Report on the Second Symbol Recognition Contest (original) (raw)
Abstract
Following the experience of the first edition of the international symbol recognition contest held during GREC’03 in Barcelona, a second edition has been organized during GREC’05. In this paper, first, we bring to mind the general principles of both contests before presenting more specifically the details of this last edition. In particular, we describe the dataset used in the contest, the methods that took part in it, and the analysis of the results obtained by the participants. We conclude with a synthesis of the contributions and lacks of these two editions, and some leads for the organization of a forthcoming contest.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
- Kong, B., Phillips, I.T., Haralick, R.M., Prasad, A., Kasturi, R.: A benchmark: Performance evaluation of dashed-line detection algorithms. In: Kasturi, R., Tombre, K. (eds.) Graphics Recognition 1995. LNCS, vol. 1072, pp. 270–285. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)
Chapter Google Scholar - Chhabra, A., Phillips, I.: The second international graphics recognition contest - raster to vector conversion: A report. In: Chhabra, A.K., Tombre, K. (eds.) GREC 1997. LNCS, vol. 1389, pp. 390–410. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
Chapter Google Scholar - Chhabra, A., Philips, I.: Performance evaluation of line drawing recognition systems. In: Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Barcelona, Spain, vol. 4, pp. 864–869 (2000)
Google Scholar - Liu, W., Zhai, J., Dori, D.: Extended summary of the arc segmentation contest. In: Blostein, D., Kwon, Y.-B. (eds.) GREC 2001. LNCS, vol. 2390, pp. 343–349. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Chapter Google Scholar - Aksoy, S., Ye, M., Schauf, M., Song, M., Wang, Y., Haralick, R., Parker, J., Pivovarov, J., Royko, D., Sun, C., Farneboock, G.: Algorithm performance contest. In: Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Barcelona, Spain, vol. 4, pp. 870–876 (2000)
Google Scholar - Valveny, E., Dosch, P.: Symbol recognition contest: a synthesis. In: Lladós, J., Kwon, Y.-B. (eds.) GREC 2003. LNCS, vol. 3088, pp. 368–385. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Chapter Google Scholar - Valveny, E., Dosch, P.: Performance Evaluation of Symbol Recognition. In: Marinai, S., Dengel, A.R. (eds.) DAS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3163, pp. 354–365. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Chapter Google Scholar - Kanungo, T., Haralick, R.M., Baird, H.S., Stuetzle, W., Madigan, D.: Document Degradation Models: Parameter Estimation and Model Validation. In: Proceedings of IAPR Workshop on Machine Vision Applications, Kawasaki (Japan), pp. 552–557 (1994)
Google Scholar
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
- Université Nancy 2, Loria (UMR 7503 CNRS-INPL-INRIA-Nancy 2-UHP), 615, rue du jardin botanique, B.P. 101, 54602 Cedex, Villers-lès-Nancy, France
Philippe Dosch - Computer Vision Center – Computer Science Department (UAB), Edifici O, Campus UAB, 08193, Bellaterra, Spain
Ernest Valveny
Authors
- Philippe Dosch
- Ernest Valveny
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
- Department of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Wenyin Liu - Computer Vision Center, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain
Josep Lladós
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dosch, P., Valveny, E. (2006). Report on the Second Symbol Recognition Contest. In: Liu, W., Lladós, J. (eds) Graphics Recognition. Ten Years Review and Future Perspectives. GREC 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3926. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11767978\_35
Download citation
- .RIS
- .ENW
- .BIB
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11767978\_35
- Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
- Print ISBN: 978-3-540-34711-8
- Online ISBN: 978-3-540-34712-5
- eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)Springer Nature Proceedings Computer Science
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.