A General Approach to Confirmatory Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis | Psychometrika | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

We describe a general procedure by which any number of parameters of the factor analytic model can be held fixed at any values and the remaining free parameters estimated by the maximum likelihood method. The generality of the approach makes it possible to deal with all kinds of solutions: orthogonal, oblique and various mixtures of these. By choosing the fixed parameters appropriately, factors can be defined to have desired properties and make subsequent rotation unnecessary. The goodness of fit of the maximum likelihood solution under the hypothesis represented by the fixed parameters is tested by a large sample _x_2 test based on the likelihood ratio technique. A by-product of the procedure is an estimate of the variance-covariance matrix of the estimated parameters. From this, approximate confidence intervals for the parameters can be obtained. Several examples illustrating the usefulness of the procedure are given.

References

Anderson, T. W. An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis, 1958, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Anderson, T. W., & Rubin, H. Statistical inference in factor analysis. In Neyman, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol. V. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1956, 111–150.Google Scholar

Fletcher, R., & Powell, M. J. D. A rapidly convergent descent method for minimization. Computer Journal, 1963, 2, 163–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holzinger, K. J., & Swineford, F. A study in factor analysis: The stability of a bi-factor solution. University of Chicago: Supplementary Educational Monographs, No. 48, 1939.Google Scholar

Howe, W. G. Some contributions to factor analysis. Report No. ORNL-1919, 1955, Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.Google Scholar

Jöreskog, K. G. UMLFA — A computer program for unrestricted maximum likelihood factor analysis, Revised Edition, Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service, 1967.Google Scholar

Jöreskog, K. G. Some contributions to maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1967, 32, 443–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jöreskog, K. G., & Gruvaeus, G. RMLFA — A computer program for restricted maximum likelihood factor analysis, 1967, Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar

Jöreskog, K. G., & Lawley, D. N. New methods in maximum likelihood factor analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1968, 21, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendall, M. G., & Stuart, A. The advanced theory of statistics, vol. 2, 1961, London: Charles Griffin and Co..Google Scholar

Lawley, D. N. Estimation in factor analysis under various initial assumptions. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1958, 11, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawley, D. N. Some new results in maximum likelihood factor analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 1967, 67, 256–264.Google Scholar

Lawley, D. N., & Maxwell, A. E. Factor analysis as a statistical method, 1963, London: Butterworth.Google Scholar

Lawley, D. N., & Maxwell, A. E. Factor transformation methods. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1964, 17, 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lockhart, R. S. Asymptotic sampling variances for factor analytic models identified by specified zero parameters. Psychometrika, 1967, 32, 265–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Reiersøl, O. On the identifiability of parameters in Thurstone's multiple factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1950, 15, 121–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Thurstone, L. L. Multiple-factor analysis, 1947, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Thurstone, L. L., & Thurstone, T. G.. Factorial studies of intelligence. Psychometric Monographs No. 2, 1941, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Tucker, L. R. An inter-battery method of factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1958, 23, 111–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tucker, L. R., Koopman, R. F., & Linn, R. L. Evaluation of factor analytic research procedures by means of simulated correlation matrices. Psychometrika, 1968, in press.Google Scholar

Vernon, P. E. The structure of human abilities, 1951, London: Methuen.Google Scholar