On the relativistic velocity composition paradox and the Thomas rotation (original) (raw)
References
L. H. Thomas, “The motion of the spinning electron,”Nature117, 514 (1926). Google Scholar
L. H. Thomas, “The kinematics of an electron with an axis,”Phil. Mag.3, 1–22 (1927). Google Scholar
L. H. Thomas, “Recollections of the discovery of the Thomas precessional frequency,”AIP Conference Proceedings, No. 95 (High Energy Spin Physics), G. M. Bunce, ed. (Brookhaven National Laboratory, 1982), pp. 4-12.
A. A. Ungar, “The relativistic velocity composition paradox and the Thomas rotation,”Found. Phys.19, 1385–1396 (1989). Google Scholar
G. P. Sastry, “Is Length contraction really paradoxical?,”Am. J. Phys.55, 943–945 (1987). Google Scholar
C. I. Mocanu, “Some difficulties within the framework of relativistic electrodynamics,”Arch. Elektrotech.69, 97–110 (1986). Google Scholar
A. A. Ungar, “Thomas rotation and the parametrization of the Lorentz transformation group,”Found. Phys. Lett.1, 57–89 (1988). Google Scholar
A. A. Ungar, “The Thomas rotation formalism underlying a non-associative group structure for relativistic velocities,”Appl. Math. Lett.1, 403–405 (1988). Google Scholar
A. A. Ungar, “The relativistic non-commutative non-associative group of velocities and the Thomas rotation,”Results in Mathematics16, 168–179 (1989). Google Scholar
A. A. Ungar, “Axiomatic approach to the non-associative group of relativistic velocities,”Found Phys. Lett.2, 199–203 (1989). Google Scholar
A. A. Ungar, “Weakly associative groups,”Results in Mathematics17, 149–168 (1990). Google Scholar
A. A. Ungar, “Thomas precession and its associated group - like structure,”Am. J. Phys.54, 824–834 (1991). Google Scholar
A. A. Ungar, “Quasidirect product groups and the Lorentz transformation group,” in T. M. Rassias, ed.Constantin Caratheodory: An International Tribute (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991), pp. 1378–1392. Google Scholar
A. A. Ungar, “Successive Lorentz transformations of the electromagnetic field,”Found. Phys.21, 569–589 (1991). Google Scholar
A. Einstein,Sidelights on relativity (Methuen, London, 1922).
R. P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton, M. Sands,The Feynman Lectures (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1964), Vol. II, Sec. 17-4. Google Scholar
M. C. Møller,The Theory of Relativity (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1952). Google Scholar
W. Rindler,Special Relativity (Oliver & Boyd, London, 1986). Google Scholar
S. Ben-Menahem, “The Thomas precession and velocity space curvature,”J. Math. Phys.27, 1234–1296 (1986). Google Scholar
S. Ben-Menahem, “Wigner rotation revisited,”Am. J. Phys.53, 62–66 (1985). Google Scholar
S. Dencoff and D. R. Inglis, “On the Thomas precession of accelerated axes,”Phys. Rev.50, 784 (1936). Google Scholar
G. P. Fisher, “The Thomas precession,”Am. J. Phys.40, 1772–1781 (1972). Google Scholar
W. H. Furry, “Lorentz transformation and the Thomas precession,”Am. J. Phys.23, 517–525 (1955). Google Scholar
A. C. Hirshfeld and Metzger, “A simple formula for combining rotations and Lorentz boosts,”Am. J. Phys.54, 550–552 (1986). Google Scholar
E. G. P. Rowe, “The Thomas precession,”Eur. J. Phys.5, 40–45 (1984). Google Scholar
N. Salingaros, “The Lorentz group and the Thomas precession: Exact results for the product of two boosts,”J. Math. Phys.27, 157–162 (1986); also “Erratum: The Lorentz,J. Math. Phys.29, 1265 (1988). Google Scholar
David Shelupsky, “Derivation of the Thomas precession formula,”Am. J. Phys.35, 650–651 (1967). Google Scholar
Thomas Phipps,Heretical Verities: Mathematical Themes in Physical Description (Classical Non-Fiction Library, Box 926 Urbana, Illinois 61801, 1986). Google Scholar
M. E. Noz and Y. S.Kim, Special Relativity and Quantum Theory (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1988). Google Scholar