How to Approach Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: An Otolaryngology Perspective (original) (raw)

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Gregory N. Postma, M.D. and Stacey L. Halum. Laryngeal and pharyngeal complications of gastroesophageal reflux disease. GI Motility online (2006). 16 May 2006
  2. Book DT et al. Perspectives in laryngopharyngeal reflux: an international survey. Laryngoscope. 2002;112:1399–406.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Koufman JA et al. Prevalence in reflux in 113 consecutive patients with laryngeal and voice disorders. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;123:385–8.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Connor NP et al. Symptoms of extraesophageal reflux in a community-dwelling sample. J Voice. 2007;21(2):189–202.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Reulbach TR et al. Occult laryngeal pathology in a community-based cohort. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;124:448–50.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Koufman JA et al. Laryngopharyngeal reflux: position statement of the committee on speech, voice and swallowing disorders of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;217(1):32–5. Landmark paper establishing a position statement amongst Otolaryngologists with regards to diagnosis and management of LPR.
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Francis DO et al. High economic burden of caring for patients with suspected extraesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(6):905–11.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Altman KW et al. Changing impact of gastroesophageal reflux in medical and otolaryngology practice. Laryngoscope. 2005;115:1145–53. Study describing the epidemiology of LPR, including cost and economic burden of treatment in otolaryngology practices.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Johnston D et al. Receptor-mediated uptake of pepsin by laryngeal epithelial cells. Ann Otl Rhinol Laryngol. 2007;116(12):934–8.
    Article Google Scholar
  10. Samuels TL. Pepsin as a causal agent of inflammation during nonacidic reflux. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;141(5):559–63.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Johnston N. Pepsin in nonacidic reflux can damage hypopharyngeal epithelial cells. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2009;118(9):677–85.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Johnston N. Rationale for targeting pepsin in the treatment of reflux disease. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2010;119(8):547–58.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Balefsky PC. Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI). J Voice. 2002;16(2):274–7.
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Postma GN. Ambulatory pH monitoring methodology. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2000;109 Suppl 184:10–4.
    Google Scholar
  15. Balefsky PC. The validity and reliability of the reflux finding score (RFS). Laryngoscope. 2001;111(8):1313–7.
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Chang BA. The reliability of the reflux finding score among general otolaryngologists. J Voice. 2015;29(5):572–7.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Singendonk M. OP-5 interobserver validity of the reflux finding score for infants in flexible versus rigid laryngoscopy. J Pediatr Gasteroenterol Nutr. 2015;61(4):510–1.
    Article Google Scholar
  18. Hicks DM et al. The prevalence of hypopharynx findings associated with gastroesophageal reflux in normal volunteers. J Voice. 2002;16:564–79.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Milstein CF et al. Prevalence of laryngeal irritation signs associated with reflux in asymptomatic volunteers: impact of endoscopic technique (rigid vs. flexible laryngoscope). Laryngoscope. 2005;115(12):2256–61.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Branski R et al. Diagnostic accuracy of history, laryngoscopy, and stroboscopy. Laryngoscope. 2012;123:215–9.
    PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Karkos PD, Wilson JA, et al. Empiric treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux with proton pump inhibitors: a systematic review. Laryngoscope. 2006;116:144–8.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Reichel O et al. Double blinded placebo-controlled trial with esomeprazole for symptoms and signs associated with laryngopharyngeal reflux. Otolaryngol HNS. 2008;139:414–20.
    Google Scholar
  23. Park W et al. Laryngopharyngeal reflux: prospective cohort study evaluating optimal dose of proton-pump inhibitor therapy and pretherapy predictors of response. Laryngoscope. 2005;115:1230–8.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Jin BJ et al. Change of acoustic parameters before and after treatment in laryngopharyngeal reflux patients. Laryngoscope. 2008;118:938–41.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Noordzji JP et al. Correlation of pH probe-measured laryngopharyngeal reflux with symptoms and signs of reflux laryngitis. Laryngoscope. 2002;112:2191–5.
    Google Scholar
  26. Hamdan L et al. Effect of aggressive therapy on laryngeal symptoms and voice characteristics in patients with gastroesophageal reflux. Acta Otolaryngol. 2001;121:868–72.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Qadeer MA et al. Proton pump inhibitor therapy for suspected GERD-related chronic laryngitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Gastroentol. 2006;101:2646–54.
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  28. Heidelbaugh JJ. Proton pump inhibitors: are they overutilised in clinical practice and do they pose significant risk? Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66(6):582–91.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  29. Chandler B et al. 24 versus 48-hour Bravo pH monitoring. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012;46:197–200.
    Article Google Scholar
  30. Hirano R et al. ACG Practice Guidelines: Esophageal Reflux testing. Am J Gastro. 2007;102:668–85.
    Article Google Scholar
  31. DeMeester TR. A new technique for measurement of pharyngeal pH: Normal values and discriminating pH threshold. J Gastro Surg. 2009;12:1422–39.
    Google Scholar
  32. Friedman M. Impact of pH monitoring on laryngopharyngeal reflux treatment: improved compliance and symptom resolution. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;144(4):558–62.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  33. Muderris T. The clinical value of pharyngeal pH monitoring using a double-probe, triple-sensor catheter in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux. Arch Oto-HNS. 2009;135:163–7.
    Article Google Scholar
  34. Wiener GJ. Oropharyngeal pH monitoring for the detection of liquid and aerosolized supraesophageal gastric reflux. J Voice. 2009;23(4):498–504.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  35. Sharma N. An analysis of persistent symptoms in acid-suppressed patients undergoing impedance pH monitoring. Clinc Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6(5):521–4.
    Article Google Scholar
  36. Klein et al. Preliminary Comparison of an oropharyngeal aerosolized pH probe and a standard dual pH probe for diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux. Presented at the Annual Combine Otolaryngologic Spring Meeting (COSM) at the American Bronchoesophagological Association (ABEA) section 2007.
  37. Knight J. Sensitive pepsin immunoassay for detection of laryngopharyngeal reflux. Laryngoscope. 2005;115(8):1473–8.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  38. Wassenaar E. Pepsin detection in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux before and after fundoplication. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(12):3870–6.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  39. Hayat JO. Pepsin in saliva for the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Gut. 2015;64(3):373–80.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  40. Gooi Z, Ishman SL, Bock JM, Blumin JH, Akst LM. Changing patterns in reflux care: 10-year comparison of ABEA members. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015;124:940–6. One of the largest surveys evaluating multiple variables in the current practice patterns on LPR management.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Gooi Z, Ishman SL, Bock JM, Blumin JH, Akst LM. Laryngopharyngeal reflux: paradigms for evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2014;123(10):677–85.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  42. Sulica L. Hoarseness misattributed to reflux: sources and patterns of error. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2014;123(6):442–5.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  43. Schwartz SR, Cohen SM, Dailey SH, et al. Clinical practice guidelines: hoarseness (dysphonia). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;141:S1–31.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  44. Kahrilas P, Shaheen N, Vaezi M. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). 2008.
    Google Scholar
  45. Katz P, Gerson L, Vela M. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:308–28. The most recent guidelines that revisit the role of empiric PPI therapy in extraesophageal GERD.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar

Download references