Automatic Non-linear MRI-Ultrasound Registration for the Correction of Intra-operative Brain Deformations (original) (raw)

References

  1. D. L. Collins and A. C. Evans, “Animal: validation and applications of non-linear registration-based segmentation,” International Journal and Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 11, pp. 1271–1294, Dec 1997.
    Article Google Scholar
  2. N. Dorward, “Neuronavigation — the surgeon’s sextant,” British Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 11, pp. 101–103, 1997.
    Article Google Scholar
  3. J. Golfinos, B. Fitzpatrick, L. Smith and R. Spetzler, “Clinical use of a frameless stereotactic arm: result of 325 cases,” Neurosurgery, vol. 83, pp. 197–205, 1995.
    Article Google Scholar
  4. D. Hill, C. Maurer, R. Maciunas et al., “Measurement of intraoperative brain surface deformation under a craniotomy,” Neurosurgery, vol. 43, pp. 514–528, 1998.
    Article Google Scholar
  5. T. Paleologos, J. Wadley, N. Kitchen, and D. Thomas, “Clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of interactive image-guided craniotomy: clinical comparison between conventional and image-guided meningioma surgery,” Neurosurgery, vol. 47, pp. 40–48, 2000.
    Article Google Scholar
  6. C. Maurer, G. Aboutanos, B. Dawant et al., “Effect of geometrical distortion correction in MR on image registration accuracy,” Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 20, pp. 666–679, 1996.
    Article Google Scholar
  7. D. Roberts, A. Hartov, F. Kennedy et al., “Intraoperative brain shift and deformation: a quantatative analysis of cortical displacement in 28cases,” Neurosurgery, vol. 43, pp. 749–760, 1998.
    Article Google Scholar
  8. P. Black, E. Alexander, C. Martin et al., “Craniotomy for tumor treatment in an intraoperative magnetic resonance unit,” Neurosurgery, vol. 45, pp. 423–433, 1999.
    Article Google Scholar
  9. M. Bernstein, A. Al-Anazi, W. Kurcharczyk et al., “Brain tumor surgery with the Toronto open magnetic resonance imaging system: preliminary results for 36 patients and analysis of advantages, disadvantages, and future prospects,” Neurosurgery, pp. 900–907, 2000.
    Google Scholar
  10. D. Roberts, M. Miga, A. Hartov et al., “Intraoperatively updated neuroimaging using brain modeling and sparse data,” Neurosurgery, vol. 45, pp. 1199–1207, 1999.
    Article Google Scholar
  11. D. Roberts, M. Miga, A. Hartov et al., “Model-updated image guidance: Initial clinical experiences with gravity-induced brain deformation,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 18, pp. 866–874, Oct 1999.
    Article Google Scholar
  12. R. Comeau, A. Sadikot, A. Fenster, and T. Peters, “Intraoperative ultrasound for guidance and tissue shift correction in image-guided neurosurgery,” Medical Physics, vol. 27, pp. 787–800, 2000.
    Article Google Scholar
  13. J. Trobaugh, W. Richard, K. Smith, and R. Bucholz, “Frameless stereotactic ultrasonography: Methods and applications,” Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 18,no. 4, pp. 235–246, 1994.
    Article Google Scholar
  14. R. Bucholz, C. Sturm, and J. Henderson, “Detection of brain shift with an image guided ultrasound device,” Acta Neurochirurgica, vol. 138, p. 627, 1996.
    Google Scholar
  15. R. Bucholz, D. Yeh, J. Trobaugh et al., “The correction of stereotactic inaccuracy caused by brain shift using an intraoperative ultrasound device,” CVRMed-MRCAS, pp. 459–466, 1997.
    Google Scholar
  16. R. M. Comeau, A. Fenster, and T. Peters, “Intraoperative US in interactive imageguided neurosurgery,” Radiographics, vol. 19,no. 4, pp. 1019–1027, 1998.
    Google Scholar
  17. D. Gobbi, R. Comeau, and T. Peters, “Ultrasound/MRI overlay with image warping for neurosurgery,” in MICCAI 2000, (Pittsburgh, PA, USA), pp. 106–114, Oct. 2000.
    Google Scholar

Download references