Sebastian Sclofsky | Csu Stanislaus (original) (raw)
Uploads
Papers by Sebastian Sclofsky
International Studies Perspectives, Sep 8, 2017
International Studies Review, Feb 10, 2018
PS: Political Science & Politics
International Studies Perspectives, 2017
Perspectives on Politics, 2020
Routledge Handbook of Public Criminologies
Research Handbook on Modern Legal Realism
PS: Political Science & Politics, 2021
We compiled an original database of syllabi for introductory, graduate courses from top-ranked US... more We compiled an original database of syllabi for introductory, graduate courses from top-ranked US departments to assess the extent to which elite international relations and comparative politics scholars engage with Marx. Analysis of those syllabi overwhelmingly demonstrates that even superficial engagement with Marx or the Marxist tradition is exceedingly rare. We argue that the reasons behind this near-total absence are more political than intellectual and include the embrace of the defeatist , neoliberal logic of the " end of history. " While mainstream disengagement from Marx is perhaps unsurprising, many " critical " political scientists also ignore and/or misread Marx, often because of his purported Eurocentrism. Though Marx's writings at times evince ethnocen-tric biases, Marx engaged in extensive efforts to grapple with the specific-ity of the non-European world. Further, these critics fail to account for how thinkers around the globe have found value in and made theoretical contributions to the universalist Marxist story. We analyze two such cases: the African anticolonial leader Am ılcar Cabral and the Peruvian Marxist theorist and activist José Carlos Mari ategui. We argue that this superficial engagement, misreading, and sometimes the outright ignoring of Marx hinders the discipline's ability to address important real-world problems or theoretical debates, let alone make political science matter.
Why do non-white residents of South L.A. and São Paulo’s periphery share similar experiences rega... more Why do non-white residents of South L.A. and São Paulo’s periphery share similar experiences regarding their interactions with the police? How do these shared experiences influence the formation of racial identities? While the experiences of non-white residents in each city are not identical, they present similar features. Based on extensive fieldwork conducted in South L.A. and São Paulo’s southern and western periphery, this paper argues that non-white victimization by the police is a central component of the necropolitcal governance that renders certain bodies as disposable. These experiences have become a central component in the formation of racial and communal identities. As such they have become part of the rituals that create the imagined community of South L.A. and São Paulo’s periphery. In this sense, this article contends that by understanding the commonalities of these experiences we can expand the limits of the imagined community and as a consequence the limits of resistance to state violence.Why do non-white residents of South L.A. and São Paulo’s periphery share similar experiences regarding their interactions with the police? How do these shared experiences influence the formation of racial identities? While the experiences of non-white residents in each city are not identical, they present similar features. Based on extensive fieldwork conducted in South L.A. and São Paulo’s southern and western periphery, this paper argues that non-white victimization by the police is a central component of the necropolitcal governance that renders certain bodies as disposable. These experiences have become a central component in the formation of racial and communal identities. As such they have become part of the rituals that create the imagined community of South L.A. and São Paulo’s periphery. In this sense, this article contends that by understanding the commonalities of these experiences we can expand the limits of the imagined community and as a consequence the limits of resistance to state violence.
Why do certain democracies allow state agents to systematically violate individual's rights? Why ... more Why do certain democracies allow state agents to systematically violate individual's rights? Why these democracies develop criminal justice systems that fail to protect basic rights? These are the main the questions this work will address. The systematic unequal application of the law, the violation of individual rights, and the lack of protection from state violence has become a common feature in certain democracies. Rather than being an exceptional situation, this has become a central feature of the criminal justice system. This situation not only affects the live of individuals but diminishes the quality of democracy in those countries. In this research I will attempt to show empirically that a highly repressive criminal justice system developed in both the United States and Brazil. In order to do so, I first propose a definition of highly repressive criminal justice systems and establish a series of indicators that allow us to evaluate them. Next, I will conduct an historical analysis that will explore the formation of the criminal justice system and how the institutional arrangements created at a certain point in time led the system to become highly repressive. Finally, I argue that this type of systems diminish the quality of democracy if by democracy we understand, as I believe we should, more than a political regime with institutional guarantees for contestation and participation.
International Studies Perspectives, Sep 8, 2017
International Studies Review, Feb 10, 2018
PS: Political Science & Politics
International Studies Perspectives, 2017
Perspectives on Politics, 2020
Routledge Handbook of Public Criminologies
Research Handbook on Modern Legal Realism
PS: Political Science & Politics, 2021
We compiled an original database of syllabi for introductory, graduate courses from top-ranked US... more We compiled an original database of syllabi for introductory, graduate courses from top-ranked US departments to assess the extent to which elite international relations and comparative politics scholars engage with Marx. Analysis of those syllabi overwhelmingly demonstrates that even superficial engagement with Marx or the Marxist tradition is exceedingly rare. We argue that the reasons behind this near-total absence are more political than intellectual and include the embrace of the defeatist , neoliberal logic of the " end of history. " While mainstream disengagement from Marx is perhaps unsurprising, many " critical " political scientists also ignore and/or misread Marx, often because of his purported Eurocentrism. Though Marx's writings at times evince ethnocen-tric biases, Marx engaged in extensive efforts to grapple with the specific-ity of the non-European world. Further, these critics fail to account for how thinkers around the globe have found value in and made theoretical contributions to the universalist Marxist story. We analyze two such cases: the African anticolonial leader Am ılcar Cabral and the Peruvian Marxist theorist and activist José Carlos Mari ategui. We argue that this superficial engagement, misreading, and sometimes the outright ignoring of Marx hinders the discipline's ability to address important real-world problems or theoretical debates, let alone make political science matter.
Why do non-white residents of South L.A. and São Paulo’s periphery share similar experiences rega... more Why do non-white residents of South L.A. and São Paulo’s periphery share similar experiences regarding their interactions with the police? How do these shared experiences influence the formation of racial identities? While the experiences of non-white residents in each city are not identical, they present similar features. Based on extensive fieldwork conducted in South L.A. and São Paulo’s southern and western periphery, this paper argues that non-white victimization by the police is a central component of the necropolitcal governance that renders certain bodies as disposable. These experiences have become a central component in the formation of racial and communal identities. As such they have become part of the rituals that create the imagined community of South L.A. and São Paulo’s periphery. In this sense, this article contends that by understanding the commonalities of these experiences we can expand the limits of the imagined community and as a consequence the limits of resistance to state violence.Why do non-white residents of South L.A. and São Paulo’s periphery share similar experiences regarding their interactions with the police? How do these shared experiences influence the formation of racial identities? While the experiences of non-white residents in each city are not identical, they present similar features. Based on extensive fieldwork conducted in South L.A. and São Paulo’s southern and western periphery, this paper argues that non-white victimization by the police is a central component of the necropolitcal governance that renders certain bodies as disposable. These experiences have become a central component in the formation of racial and communal identities. As such they have become part of the rituals that create the imagined community of South L.A. and São Paulo’s periphery. In this sense, this article contends that by understanding the commonalities of these experiences we can expand the limits of the imagined community and as a consequence the limits of resistance to state violence.
Why do certain democracies allow state agents to systematically violate individual's rights? Why ... more Why do certain democracies allow state agents to systematically violate individual's rights? Why these democracies develop criminal justice systems that fail to protect basic rights? These are the main the questions this work will address. The systematic unequal application of the law, the violation of individual rights, and the lack of protection from state violence has become a common feature in certain democracies. Rather than being an exceptional situation, this has become a central feature of the criminal justice system. This situation not only affects the live of individuals but diminishes the quality of democracy in those countries. In this research I will attempt to show empirically that a highly repressive criminal justice system developed in both the United States and Brazil. In order to do so, I first propose a definition of highly repressive criminal justice systems and establish a series of indicators that allow us to evaluate them. Next, I will conduct an historical analysis that will explore the formation of the criminal justice system and how the institutional arrangements created at a certain point in time led the system to become highly repressive. Finally, I argue that this type of systems diminish the quality of democracy if by democracy we understand, as I believe we should, more than a political regime with institutional guarantees for contestation and participation.