Ethical challenges of edtech, big data and personalized learning: twenty-first century student sorting and tracking (original) (raw)
References
Alarcon, A., Zeide, E., Rosenblat, A., Wikelius, K., boyd, d., Gangadharan, S. P., & Yu, C. (2014). Data & Civil Rights: Education primer, produced for Data & Civil Rights Conference. Accessed March 15, 2016, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2542268.
Baltodano, M. (2017). The power brokers of neoliberalism: Philanthrocapitalists and public education. Policy Futures in Education, 15(2), 141–156. Article Google Scholar
Barocas, S., & Nissenbaum, H. (2014). Big data’s end run around anonymity and consent. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, big data, and the public good: Frameworks for engagement (p. 44). New York: Cambridge University Press. Chapter Google Scholar
Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2016). Big data’s disparate impact. California Law Review 104, 671–732. Google Scholar
Bennett, C. J. (1992). Regulating privacy: Data protection and public policy in Europe and the United States. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar
Bienkowski, M., Feng, M., & Means, B. (2012). Enhancing teaching and learning through educational analytics and data mining. Center for Technology and Learning, SRI International. Accessed March 1, 2018, from https://tech.ed.gov/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/edm-la-brief.pdf.
Boninger, F., Molnar, A., & Murray, K. (2017). Asleep at the Switch: Schoolhouse commercialism, student privacy, and the failure of policymaking. National Education Policy Center: Report on Schoolhouse Commercialization Trends. Accessed February 1, 2018, from http://nepc.colorado.edu/files/publications/RB%20Trends%202017_2.pdf.
Bulger, M., McCormick, P., & Pitcan, M. (2017). The legacy of inBloom, Working Paper 02.02.2017. Data and Society Research Institute. Accessed February 3, 2018, from https://datasociety.net/pubs/ecl/InBloom_feb_2017.pdf.
Citron, D. K., & Pasquale, F. (2014). The scored society: Due process for automated predictions. Washington Law Review, 89, 101–133. Google Scholar
Cohen, J. E. (2000). Examined lives: Informational privacy and the subject as object. Stanford Law Review, 52, 1373–1438. Article Google Scholar
Crawford, K., & Schultz, J. (2014). Big data and due process: Toward a framework to redress predictive privacy harms. Boston College Law Review, 55, 93–128. Google Scholar
English, W. (2016). Two cheers for nudging. Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy, 14, 829–840. Google Scholar
Flaherty, D. (1989). Protecting privacy in surveillance societies: The Federal Republic of Germany, Sweden, France, Canada, and the United States. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. Google Scholar
Future of Privacy Forum and Software & Information Industry Association. (2018). K-12 school service provider pledge to safeguard student privacy. Accessed August 20, 2018, from https://studentprivacypledge.org/privacy-pledge/.
Gellman, R. M. (1993). Fragmented, incomplete, and discontinuous: The failure of federal privacy regulatory proposals and institutions. Software Law Journal, 6, 199. Google Scholar
Hartzog, W., & Selinger, E. (2013a). Big data in small hands. Stanford Law Review Online, 66, 81–88. Google Scholar
Kelly, J. T. (2016). Non-paternalist nudges. Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy, 14, 807–816. Google Scholar
Kerr, I., & Earle, J. (2013). Prediction, preemption, presumption: How big data threatens big picture privacy. Stanford Law Review Online, 66, 65–72. Google Scholar
Mirel, J. (2006). The traditional high school: Historical debates over its nature and function, Education Next (Winter) Vol 6, No. 1, pp. 14–21. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ763310. Accessed 1 March 2016.
Ohm, P. (2014). General principles for data use and analysis. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, big data, and the public good: Frameworks for engagement (pp. 96–111). New York: Cambridge University Press. Chapter Google Scholar
Pane, J. F., Steiner, E. D., Baird, M. D., Hamilton, L. S., & Pane, J. D. (2017). Informing progress: Insights on personalized learning implementation and effects. RAND Report. Accessed February 13, 2018, from https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2042.html.
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. New York: Penguin Books. Google Scholar
Regan, P. M. (1995). Legislating privacy: Technology, social values, and public policy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. Google Scholar
Regan, P. M. (2017). Big data and privacy. In J. Bachner, K. W. Hill, & B. Ginsberg (Eds.), Analytics, policy and governance. New Haven: Yale University Press. Google Scholar
Regan, P. M., & Bailey, J. (2018). Big data, privacy and education applications. In Presented at Surveillance Studies Network Conference, June 2018. Denmark: Aarhus University.
Regan, P. M., & Khwaja, E. T. (2017). Ethical implementation of big data in education: Policy and practices in the US and Canada. In Presented at the Law and Society Association Annual Conference, June 2017, Mexico City.
Roberts-Mahoney, H., Means, A. J., & Garrison, M. J. (2016). Netflixing human capital development: Personalized learning technology and the corporatization of K-12 education, Journal of Education Policy 1–16.
Sweeney, L., Abu, A., & Winn, J. (2013). Identifying participants in the personal genome project by name, Harvard University Data Privacy Lab, White Paper 1021-1 (April 24). Accessed December 10, 2015, from http://dataprivacylab.org/projects/pgp/1021-1.pdf.
Tene, O., & Polonetsky, J. (2013). Big data for all: Privacy and user control in the age of analytics. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 11(5), 239–273,253. Google Scholar