Exploring Linguistic and Graph Based Features for the Automatic Classification and Extraction of Adverse Drug Effects (original) (raw)

References

  1. Bate, A., et al.: A Bayesian neural network method for adverse drug reaction signal generation. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 54(4), 315–321 (1998)
    Article Google Scholar
  2. Bisgin, H., Liu, Z., Fang, H., Xu, X., Tong, W.: Mining FDA drug labels using an unsupervised learning technique-topic modeling. BMC Bioinform. 12(10), S11 (2011)
    Article Google Scholar
  3. Chang, C.-C., Lin, C.-J.: LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. (TIST) 2(3), 27 (2011)
    Google Scholar
  4. Chirawichitchai, N., Sa-nguansat, P., Meesad, P.: Developing an effective Thai document categorization framework base on term relevance frequency weighting. In: 2010 8th International Conference on ICT Knowledge Engineering, pp. 19–23. IEEE (2010)
    Google Scholar
  5. De Marneffe, M.-C., Manning, C.D.: The Stanford typed dependencies representation. In: Coling 2008: Proceedings of the Workshop on Cross-Framework and Cross-Domain Parser Evaluation, pp. 1–8. Association for Computational Linguistics (2008)
    Google Scholar
  6. Duan, K.-B., Rajapakse, J.C., Wang, H., Azuaje, F.: Multiple SVM-RFE for gene selection in cancer classification with expression data. IEEE Trans. Nanobiosci. 4(3), 228–234 (2005)
    Article Google Scholar
  7. DuMouchel, W.: Bayesian data mining in large frequency tables, with an application to the FDA spontaneous reporting system. Am. Stat. 53(3), 177–190 (1999)
    Google Scholar
  8. Eshleman, R., Singh, R.: Leveraging graph topology and semantic context for pharmacovigilance through Twitter-streams. BMC Bioinform. 17(13), 335 (2016)
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Gamon, M.: Graph-based text representation for novelty detection. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Graph Based Methods for Natural Language Processing, pp. 17–24. Association for Computational Linguistics (2006)
    Google Scholar
  10. Ginn, R., et al.: Mining Twitter for adverse drug reaction mentions: a corpus and classification benchmark. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Building and Evaluating Resources for Health and Biomedical Text Processing. Citeseer (2014)
    Google Scholar
  11. Gurulingappa, H., Mateen-Rajpu, A., Toldo, L.: Extraction of potential adverse drug events from medical case reports. J. Biomed. Semant. 3(1), 15 (2012)
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Gurulingappa, H., et al.: Development of a benchmark corpus to support the automatic extraction of drug-related adverse effects from medical case reports. J. Biomed. Inform. 45(5), 885–892 (2012)
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Huynh, T., He, Y., Willis, A., Rüger, S.: Adverse drug reaction classification with deep neural networks (2016)
    Google Scholar
  14. Lazarou, J., Pomeranz, B.H., Corey, P.N.: Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA 279(15), 1200–1205 (1998)
    Article Google Scholar
  15. Lindquist, M., Edwards, I.R., Bate, A., Fucik, H., Nunes, A.M., Ståhl, M.: From association to alert–a revised approach to international signal analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 8(S1), S15–S25 (1999)
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Liu, M., et al.: Comparative analysis of pharmacovigilance methods in the detection of adverse drug reactions using electronic medical records. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 20(3), 420–426 (2013)
    Article Google Scholar
  17. Mihalcea, R., Tarau, P.: TextRank: bringing order into texts. Association for Computational Linguistics (2004)
    Google Scholar
  18. Nikfarjam, A., Sarker, A., O’Connor, K., Ginn, R., Gonzalez, G.: Pharmacovigilance from social media: mining adverse drug reaction mentions using sequence labeling with word embedding cluster features. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocu041
  19. Pirmohamed, M., et al.: Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis of 18 820 patients. BMJ 329(7456), 15–19 (2004)
    Article Google Scholar
  20. Rastegar-Mojarad, M., Komandur Elayavilli, R., Yu, Y., Hiu, H.: Detecting signals in noisy data-can ensemble classifiers help identify adverse drug reaction in tweets. In: Proceedings of the Social Media Mining Shared Task Workshop at the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing (2016)
    Google Scholar
  21. Sarker, A., Nikfarjam, A., Gonzalez, G.: Social media mining shared task workshop. In: Proceedings of the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, pp. 581–592 (2016)
    Google Scholar
  22. Szarfman, A., Machado, S.G., O’Neill, R.T.: Use of screening algorithms and computer systems to efficiently signal higher-than-expected combinations of drugs and events in the us FDA’s spontaneous reports database. Drug Saf. 25(6), 381–392 (2002)
    Article Google Scholar
  23. Wang, X., Hripcsak, G., Markatou, M., Friedman, C.: Active computerized pharmacovigilance using natural language processing, statistics, and electronic health records: a feasibility study. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 16(3), 328–337 (2009)
    Article Google Scholar
  24. Zhang, Z., Nie, J., Zhang, X.: An ensemble method for binary classification of adverse drug reactions from social media. In: Proceedings of the Social Media Mining Shared Task Workshop at the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing (2016)
    Google Scholar

Download references