Incidence of Stress Cardiomyopathy During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic (original) (raw)

Key Points

Question Is psychological, social, and economic stress associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) associated with the incidence of stress cardiomyopathy?

Findings This cohort study included 1914 patients with acute coronary syndrome to compare patients presenting during the COVID-19 pandemic with patients presenting across 4 timelines prior to the pandemic and found a significantly increased incidence of 7.8% of stress cardiomyopathy during the COVID-19 pandemic, compared with prepandemic incidences that ranged from 1.5% to 1.8%.

Meaning These findings suggest that psychological, social, and economic stress related to the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with an increased incidence of stress cardiomyopathy.

Importance The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in severe psychological, social, and economic stress in people’s lives. It is not known whether the stress of the pandemic is associated with an increase in the incidence of stress cardiomyopathy.

Objective To determine the incidence and outcomes of stress cardiomyopathy during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with before the pandemic.

Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study at cardiac catheterization laboratories with primary percutaneous coronary intervention capability at 2 hospitals in the Cleveland Clinic health system in Northeast Ohio examined the incidence of stress cardiomyopathy (also known as Takotsubo syndrome) in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome who underwent coronary arteriography. Patients presenting during the COVID-19 pandemic, between March 1 and April 30, 2020, were compared with 4 control groups of patients with acute coronary syndrome presenting prior to the pandemic across 4 distinct timelines: March to April 2018, January to February 2019, March to April 2019, and January to February 2020. Data were analyzed in May 2020.

Exposures Patients were divided into 5 groups based on the date of their clinical presentation in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Main Outcomes and Measures Incidence of stress cardiomyopathy.

Results Among 1914 patient presenting with acute coronary syndrome, 1656 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 67 [59-74]; 1094 [66.1%] men) presented during the pre–COVID-19 period (390 patients in March-April 2018, 309 patients in January-February 2019, 679 patients in March-April 2019, and 278 patients in January-February 2020), and 258 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 67 [57-75]; 175 [67.8%] men) presented during the COVID-19 pandemic period (ie, March-April 2020). There was a significant increase in the incidence of stress cardiomyopathy during the COVID-19 period, with a total of 20 patients with stress cardiomyopathy (incidence proportion, 7.8%), compared with prepandemic timelines, which ranged from 5 to 12 patients with stress cardiomyopathy (incidence proportion range, 1.5%-1.8%). The rate ratio comparing the COVID-19 pandemic period to the combined prepandemic period was 4.58 (95% CI, 4.11-5.11; P < .001). All patients during the COVID-19 pandemic had negative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction test results for COVID-19. Patients with stress cardiomyopathy during the COVID-19 pandemic had a longer median (interquartile range) hospital length of stay compared with those hospitalized in the prepandemic period (COVID-19 period: 8 [6-9] days; March-April 2018: 4 [3-4] days; January-February 2019: 5 [3-6] days; March-April 2019: 4 [4-8] days; January-February: 5 [4-5] days; P = .006). There were no significant differences between the COVID-19 period and the overall pre–COVID-19 period in mortality (1 patient [5.0%] vs 1 patient [3.6%], respectively; P = .81) or 30-day rehospitalization (4 patients [22.2%] vs 6 patients [21.4%], respectively; P = .90).

Conclusions and Relevance This study found that there was a significant increase in the incidence of stress cardiomyopathy during the COVID-19 pandemic when compared with prepandemic periods.

The World Health Organization has declared coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, a global pandemic. As of June 2020, nearly 8.5 million infections have been reported worldwide, resulting in approximately 450 000 deaths in more than 200 countries and territories. The effect of COVID-19 has extended beyond health care, having significant social, economic, and cultural ramifications. The global effects of the virus have been linked with increasing stress and anxiety worldwide.1 Recently, clinicians have reported a rise in stress cardiomyopathy (also known as Takotsubo syndrome) worldwide during the COVID-19 pandemic.2,3 This observation warrants further investigation to unravel a plausible pathogenic mechanism associated with COVID-19 causing Takotsubo syndrome–like cardiomyopathy vs a true increase in its incidence due to the associated psychological, social, and economic stress with imposed quarantine, lack of social interaction, strict physical distancing rules, and its economic consequences in people’s lives. Our study investigated the incidence of stress (ie, Takotsubo) cardiomyopathy during the COVID-19 pandemic in comparison with its incidence in historical cohorts, its association with the viral infection, and related outcomes.

This cohort study was approved by the institutional review board at Cleveland Clinic. A waiver of informed consent was granted because of minimal risk exposure to patients per Cleveland Clinic policy. This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline.

We retrospectively analyzed the electronic medical records of all patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (ie, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and unstable angina) during March 1 to April 30, 2018, January 1 to February 28, 2019, March 1 to April 30, 2019, and January 1 to February 29, 2020, as our control groups, as well as March 1 to April 30, 2020, as our study group of patients who presented during the COVID-19 pandemic. All procedures were performed at 2 hospitals in the Cleveland Clinic health system in Northeast Ohio: Cleveland Clinic Main Campus (Cleveland, Ohio) and Cleveland Clinic Akron General (Akron, Ohio). The incidence of stress cardiomyopathy was measured and compared across timelines.

Stress cardiomyopathy was diagnosed in accordance with the international Takotsubo syndrome diagnostic criteria in 2014 (ie, InterTAK diagnostic criteria).4 The criteria include transient left ventricular dysfunction presenting as apical ballooning or midventricular, basal, or focal wall-motion anomalies; an emotional, physical, or combined trigger may precede the disease onset (but is not obligatory); neurological disorders, as well as pheochromocytoma, may serve as triggers; new electrocardiographic anomalies are present (eg, ST-segment elevation, ST-segment depression, T wave inversion, and QTc prolongation); moderate elevation in cardiac biomarker levels (eg, troponin and creatine kinase) and significant elevation of brain natriuretic peptide; no evidence of myocarditis; and significant coronary artery disease may coexist. Findings on 12-lead electrocardiography, coronary arteriography, and echocardiography were interpreted and reported by Cleveland Clinic cardiologists. Clinical outcomes recorded in patients with stress cardiomyopathy included cardiac arrhythmias, hospital length of stay, 30-day rehospitalization, and overall mortality.

Testing for COVID-19 was performed using reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), with samples collected from nasopharyngeal and throat swabs. COVID-19 testing in the study group was performed in patients meeting the previously published Cleveland Clinic COVID-19 testing criteria.5 All patients with stress cardiomyopathy in the study group were tested for COVID-19.

After assessing the distribution, continuous data were presented as medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs), and nominal data were presented as proportions. Continuous data across groups were compared using Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test, while categorical data were compared using Pearson χ2 test. The rate of stress cardiomyopathy among the pandemic and prepandemic periods was modeled using a Poisson regression model adjusting for overdispersion with a scale parameter. While each of the intervals studied was a 2-month period, the number of patients presenting with ACS and undergoing coronary arteriography differed among them. Thus, the number of patients served as an offset term (log transformed). Adjusted Wald method was used to compute 95% CIs of proportions. P values were 2-sided, and P < .05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were conducted in R statistical software version 3.6.2 (R Project for Statistical Computing). Data were analyzed from May to June 2020.

The final analysis included 1914 patients admitted to hospitals with ACS. A total of 1656 patients were admitted during the pre–COVID-19 period across 4 timelines, with 290 patients admitted from March to April 2018, 309 patients admitted from January to February 2019, 679 patients admitted from March to April 2019, and 278 patients admitted from January to February 2020. The COVID-19 period cohort included 258 patients admitted from March to April 2020. There were no significant differences between groups in the median (IQR) age (pre–COVID-19 period: 67 [59-74] years vs COVID-19 period: 67 [57-75] years; P = .56) or sex (pre–COVID-19 period: 1064 [66.1%] men vs COVID-19 period: 175 [67.8%] men; P = .43) (Table 1). Hypertension was the most frequently occurring comorbidity across all groups and was highest in the COVID-19 period (March-April 2018: 349 patients [89.5%]; January-February 2019: 259 patients [83.8%]; March-April 2019: 524 patients [77.2%]; January-February 2020: 229 patients [82.4%]; COVID-19 period: 232 patients [89.9%]; P < .001), followed by hyperlipidemia (March-April 2018: 294 patients [75.4%]; January-February 2019: 235 patients [76.1%]; March-April 2019: 461 patients [67.9%]; January-February 2020: 221 patients [79.5%]; COVID-19 period: 199 patients [77.1%]; P < .001). Compared with subgroups in other timelines, patients in the COVID-19 period had significantly lower median (IQR) initial troponin levels (March-April 2018: 0.28 [0.01-0.90] ng/mL; January-February 2019: 0.21 [0.01-1.01] ng/mL; March-April 2019: 0.40 [0.04-1.40] ng/mL; January-February 2020: 0.40 [0.07-1.38] ng/mL; COVID-19 period: 0.18 [0.03-0.50] ng/mL [to convert to micrograms per liter, multiply by 1]; P < .001) and peak troponin levels (March-April 2018: 2.42 [0.75- 6.27] ng/mL; January-February 2019: 1.48 [0.10-4.15] ng/mL; March-April 2019: 1.8 [0.21-6.95] ng/mL; January-February 2020: 3.10 [0.60-8.10] ng/mL; COVID-19 period: 0.7 [0.15-2.10] ng/mL; P < .001). Baseline characteristics of patients with stress cardiomyopathy stratified by pre–COVID-19 and COVID-19 periods are listed in Table 2. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics of patients with stress cardiomyopathy, except for hypertension (March-April 2018: 6 patients [100%]; January-February 2019: 5 patients [100%]; March-April 2019: 7 patients [58.3%]; January-February 2020: 5 patients [100%]; COVID-19 period: 19 patients [95.0%]; P = .01) and median (IQR) peak troponin levels (March-April 2018: 1.02 [0.92-3.12] ng/mL; January-February 2019: 1.30 [0.06-1.30] ng/mL; March-April 2019: 1.30 [0.15-2.64] ng/mL; January-February 2020: 1.80 [1.20-2.10] ng/mL; COVID-19 period: 0.30 [0.11-0.75] ng/mL; P = .03). All RT-PCR tests from patients during the COVID-19 pandemic were negative for COVID-19. There was a significant increase in the incidence of stress cardiomyopathy in patients presenting with ACS during the COVID-19 period, with a total of 20 patients (incidence proportion, 7.8%) compared with the pre–COVID-19 timelines, which ranged from 5 to 12 patients (incidence proportion range, 1.5%-1.8%) (Figure). Comparing the COVID-19 period with the combined prepandemic period, the rate ratio was 4.58 (95% CI, 4.11-5.11; P < .001). Adjusted rate ratios were similar in magnitude. When comparing the COVID-19 period to each prepandemic period individually, the rate ratios ranged from 4.31 (95% CI, 1.62-11.48) to 5.04 (95% CI, 2.02-12.55) (eTable in the Supplement).

Patients with stress cardiomyopathy during the COVID-19 pandemic had a longer median (IQR) hospital length of stay compared with those hospitalized in the prepandemic period (COVID-19 period: 8 [6-9] days; March-April 2018: 4 [3-4] days; January-February 2019: 5 [3-6] days; March-April 2019: 4 [4-8] days; January-February: 5 [4-5] days; P = .006). There were no significant differences between the COVID-19 period and the overall pre–COVID-19 period in mortality (1 patient [5.0%] vs 1 patient [3.6%]; P = .81) or 30-day rehospitalization (4 patients [22.2%] vs 6 patients [21.4%]; P = .90).

To our knowledge, this cohort study is the first study to systematically investigate the association of the incidence of stress cardiomyopathy with the psychological, social, and economic stress associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. The principal finding of our analysis provides an insight into the increasing incidence of stress cardiomyopathy during the pandemic. The incidence of stress cardiomyopathy was significantly higher in patients presenting with ACS between March 1 and April 30, 2020, compared with 4 control groups across prepandemic timelines. The incidence of stress cardiomyopathy in the control groups was similar to that reported in the literature, ranging from 1.0% to 2.0% in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction.6-8 The study group outcomes were similar to the control group with regard to mortality and 30-day rehospitalization. However, patients with stress cardiomyopathy hospitalized during the pandemic had a significantly longer hospital length of stay.

The association between stress cardiomyopathy and increasing levels of stress and anxiety has long been established.4 The psychological, social, and economic distress accompanying the pandemic, rather than direct viral involvement and sequelae of the infection, are more likely factors associated with the increase in stress cardiomyopathy cases. This was further supported by negative COVID-19 testing results in all patients diagnosed with stress cardiomyopathy in the study group.

There may still be an association of COVID-19 with Takotsubo-like cardiomyopathy. Few patients with Takotsubo syndrome with underlying COVID-19 have been reported in the literature.2,3 The mechanism behind this type of myocardial injury in patients with COVID-19 remains to be elucidated.

This study has some limitations. While our study examined patients from 2 hospitals within our health system, our sample represents the population of Northeast Ohio in the US. The results should be interpreted with caution when applied to other states or countries. Further research must examine the association of COVID-19 with the incidence of stress cardiomyopathy and study any temporal or regional differences. In addition, it is plausible that patients with ACS chose to avoid visiting a hospital facility amidst a pandemic, resulting in a sampling bias. Our study is also limited by the type of COVID-19 testing performed: RT-PCR is limited in its sensitivity (79%).9 This may have resulted in false-negative tests for our study group. However, none of the patients diagnosed with stress cardiomyopathy in the study group reported any symptoms suggestive of COVID-19–related illness.

This cohort study found a significant increase in the incidence of stress cardiomyopathy during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, no patients with stress cardiomyopathy were found to have COVID-19, suggesting an indirect, psychological, social, and economic pandemic-related stress mechanism behind the disease process.

Article Information

Accepted for Publication: June 11, 2020.

Published: July 9, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14780

Corresponding Author: Ankur Kalra, MD, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 224 W Exchange St, Ste 225, Akron, Ohio 44302 (kalraa@ccf.org).

Author Contributions: Drs Jabri and Kalra had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Drs Jabri and Kalra contributed equally to this work.

Concept and design: Jabri, Kalra, Alameh, Bashir, Khubber, Kanaa’N, Hedrick, Mehta, Puri, Reed.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Jabri, Kalra, Kumar, Alameh, Adroja, Nowacki, Shah, Kanaa’N, Hedrick, Sleik, Chung, Khot, Kapadia, Reed.

Drafting of the manuscript: Jabri, Kalra, Kumar, Alameh, Adroja, Bashir, Mehta, Reed.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Jabri, Kalra, Alameh, Bashir, Nowacki, Shah, Khubber, Kanaa’N, Hedrick, Sleik, Mehta, Chung, Khot, Kapadia, Puri, Reed.

Statistical analysis: Kalra, Kumar, Alameh, Bashir, Nowacki, Reed.

Obtained funding: Kalra.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Jabri, Kalra, Adroja, Bashir, Shah, Kanaa’N, Hedrick, Khot, Reed.

Supervision: Jabri, Kalra, Mehta, Khot, Kapadia, Puri, Reed.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Ghadri J-R , Wittstein IS , Prasad A , et al. International expert consensus document on Takotsubo syndrome (Part I): clinical characteristics, diagnostic criteria, and pathophysiology. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(22):2032-2046. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy076 PubMed Google Scholar Crossref

Mehta N , Kalra A , Nowacki AS , et al. Association of use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers with testing positive for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. Published online May 5, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1855 PubMed Google Scholar

Kurowski V , Kaiser A , von Hof K , et al. Apical and midventricular transient left ventricular dysfunction syndrome (tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy): frequency, mechanisms, and prognosis. Chest. 2007;132(3):809-816. doi:10.1378/chest.07-0608 PubMed Google Scholar Crossref