Monophyly or polyphyly of the order Rodentia: Possible conflict between morphological and molecular interpretations (original) (raw)
Literature cited
Allard, M. W., Miyamoto, M. M., and Honeycutt, R. L. (1991). Tests for rodent polyphyly.Nature353 610–611. Google Scholar
Andrews, P. (1988). A phylogenetic analysis of the Primates. In Benton, M. J. (ed.),The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods, Vol. 2. Mammals, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 143–175. Google Scholar
Beintema, J. J. (1985). Amino acid sequence data and evolutionary relationships among hystricognaths and other rodents. In Luckett, W. P., and Hartenberger, J.-L. (eds.),Evolutionary Relationships Among Rodents, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 549–565. Google Scholar
Beintema, J. J., and Campagne, R. N. (1987). Molecular evolution of rodent insulins.Mol. Biol. Evol.4 10–18. Google Scholar
Beintema, J. J., and Lenstra, J. A. (1982). Evolution of mammalian pancreatic ribonucleases. In Goodman, M. (ed.),Macromolecular Sequences in Systematic and Evolutionary Biology, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 43–73. Google Scholar
Beintema, J. J., Fitch, W. M., and Carsana, A. (1986). Molecular evolution of pancreatic-type ribonucleases.Mol. Biol. Evol.3 262–275. Google Scholar
Beintema, J. J., Rodewald, K., Braunitzer, G., Czelusniak, J., and Goodman, M. (1991). Studies on the phylogenetic position of the Ctenodactylidae (Rodentia).Mol. Biol. Evol.8 151–154. Google Scholar
Brandt, J. F. (1855). Beiträge zur nähern Kenntniss der Säugethiere Russlands.Mém. Acad. Imp. Sci. Pétersbourg6(9): 1–375. Google Scholar
Carleton, M. D. (1984). Introduction to rodents. In Anderson, S., and Jones, J. K., Jr. (eds.),Orders and Families of Recent Mammals, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 255–265. Google Scholar
Cuvier, G. (1800–1805).Leçons d'Anatomie Comparée, 5 vol., Baudouin, Paris. Google Scholar
Czelusniak, J., Goodman, M., Koop, B. F., Tagle, D. A., Shoshani, J., Braunitzer, G., Kleinschmidt, T. K., De Jong, W. W., and Matsuda, G. (1990). Perspectives from amino acid and nucleotide sequences on cladistic relationships among higher taxa of Eutheria. In Genoways, H. H. (ed.),Current Mammalogy, Vol. 2, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 545–572. Google Scholar
De Blainville, H. M. D. (1816). Prodrome d'une nouvelle distribution systématique du règne animal.Bull. Sci. Soc. Philom. Paris Sér. 33 105–124. Google Scholar
De Jong, W. W. (1985). Superordinal affinities of Rodentia studied by sequence analysis of eye lens protein. In Luckett, W. P., and Hartenberger, J.-L. (eds.),Evolutionary Relationships Among Rodents, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 211–226. Google Scholar
Eisenberg, J. F. (1989).Mammals of the Neotropics. The Northern Neotropics, Vol. 1, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Google Scholar
Ellerman, J. R. (1940).The Families and Genera of Living Rodents, Vol. 1, British Museum (Natural History), London. Google Scholar
Fitch, W. M., and Beintema, J. J. (1990). Correcting parsimonious trees for unseen nucleotide substitutions: The effect of dense branching as exemplified by ribonuclease.Mol. Biol. Evol.7 438–443. Google Scholar
Friday, A. (1987). Models of evolutionary change and the estimation of evolutionary trees. In Harvey, P. H., and Partridge, L. (eds.),Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 4, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 61–88. Google Scholar
Gidley, J. W. (1912). The lagomorphs an independent order.Science36 285–286. Google Scholar
Goodman, M., Romero-Herrera, A. E., Dene, H., Czelusniak, J., and Tashian, R. E. (1982). Amino acid sequence evidence on the phylogeny of primates and other eutherians. In Goodman, M. (ed.),Macromolecular Sequences in Systematic and Evolutionary Biology, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 115–191. Google Scholar
Goodman, M., Czelusniak, J., and Beeber, J. E. (1985). Phylogeny of primates and other eutherian orders: A cladistic analysis using amino acid and nucleotide sequence data.Cladistics1 171–185. Google Scholar
Grassé, P.-P., and Dekeyser, P. L. (1955). Ordre des Rongeurs. In Grassé, P.-P. (ed.),Traité de Zoologie. Anatomie, Systématique, Biologie, Vol. 17(II), Masson et Cie, Paris, pp. 1321–1525. Google Scholar
Graur, D., Hide, W. A., and Li, W.-H. (1991). Is the guinea-pig a rodent?Nature351 649–652. Google Scholar
Graur, D., Hide, W. A., Zharkikh, A., and Li, W.-H. (1992). The biochemical phylogeny of guinea pigs and gundis, and the paraphyly of the order Rodentia.Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B. Comp. Biochem.101 495–498. Google Scholar
Gregory, W. K. (1910). The orders of mammals.Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist.27 1–524. Google Scholar
Hartenberger, J.-L. (1977). A propos de l'origine des Rongeurs.Géobios, Mém. Spéc.1 183–193. Google Scholar
Hartenberger, J.-L. (1980). Données et hypothèses sur la radiation initiale des Rongeurs.Palaeovert. Mém. Jub. R. Lavocat, pp. 258–301.
Hartenberger, J.-L. (1985). The order Rodentia: Major questions on their evolutionary origin, relationships and suprafamilial systematics. In Luckett, W. P., and Hartenberger, J.-L. (eds.),Evolutionary Relationships Among Rodents, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 1–33. Google Scholar
Hasegawa, M., Cao, Y., Adachi, J., and Yano, T.-A. (1992). Rodent polyphyly?Nature355 595. Google Scholar
Hendriks, W., Leunissen, J., Nevo, E., Blemendal, H., and De Jong, W. W. (1987). The lens protein α A-crystallin of the blind mole rat,Spalax ehrenbergi: Evolutionary change and functional constraints.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA84 5320–5324. Google Scholar
Hennig, W. (1950).Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik, Deutscher Zentralverlag, Berlin. Google Scholar
Hennig, W. (1966).Phylogenetic Systematics, University of Illinois Press, Urbana. Google Scholar
Jaeger, J.-J. (1988). Rodent phylogeny: New data and old problems. In Benton, M. J. (ed.),The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods, Vol. 2. Mammals, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 177–199. Google Scholar
Kleinschmidt, T., Nevo, E., Goodman, M., and Braunitzer, G. (1985). Mole rat hemoglobin: Primary structure and evolutionary aspects in a second karyotype of_Spalax ehrenbergi_, Rodentia (2n=52).Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler366 679–685. Google Scholar
Koenigswald, W. von (1985). Evolutionary trends in the enamel of rodent incisors. In Luckett, W. P., and Hartenberger, J.-L. (eds.),Evolutionary Relationships Among Rodents, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 403–422. Google Scholar
Li, C.-K., and Ting, S.-Y. (1985). Possible phylogenetic relationship of Asiatic eurymylids and rodents, with comments on mimotonids. In Luckett, W. P., and Hartenberger, J.-L. (eds.),Evolutionary Relationships Among Rodents, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 35–58. Google Scholar
Li, C.-K., Wilson, R. W., Dawson, M. R., and Krishtalka, L. (1987). The origin of rodents and lagomorphs. In Genoways, H. H. (ed.),Current Mammalogy, Vol. 1, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 97–108. Google Scholar
Li, C.-K., Zheng, J.-J., and Ting, S.-Y. (1989). The skull of_Cocomys lingchaensis_, an early Eocene ctenodactyloid rodent of Asia.Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles Co. Sci. Ser.33 179–192. Google Scholar
Li, W.-H., Hide, W. A., Zharkikh, A., Ma, D.-P., and Graur, D. (1992). The molecular taxonomy and evolution of the guinea pig.J. Hered.83 174–181. Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. (1735).Systema naturae, sive regna tria naturae systematice proposita per classes, ordines, genera et species, Fol. Lugduni, Batavorum. Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. (1758),Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis, Editio decima reformata, Vol. 1, Laurentii Salvii, Stockholm. Google Scholar
Luckett, W. P. (1977). Ontogeny of amniote fetal membranes and their application to phylogeny. In Hecht, M. K., Goody, P. C., and Hecht, B. M. (eds.),Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 439–516. Google Scholar
Luckett, W. P. (1980). The suggested evolutionary relationships and classification of tree shrews. In Luckett, W. P. (ed.),Comparative Biology and Evolutionary Relationships of Tree Shrews, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 3–31. Google Scholar
Luckett, W. P. (1985). Superordinal and intraordinal affinities of rodents: Developmental evidence from the dentition and placentation. In Luckett, W. P., and Hartenberger, J.-L. (eds.),Evolutionary Relationships Among Rodents, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 227–276. Google Scholar
Luckett, W. P. (1993). An ontogenetic assessment of dental homologies in therian mammals. In Szalay, F. S., Novacek, M. J., and McKenna, M. C. (eds.),Mammal Phylogeny, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 182–204. Google Scholar
Luckett, W. P., and Hartenberger, J.-L. (eds.) (1985a).Evolutionary Relationships Among Rodents, Plenum Press, New York. Google Scholar
Luckett, W. P., and Hartenberger, J.-L. (1985b). Evolutionary relationships among rodents: Comments and conclusions. In Luckett, W. P., and Hartenberger, J.-L. (eds.),Evolutionary Relationships Among Rodents, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 685–712. Google Scholar
MacPhee, R. D. E. (1981). Auditory regions of primates and eutherian insectivores.Contrib. Primatol.18 1–282. Google Scholar
Martin, R. D. (1990).Primate Origins and Evolution, Chapman and Hall, London. Google Scholar
McKenna, M. C. (1982). Lagomorph interrelationships.Geobios Mém. Spéc.6 213–223. Google Scholar
Miyamoto, M. M., and Goodman, M. (1986). Biomolecular systematics of eutherian mammals: Phylogenetic patterns and classification.Syst. Zool.35 230–240. Google Scholar
Moeller, H. (1974). Nagezähne bei Eutheria und Metatheria. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis von Konvergenzer-scheinungen bei Säugern.Säug. Mitt.22 112–122. Google Scholar
Mossman, H. W. (1937). Comparative morphogenesis of the fetal membranes and accessory uterine structures.Contrib. Embryol. Carneg. Inst.26 129–246. Google Scholar
Mossman, H. W. (1987).Vertebrate Fetal Membranes, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ. Google Scholar
Novacek, M. J. (1980). Cranioskeletal features in tupaiids and selected Eutheria as phylogenetic evidence. In Luckett, W. P. (ed.),Comparative Biology and Evolutionary Relationships of Tree Shrews, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 35–93. Google Scholar
Novacek, M. J. (1985). Cranial evidence for rodent affinities. In Luckett, W. P., and Hartenberger, J.-L. (eds.),Evolutionary Relationships Among Rodents, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 59–81. Google Scholar
Novacek, M. J. (1990). Morphology, paleontology, and the higher clades of mammals. In Genoways, H. H. (ed.),Current Mammalogy, Vol. 2, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 507–543. Google Scholar
Prothero, D. R., Manning, E. M., and Fischer, M. (1988). The phylogeny of the ungulates. In Benton, M. J. (ed.),The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods, Vol. 2. Mammals, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 201–234. Google Scholar
Ray, J. (1693).Synopsis methodica animalium quadrupedum et serpentini generis, S. Smith and B. Walford, London. Google Scholar
Romero-Herrera, A. E., Lehmann, H., Joysey, K. A., and Friday, A. E. (1978). On the evolution of myoglobin.Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B283 61–163. Google Scholar
Sarich, V. M. (1985). Rodent macromolecular systematics. In Luckett, W. P., and Hartenberger, J.-L. (eds.),Evolutionary Relationships Among Rodents, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 423–452. Google Scholar
Shoshani, J. (1986). Mammalian phylogeny: Comparison of morphological and molecular results.Mol. Biol. Evol.3 222–242. Google Scholar
Shoshani, J., Goodman, M., Czelusniak, J., and Braunitzer, G. (1985). A phylogeny of Rodentia and other eutherian orders: Parsimony analysis utilizing amino acid sequences of alpha and beta hemoglobin chains. In Luckett, W. P., and Hartenberger, J.-L. (eds.),Evolutionary Relationships Among Rodents, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 191–210. Google Scholar
Szalay, F. S. (1977). Phylogenetic relationships and a classification of the eutherian Mammalia. In Hecht, M. K., Goody, P. C., and Hecht, B. M. (eds.),Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 317–374. Google Scholar
Szalay, F. S. (1985). Rodent and lagomorph morphotype adaptations, origins, and relationships: Some postcranial attributes analyzed. In Luckett, W. P., and Hartenberger, J.-L. (eds.),Evolutionary Relationships Among Rodents, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 83–132. Google Scholar
Szalay, F. S., Rosenberger, A. L., and Dagosto, M. (1987). Diagnosis and differentiation of the order Primates.Yrb. Phys. Anthropol.30 75–105. Google Scholar
Tullberg, T. (1899). Ueber das System der Nagetiere: Eine phylogenetische Studie.Nova Acta Reg. Soc. Sci. Upsala Ser. 318 1–514. Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1904).Die Säugetiere, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena. Google Scholar
Wood, A. E. (1957). What, if anything is a rabbit?Evolution11 417–425. Google Scholar
Wood, A. E. (1985). The relationships, origin and dispersal of the hystricognathous rodents. In Luckett, W. P., and Hartenberger, J.-L. (eds.),Evolutionary Relationships Among Rodents, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 475–513. Google Scholar
Woods, C. A. (1982). The history and classification of South American hystricognath rodents: Reflections on the far away and long ago. In Mares, M. A., and Genoways, H. H. (eds.),Mammalian Biology in South America, University of Pittsburgh Pymatuning Lab of Ecology, Linesville, pp. 377–392. Google Scholar
Wriston, J. C., Jr. (1981). Biochemical peculiarities of the guinea pig and some possible examples of convergent evolution.J. Mol. Evol.17 1–9. Google Scholar