Staging of Mouse Seminiferous Tubule Cross-Sections (original) (raw)

References

1. Leblond, C. P. and Clermont, Y. (1952) Definition of the stages of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium in the rat. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 55, 548–573.
   Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
2. Clermont, Y. and Perey, B. (1957) The stages of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium of the rat: practical definitions in PA-Schiff-hematoxylin stained sections. Rev. Canad. Biol. 16, 451–462.
   PubMed CAS Google Scholar
3. Oakberg, E. F. (1956) A description of spermiogenesis in the mouse and its use in analysis of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium and germ cell renewal. Am. J. Anat. 99, 391–413.
   Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
4. Hess, R. A. (1990) Quantitative and qualitative characteristics of the stages and transitions in the cycle of the rat seminiferous epithelium: light microscopic observations of perfusion-fixed and plastic-embedded testes. Biol. Reprod. 43, 525–542.
   Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
5. Russell, L. D., Ettlin, R. A., Hikim, A. P. S., and Clegg, E. D. (1990) Histological and histopathological evaluation of the testis, Cache River Press, Clearwater, Fl. USA.
   Google Scholar
6. de Rooij, D. G. (1973) Spermatogonial stem cell renewal in the mouse. I. Normal situation. Cell Tissue Kinet. 6, 281–287.
   PubMed Google Scholar
7. Tegelenbosch, R. A. and de Rooij, D. G. (1993) A quantitative study of spermatogonial multiplication and stem cell renewal in the C3H/101 F1 hybrid mouse. Mutat. Res. 290, 193–200.
   Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
8. de Rooij, D. G. (2001) Proliferation and differentiation of spermatogonial stem cells. Reproduction 121, 347–354.
   Article PubMed Google Scholar
9. Hamer, G., Gademan, I. S., Kal, H. B., and de Rooij, D. G. (2001) Role for c-Abl and p73 in the radiation response of male germ cells. Oncogene 20, 4298–4304.
   Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
10. Hamer, G., Kal, H. B., Westphal, C. H., Ashley, T., and de Rooij, D. G. (2004) Ataxia telangiectasia mutated expression and activation in the testis. Biol. Reprod. 70, 1206–1212.
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
11. de Vries, S. S., Baart, E. B., Dekker, M., Siezen, A., de Rooij, D. G., de Boer, P., and te Riele, H. (1999) Mouse MutS-like protein MSH5 is required for proper chromosome synapsis in male and female meiosis. Genes Dev. 13, 523–531.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
12. Barchi, M., Mahadevaiah, S., Di Giacomo, M., Baudat, F., de Rooij, D. G., Burgoyne, P. S., Jasin, M., and Keeney, S. (2005) Surveillance of different recombination defects in mouse spermatocytes yields distinct responses despite elimination at an identical developmental stage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 7203–7215.
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
13. Bolcun-Filas, E., Costa, Y., Speed, R., Taggart, M., Benavente, R., De Rooij, D. G., and Cooke, H. J. (2007) SYCE2 is required for synaptonemal complex assembly, double strand break repair, and homologous recombination. J. Cell. Biol. 176, 741–747.
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
14. Ahmed, E. A., van der Vaart, A., Barten, A., Kal, H. B., Chen, J., Lou, Z., Minter-Dykhouse, K., Bartkova, J., Bartek, J., de Boer, P., and de Rooij, D. G. (2007) Differences in DNA double strand breaks repair in male germ cell types: Lessons learned from a differential expression of Mdc1 and 53BP1. DNA Repair (Amst) 6, 1243–1254.
    Google Scholar
15. Carmell, M. A., Girard, A., van de Kant, H. J., Bourc'his, D., Bestor, T. H., de Rooij, D. G., and Hannon, G. J. (2007) MIWI2 is essential for spermatogenesis and repression of transposons in the mouse male germline. Dev. Cell 12, 503–514.
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
16. Ashley, T., Westphal, C., Plug-de Maggio, A., and de Rooij, D. G. (2004) The mammalian mid-pachytene checkpoint: meiotic arrest in spermatocytes with a mutation in Atm alone or in combination with a Trp53 (p53) or Cdkn1a (p21/cip1) mutation. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 107, 256–262.
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
17. de Rooij, D. G. (2003) Specific arrests of spermatogenesis in genetically modified and mutant mice. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 103, 267–276.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
18. Chiarini-Garcia, H. and Russell, L. D. (2001) High-resolution light microscopic characterization of mouse spermatogonia. Biol. Reprod. 65, 1170–1178.
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar

Download references