Punctuated Equilibrium, Moral Panics and the Ethics Review Process (original) (raw)
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
- Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
- Cancel anytime View plans
Buy Now
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Instant access to the full article PDF.
References
- American Anthropological Association (2003). Statement on the confidentiality of field notes adopted by the AAA executive board March 10, 2003, Anthropology News 44(4).
- American Association of University Professors (2001). Protecting Human Beings: Institutional Review Boards and Social Science Research. Washington, DC: American Association of University Professors. http://www.aaup.org/irbdoc.htm
- Bruner, E.M. (2004, January). Ethnographic practice and human subjects review, Anthropology News p. 10.
- Chalmers, D. and Pettit, P. (1998). Towards a consensual culture in the ethical review of research, eMJA 169, 79–82. http://www.mja.com.au/public/issue/jan19/chalmers/chalmers.html
- Clinton, W.J. (1994). Memorandum for the Vice President, the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies: Review of Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects. Washington, District of Columbia: U. S. Government.
Google Scholar - Cohen, S. (1972). Folk Devils and Moral Panic: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Google Scholar - Cohen, S. (1980). Folk Devils and Moral Panic: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Google Scholar - Coney, S. (Ed.) (1993). Unfinished Business: What Happened to the Cartwright Report? Auckland: Women's Health Action.
Google Scholar - Fitzgerald, M.H. (1994). Negotiating human ethics committees in Australia, Society for Applied Anthropology Newsletter 5(4), 3–5.
Google Scholar - Fitzgerald, M.H. (2004). Big basket or mission creep? Professional Ethics Report XVII(2), 1–3. http://www.aaas.org/spp/sfrl/per/per.htm
Google Scholar - Fluehr-Lobban, C. (2003a). Darkness in El Dorado: Research ethics, then and now. In C. Fluehr-Lobban (Ed.), Ethics and the Profession of Anthropology: Dialogue for Ethically Conscious Practice 2nd ed. Walnut Creek: Altamira, pp. 85–106.
Google Scholar - Fluehr-Lobban, C. (2003b). Ethics and anthropology 1890–2000: A review of issues and principles. In C. Fluehr-Lobban (Ed.), Ethics and the Profession of Anthropology: Dialogue for Ethically Conscious Practice 2nd ed. Walnut Creek: Altamira, pp. 1–28.
Google Scholar - Gelsinger, P. (2003). Foreword: Jesse's intent. In R. Amdur (Ed.), Institutional Review Board: Member Handbook. Sudbury, Massachusetts: Jones and Bartlett, pp. xv–xxiii.
Google Scholar - Gersick, C.J.G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development, Academy of Management Journal 31(1), 9–41.
Article Google Scholar - Gunsalus, C.K. (2003). Human subject regulations: Whom are we protecting from what, and why? Working to align incentives with ethical goals. Professional Ethics Report XVI(2), 1–3.
Google Scholar - Haggerty, K.D. (2004). Ethics creep: Governing social science research in the name of ethics, Qualitative Sociology 27(4), 391–414.
Article Google Scholar - Humphreys, L. (1970). Tearoom Trade: Impersonal Sex in Public Places. Chicago: Aldine.
Google Scholar - Israel, M. (2004). Ethics and the Governance of Criminological Research in Australia. Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, Attorney General's Department. www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/bocsar.
Google Scholar - Lowman, J. and Palys, T. (2000). Ethics and institutional conflict of interest: The research confidentiality controversy at Simon Fraser University, Sociological Practice: A Journal of Clinical and Applied Sociology 2(4), 245–264.
Article Google Scholar - National Research Council. (2003). Protecting participants and facilitating social and behavioral sciences research. In C.F. Citro, D.R. Ilgen, C.B. Marrett (Eds.), Committee on National Statistics and Board of Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences. Washington, District of Columbia.: Panel on Institutional Review Boards, Survey, and Social Sciences Research.
Google Scholar - Nicholson, R.H. (2003). The regulation of medical research: A historical overview. In S. Eckstein (Ed.), Manual for Research Ethics Committees 6th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 18–21.
Google Scholar - Nie, J.-B. (2003). Let's never stop bashing inhumanity: A reply to Frank Leavitt and an appeal for further ethical studies on Japanese doctors' wartime experimentation, Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 13, 162–166.
Google Scholar - Nie, J.-B. (2004). The West's dismissal of the Khabarovsk trial as ‘communist propaganda’: Ideology, evidence and international bioethics, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 1(1), 32–42.
Article PubMed Google Scholar - Pettit, P. (1992). Instituting a research ethic: Chilling and cautionary tales. Bioethics 6(2), 89–112.
Article Google Scholar - Philips, M.J. (1990). Damaged goods: Oral narratives of the experience of disability in American culture, Social Science and Medicine 30(8), 849–857.
Article PubMed Google Scholar - Putney, S.B. and Gruskin, S. (2002). Time, place, and consciousness: Three dimensions of meaning for US institutional review boards, American Journal of Public Health 92(7), 1067–1070.
Article PubMed Google Scholar - Romanelli, E. & Tushman, M.L. (1994). Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: An empirical test, Academy of Management Journal 37(5), 1141–1166.
Article Google Scholar - Savulescu, J. (2002). Two deaths and two lessons: Is it time to review the structure and function of research ethics committees? Journal of Medical Ethics 28, 1–2.
Article PubMed Google Scholar - Social Sciences and Humanities Research Ethics Special Working Committee (SSHWC) (2004). Giving Voice to the Spectrum: Report of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Ethics Special Working Committee. Ottawa: Interagency Advisory Panel and Secretariat on Research Ethics. http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/english/workgroups/sshwc.cfm
Google Scholar - Tierney, P. (2000). Darkness in El Dorado, How Scientists and Journalists Devastated the Amazon. New York: W. W. Horton.
Google Scholar - van den Hoonaard, W.C. (2001). Is research-ethics review a moral panic? The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 38(1), 19–36.
Article Google Scholar - Weisz, G. (1990). Introduction. In G. Weisz (Ed.), Social Science Perspectives on Medical Ethics. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 3–15.
Google Scholar