Systematics of tarsiers and lorises (original) (raw)

Abstract

It seems probable that there are more species (in the sense of sharply diagnosable entities) than hitherto recognized among small Asian primates, and contrasting to some degree with larger-sized taxa. This presumably relates to their lesser vagility and consequent reduced potential for gene-flow. Even where some gene-flow can be demonstrated, as between_Nycticebus coucang_ and_N. bengalensis_, this appears to be very limited and does not affect the essential homogeneity and diagnosability of the two taxa.

The biogeographic implications of the taxonomic findings of this study are noteworthy. They confirm the distinctness of Sulawesi in contrast to a Sundaland/southern Philippines link (Tarsius); the separation of the Indochinese and Sundaic faunal subregions (Nycticebus); and the uniqueness of the Sri Lankan “wet zone” (Loris). Much more work needs to be done on all three genera, but their great taxonomic interest, indicating much greater complexity than previously assumed, is apparent.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, Australian National University, 0200, Canberra, ACT, Australia
    Colin Groves

Authors

  1. Colin Groves
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Groves, C. Systematics of tarsiers and lorises.Primates 39, 13–27 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02557740

Download citation

Key Words