Dilemmas in a general theory of planning (original) (raw)
Abstract
The search for scientific bases for confronting problems of social policy is bound to fail, becuase of the nature of these problems. They are “wicked” problems, whereas science has developed to deal with “tame” problems. Policy problems cannot be definitively described. Moreover, in a pluralistic society there is nothing like the undisputable public good; there is no objective definition of equity; policies that respond to social problems cannot be meaningfully correct or false; and it makes no sense to talk about “optimal solutions” to social problems unless severe qualifications are imposed first. Even worse, there are no “solutions” in the sense of definitive and objective answers.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
- Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
- Cancel anytime View plans
Buy Now
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley
Horst W. J. Rittel (Professor of the Science of Design) & Melvin M. Webber (Professor of City Planning)
Authors
- Horst W. J. Rittel
- Melvin M. Webber
Additional information
This is a modification of a paper presented to the Panel on Policy Sciences, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Boston, December 1969.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rittel, H.W.J., Webber, M.M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning.Policy Sci 4, 155–169 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
- Issue date: June 1973
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730