New Electroweak Formulation Fundamentally Accounting for the Effect Known as “Maximal Parity-Violation” (original) (raw)
Abstract
The electroweak scheme is wholly recast, in the framework of a relativistic quantum field formalism being a covariant fermion–antifermion extension of the usual one for massive spin-\(\frac{1}{2}\) point fermions. The new formalism is able to reread the “maximal _P_-violation” effect in a way restoring P and C symmetries themselves: it provides a natural “chiral field” approach, which gives evidence of the existence of a pseudoscalar (extra) charge variety anticommuting with the scalar (ordinary) one and just underlying the “maximally _P_-violating” phenomenology. Its zero-mass limit leads to a strict “chiral” particle theory, which remodels any massless spin-\(\frac{1}{2}\) fermion and corresponding antifermion as two mere pseudoscalar-charge eigenstates being the simple mirror images of each other. On such a basis, the (zero-mass) electroweak primary fermions are all redefined to be (only left-handed) “chiral” particles (with right-handed complements just standing for their antiparticles) and to carry at most scalar charges subjected as yet to a maximal uncertainty in sign: it is only by acquiring mass, and by gaining an extra helicity freedom degree, that they now may also manifest themselves as “Dirac” particles, with sharp scalar-charge eigenvalues. The fermion-mass appearance is thus made herein a dynamical condition strictly necessary to obtain actual superselected scalar-charge (and first, electric-charge) eigenstates. A pure “internal” mass-generating mechanism, relying only on would-be-Goldstone bosons (even to yield fermion masses) and no longer including an “external” Higgs contribution, is adopted accordingly. This is shown to be a self-consistent mechanism, which still maintains both renormalizability and unitarity. It involves a _P_-breaking in the neutral-weak-current sector (due to the Weinberg mixing) while it leaves the charged-current couplings truly _P_-invariant even in the presence of a (standardly parametrized) _CP_-violation.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime Subscribe now
Buy Now
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
- Aitchison, I. J. R. and Hey, A. J. G. (1984). Gauge Theories in Particle Physics, Adam Hilger, Bristol, pp. 11–16.
MATH Google Scholar - Ambler, E., Hayward, R. W., Hoppes, D. D., Hudson, R. R., and Wu, C. S. (1957). Physical Review 105, 1413.
Article ADS Google Scholar - Barut, A. O. (1972). Physics Letters B 38, 97.
Article ADS Google Scholar - Barut, A. O. (1973). Physics Letters B 46, 81.
Article MathSciNet ADS Google Scholar - Barut, A. O. (1982). Foundations of Physics 13, 7.
Article ADS Google Scholar - Barut, A. O. and Ziino, G. (1993). Modern Physics Letters A 8, 1011.
Article ADS Google Scholar - Cheng, T. P. and Li, L. F. (1984). Gauge Theory of Elementary Particle Physics, Oxford University Press, New York, p. 246.
Google Scholar - Costa de Beauregard, O. (1982). Foundations of Physics 12, 861.
Article MathSciNet ADS Google Scholar - Costa de Beauregard, O. (1984). In The Wave-Particle Dualism, S. Diner et al. eds. D. Reidel, p. 485.
- Feynman, R. P. (1949). Physical Review 76, 769.
Article MATH MathSciNet ADS Google Scholar - Feynman, R. P. and Gell-Mann, M. (1958). Physical Review 109, 193.
Article MATH MathSciNet ADS Google Scholar - Glashow, S. L. (1961). Nuclear Physics 22, 579.
Article ADS Google Scholar - Goldstone, J. (1961). Nuovo Cimento 19, 154
MATH MathSciNet Google Scholar - Goldstone, J., Salam, A., and Weinberg, S. (1962). Physical Review 127, 965.
Article MATH MathSciNet ADS Google Scholar - Halzen, F. and Martin, A. D. (1984). Quarks and Leptons, J. Wiley & Sons.
- Kobayashi, M. and Maskawa, M. (1973). Progress of Theoretical Physics 49, 652.
Article ADS Google Scholar - Landau, L. D. (1957). Nuclear Physics 3, 127.
Article MathSciNet ADS Google Scholar - Lee, T. D. and Yang, C. N. (1956). Physical Review 104, 254.
Article ADS Google Scholar - Lee, T. D. and Yang, C. N. (1957). Physical Review 105, 1671.
Article MathSciNet ADS Google Scholar - Majorana, E. (1937). Nuovo Cimento 14, 171.
MATH Google Scholar - Marshak, R. E. and Sudarshan, E. C. G. (1958). Physical Review 109, 1860.
Article ADS Google Scholar - Mohapatra, R. N. and Pati, J. C. (1975). Physical Review D 11, 566.
Article ADS Google Scholar - Narlikar, J. V. and Padmanabhan, T. (1986). Gravity, Gauge Theories and Quantum Cosmology, D. Reidel, p. 129.
- Recami, E. and Ziino, G. (1976). Nuovo Cimento A 33, 205.
ADS Google Scholar - Ross, G. G. (1993). Contemporary Physics 34, 79.
ADS Google Scholar - Sakurai, J. J. (1958). Nuovo Cimento 7, 649.
Google Scholar - Salam, A. (1957). Nuovo Cimento 5, 299.
Article MathSciNet Google Scholar - Salam, A. (1968). In Elementary Particle Theory, N. Svartholm ed. Almquist and Wiksell, Stockholm, p. 367.
Google Scholar - Stüeckelberg, E. C. G. (1948). Physical Review 74, 218.
Google Scholar - Tiomno, J. (1955). Nuovo Cimento 1, 226.
MATH MathSciNet Google Scholar - Weinberg, S. (1967). Physical Review Letters 19, 1264.
Article ADS Google Scholar - Weyl, H. (1929). Zeitschrift fur Physik 56, 330.
Article MATH ADS Google Scholar - Ziino, G. (1996). International Journal of Modern Physics A 11, 2081.
Article MATH MathSciNet ADS Google Scholar - Ziino, G. (2000). International Journal of Theoretical Physics 39, 51.
Article MathSciNet Google Scholar - Ziino, G. (2003). Hadronic Journal 26, 655.
Google Scholar
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
- Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche e Astronomiche, Universit` di Palermo, via Archirafi 36, I-90123, Palermo, Italy
G. Ziino
Authors
- G. Ziino
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence toG. Ziino.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ziino, G. New Electroweak Formulation Fundamentally Accounting for the Effect Known as “Maximal Parity-Violation”.Int J Theor Phys 45, 1993–2050 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-006-9168-2
- Received: 12 December 2005
- Accepted: 20 March 2006
- Published: 06 June 2006
- Issue Date: November 2006
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-006-9168-2