not present or empty then eitherpc.begin() == pc.end()or*pc.begin() == '}'.- Modify 28.5.7.2 [format.range.formatter] as indicated:
template
constexpr typename ParseContext::iterator
parse(ParseContext& ctx);-9- Effects: Parses the format specifiers as a range-format-spec and stores the parsed specifiers in
*this.Calls_underlying_.parse(ctx)to parse format-spec in range-format-spec or, if the latter is not present, empty format-spec. The values of_opening-bracket_,_closing-bracket_, and_separator_are modified if and only if required by the range-type or thenoption, if present. If:
- (9.1) — the range-type is neither
snor?s,- (9.2) —
_underlying_.set_debug_format()is a valid expression, and- (9.3) — there is no range-underlying-spec,
then calls
_underlying_.set_debug_format().- Modify 28.5.9 [format.tuple] as indicated:
template
constexpr typename ParseContext::iterator
parse(ParseContext& ctx);-7- Effects: Parses the format specifiers as a tuple-format-spec and stores the parsed specifiers in
*this. The values of_opening-bracket_,_closing-bracket_, and_separator_are modified if and only if required by the tuple-type, if present. For each element_e_in_underlying_, calls_e_.parse(ctx)to parse empty format-spec and,if_e_.set_debug_format()is a valid expression, calls_e_.set_debug_format().
[Varna 2023-06-16; Jonathan provides tweaked wording]
Add "an" in two places.
[Varna 2023-06-16; Move to Ready]
This would allow resolving LWG 3776(i) as NAD.
[2023-11-11 Approved at November 2023 meeting in Kona. Status changed: Voting → WP.]
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4928.
- Modify 28.5.2.1 [format.string.general] p1 as indicated:
[…]
format-specifier:
: format-spec
format-spec:
as specified by the
formatterspecialization for the argument type; cannot start with} - Modify 28.5.6.1 [formatter.requirements] as indicated:
-3- Given character type
charT, output iterator typeOut, and formatting argument typeT, in Table 74 [tab:formatter.basic] and Table 75 [tab:formatter]:[…]
pc.begin()points to the beginning of the format-spec (28.5.2 [format.string]) of the replacement field being formatted in the format string. If format-spec is not present or empty then eitherpc.begin() == pc.end()or*pc.begin() == '}'. - Modify 28.5.7.2 [format.range.formatter] as indicated:
template
constexpr typename ParseContext::iterator
parse(ParseContext& ctx);-9- Effects: Parses the format specifiers as a range-format-spec and stores the parsed specifiers in
*this.Calls_underlying_.parse(ctx)to parse format-spec in range-format-spec or, if the latter is not present, an empty format-spec. The values of_opening-bracket_,_closing-bracket_, and_separator_are modified if and only if required by the range-type or thenoption, if present. If:- (9.1) — the range-type is neither
snor?s, - (9.2) —
_underlying_.set_debug_format()is a valid expression, and - (9.3) — there is no range-underlying-spec,
then calls
_underlying_.set_debug_format(). - (9.1) — the range-type is neither
- Modify 28.5.9 [format.tuple] as indicated:
template
constexpr typename ParseContext::iterator
parse(ParseContext& ctx);-7- Effects: Parses the format specifiers as a tuple-format-spec and stores the parsed specifiers in
*this. The values of_opening-bracket_,_closing-bracket_, and_separator_are modified if and only if required by the tuple-type, if present. For each element_e_in_underlying_, calls_e_.parse(ctx)to parse an empty format-spec and,if_e_.set_debug_format()is a valid expression, calls_e_.set_debug_format().