The orientation of the cervical vertebral column in unrestrained awake animals (original) (raw)

Summary

The orientation of the cervical vertebral column was studied by X-ray photography of the region containing the head and the neck in nine unrestrained species of vertebrates (man, monkey, cat, rabbit, guinea pig, rat, chicken, frog, lizard). In addition, the orientation of the horizontal semicircular canals was measured in four species using landmarks on the skull. In all vertebrates studied, with the exception of frog and lizard, the general orientation of the cervical vertebral column was vertical when animals were at rest, and not horizontal or oblique as suggested by the macroscopic appearance of the neck. The posture of the animal, whether lying, sitting or standing, had little effect on this general vertical orientation, although some variability was noticed depending on the species. This finding prompted the definition of a resting zone, where the cervical column can take any orientation within a narrow range around a mean position. The cervical vertebral column composes part of the S-shaped structure of the entire vertebral column, with one inflection around the cervico-thoracic (C7/Th1) junction. This feature is already noticable in the lizard. The vertical orientation of the cervical vertebral column is interpreted to provide a stable and energy saving balance of the head. Furthermore, when the head is lowered or raised, the atlantooccipital and cervico-thoracic junctions are predominantly involved, while the entire cervical column largely preserves its intrinsic configuration. The curved configuration of the cervico-thoracic vertebral column embedded in long spring-like muscles is interpreted to function as a shock absorber. At rest, animals did not hold their heads with the horizontal canals oriented earth horizontally all the time, but often maintained them pitched up by ca. 5 deg, as has been reported for man. At other times, presumably when the vigilance level increased, the horizontal canals were brought into the earth horizontal plane. The vertical orientation of the cervical column results in a vertical positioning of the odontoid process of the axis (second cervical vertebra, C2), which thus provides the axis of rotation for yaw movements of the head. This axis corresponds to that of the horizontal semicircular canals. The vertical organization of the cervical vertebral column in birds and mammals, whether the animal is quadrupedal or bipedal, points to a common organizational principle for eye and head movement systems. These movements may be subserved by common neuronal elements controlling gaze and related reflexes (vestibular, optokinetic, cervical), with parallel rotational axes of the head, the horizontal semicircular canals, and the horizontal extraocular muscles.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Physiology and Biophysics, New York University Medical Center, 550 First Ave., 10016, New York, NY, USA
    P. P. Vidal
  2. The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Ave., 10021, New York, NY, USA
    W. Graf
  3. Laboratoire de Physiologie Neurosensorielle du C.N.R.S., 15, Rue de l'Ecole de Médecine, F-75270, Paris Cédex 06, France
    A. Berthoz

Authors

  1. P. P. Vidal
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. W. Graf
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. A. Berthoz
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Supported by NIH grant EY04613, the Fondation Cino del Duca and the Fondation de la Recherche Médical Française

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vidal, P.P., Graf, W. & Berthoz, A. The orientation of the cervical vertebral column in unrestrained awake animals.Exp Brain Res 61, 549–559 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00237580

Download citation

Key words