Latent Variables and Marketing Theory: The Paradigm Shift (original) (raw)
References
Bartels, R. (1951). Can marketing be a science? Journal of Marketing, 15, 319–328. Article Google Scholar
Bartholomew, D. J., Knott, M., & Moustaki, I. (2011). Latent variable models and factor analysis: A unified approach. Chichester: Wiley. BookMATH Google Scholar
Ben-Akiva, M., Mcfadden, D., Train, K., Walker, J., Bhat, C., Bierlaire, M., et al. (2002). Hybrid choice models: Progress and challenges. Marketing Letters, 13(3), 163–175. Article Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M. (1982). Linear systems with multiple levels and types of latent variables. In K. G. Jöreskog & H. Wold (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation: Causality, structure, prediction (Part I, pp. 101–130). Amsterdam: North-Holland. Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M., & Huang, W. (2014). On components, latent variables, PLS and simple methods: Reactions to Rigdon’s rethinking of PLS. Long Range Planning, 47, 138–145. Article Google Scholar
Bollen, K. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley. BookMATH Google Scholar
Bollen, K. (2002). Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 605–634. Google Scholar
Bollen, K., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 305–314. Article Google Scholar
Borsboom, D. (2008). Latent variable theory. Measurement, 6, 25–53. Google Scholar
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & Van Heerden, J. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psycholological Review, 110, 203–219. Article Google Scholar
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & Van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071. Article Google Scholar
Cadogan, J. W., & Lee, N. (2013). Improper use of endogenous formative variables. Journal of Business Research, 66, 233–241. Article Google Scholar
Diamantopoulos, A. (2008). Formative indicators: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Business Research, 61, 1201–1202. Article Google Scholar
Diamantopoulos, A., Riefler, P., & Roth, K. P. (2008). Advancing formative measurement models. Journal of Business Research, 61, 1203–1218. Article Google Scholar
Hunt, S. (1976). The nature and scope of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 40, 17–28. Article Google Scholar
Iacobucci, D., & Hopkins, N. (1992). Modeling dyadic interactions and networks in marketing. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 5–17. Article Google Scholar
Jones, D. G. B., Shaw, E. H., & Mclean P. A. (2010). The modern schools of marketing thought. In P. Maclaran, M. Saren, B. Stern, & M. Tadajewski (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of marketing theory (pp. 42–58). London: SAGE. Google Scholar
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford Press. Google Scholar
MacCallum, R., & Browne, M. (1993). The use of causal indicators in covariance structure models: Some practical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 533–541. Article Google Scholar
Mccloskey, D. (1983). The rhetoric of economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 21, 481–517. Google Scholar
Ping, R. A., Jr. (2004). On assuring valid measurement for theoretical models using survey data. Journal of Business Research, 57, 125–141. Article Google Scholar
Rigdon, E. (2014). Comment on “improper use of endogenous formative variables”. Journal of Business Research, 67, 2800–2802. Article Google Scholar
Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Strabub, D. W. (2012). A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 3–14. Google Scholar
Sagan, A. (2013). Market research and preference data. In M. A. Scott, J. S. Simonoff, & B. D. Marx (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of multilevel modeling (pp. 581–598). Los Angeles/London/Singapore: Sage. Chapter Google Scholar
Salzberger, T. (2009). Measurement in marketing research: An alternative framework. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar
Salzberger, T., & Koller, M. (2013). Towards a new paradigm of measurement in marketing. Journal of Business Research, 66, 1307–1317. Article Google Scholar
Shaw, E. H., & Jones, D. G. B. (2005). A history of schools of marketing thought. Marketing Theory, 3(3), 239–281. Article Google Scholar
Skrondal, A., & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2007). Latent variable modelling: A survey. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 34, 712–745. ArticleMathSciNetMATH Google Scholar
Steenkamp, J.-B., & Baumgartner, H. (2000). On the use of structural equation models for marketing modeling. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 17, 195–202. Article Google Scholar
Wilcox, J. B., Howell, R. D., & Breivik, E. (2008). Questions about formative measurement. Journal of Business Research, 61, 1219–1228. Article Google Scholar
Williams, L. J., Edwards, J. R., & Vanderberg, R. J. (2003). Recent advances in causal modeling methods for organizational and management. Journal of Management, 29(6), 903–936. Article Google Scholar
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2006). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. In R. F. Lusch, & S. L. Vargo (Eds.), The service dominant logic of marketing. Dialog, debate and directions. New York: Sharpe. Google Scholar