Defining a Family of Cognitive Diagnosis Models Using Log-Linear Models with Latent Variables (original) (raw)

References

• Agresti, A. (1990). Categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.
  Google Scholar
• Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716–723.
  Article Google Scholar
• de la Torre, J., & Douglas, J.A. (2004). Higher order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis. Psychometrika, 69, 333–353.
  Article Google Scholar
• DiBello, L., Stout, W., & Roussos, L. (2007). Cognitive diagnosis Part I. In C.R. Rao & S. Sinharay (Eds.), Handbook of statistics : Vol. 26. Psychometrics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  Google Scholar
• Embretson, S. (1985). Studying intelligence with test theory models. In Current topics in human intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 98–140).
• Fischer, G., & Forman, A. (1982). Some Applications of Logistic Latent Trait Models with Linear Constraints on the Parameters. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6(4), 397–416.
  Google Scholar
• Fu, J. (2005). A polytomous extension of the fusion model and its Bayesian parameter estimation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
• Gelman, A., Carlin, J., Stern, H., & Rubin, D. (1995). Bayesian data analysis. London: Chapman & Hall.
  Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., Meng, X., & Stern, H. (1996). Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies. Statistica Sinica, 6, 733–807.
  Google Scholar
• Haberman, S.J. (1974). Loglinear models for frequency tables derived by indirect observation: Maximum likelihood equations. Annals of Statistics, 2, 911–924.
  Article Google Scholar
• Haberman, S.J. (1979). Qualitative data analysis: Vol. 2. New developments. New York: Academic Press.
  Google Scholar
• Haertel, E.H. (1989). Using restricted latent class models to map the skill structure of achievement items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26, 333–352.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hagenaars, J. (1993). Loglinear models with latent variables. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  Google Scholar
• Hartz, S. (2002) A Bayesian framework for the unified model for assessing cognitive abilities: Blending theory with practicality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
• Jang, E. (2005) A validity narrative: Effects of reading skills diagnosis on teaching and learning in the context of NG TOEFL. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
• Janssen, R., & DeBoeck, P. (1997). Psychometric modeling of componentially designed synonym tasks. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 37–50.
  Article Google Scholar
• Junker, B.W., & Sijtsma, K. (2001). Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions, and connections with nonparametric item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 258–272.
  Article Google Scholar
• Lynch, S., & Western, B. (2004). Bayesian posterior predictive checks for complex models. Sociological Methods and Research, 32, 302–335.
  Article Google Scholar
• Macready, G.B., & Dayton, C.M. (1977). The use of probabilistic models in the assessment of mastery. Journal of Education Statistics, 33, 379–416.
  Google Scholar
• Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (1998–2006). Mplus user’s guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
  Google Scholar
• Rindskopf, D. (1983). Ageneral framework for using latent class analysis to test hierarchical and non hierarchical learning models. Psychometrika, 48, 85–97.
  Article Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464.
  Article Google Scholar
• Tatsuoka, K.K. (1990). Toward an integration of item-response theory and cognitive error diagnosis. In N. Frederiksen, R. Glaser, A. Lesgold, & M. Shafto (Eds.), Diagnostic monitoring of skill and knowledge acquisition. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
• Templin, J. (2004). Generalized linear mixed proficiency models for cognitive diagnosis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
• Templin, J., & Henson, R. (2006). Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models. Psychological Methods, 11(3), 287–305.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Templin, J., Henson, R., & Douglas, J. (2006). General theory and estimation of cognitive diagnosis models: Using Mplus to derive model estimates. 2007 National Council on Measurement in Education training session, Chicago, Illinois.
• Templin, J., Henson, R., & Douglas, J. (2008). General theory and estimation of cognitive diagnosis models as constrained latent class models. Manuscript under review.
• Templin, J., Henson, R., Templin, S., & Roussos, L. (in press). Robustness of hierarchical modeling of attribute correlation in cognitive diagnosis models. Applied Psychological Measurement.
• Vermunt, J.K., & Magidson, J. (2005). Technical guide for latent GOLD choice 4.0: Basic and advanced. Belmont: Statistical Innovations.
  Google Scholar
• von Davier, M. (2005). A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data (ETS Research Report RR-05-16).

Download references