18S rRNA suggests that Entoprocta are protostomes, unrelated to Ectoprocta (original) (raw)

• Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, Struhl K (1995) Current protocols in molecular biology. Greene, New York
  Google Scholar
• Bej AK, Mahbubani MH, Atlas RM (1991) Amplifications of nucleic acids by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and other methods and their applications. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 26:301–334
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bergström J (1986) Metazoan evolution—a new model. Zool Scr 15:189–200
  Google Scholar
• Bevan IS, Rapley R,Walker MR (1992) Sequencing of PCR-amplified DNA. PCR Methods Appl 1:222–228
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bremer K (1988) The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 2:795–803
  Google Scholar
• Brusca RC, Brusca GJ (1990) Invertebrates. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
  Google Scholar
• Clark AH (1921) A new classification of animals. Bull Inst Oceanogr Monaco 400:1–24
  Google Scholar
• Clark RB (1969) Systematics and phylogeny: Annelida, Echiura, Sipuncula. In: Florkin M, and Scheer BT (eds) Chemical zoology, vol IV: Annelida, Echiura and Sipuncula. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–68
  Google Scholar
• Cori C (1936) Kamptozoa. In: Bronn HG (ed) Klassen and Ordnungen des Tierreichs 4, II. Abt, 4. Buch Akad Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig, pp 1–119
  Google Scholar
• De Rijk P, De Wachter R (1993) DCSE, an interactive tool for sequence alignment and secondary structure research. Comput Appl Biosci 9:735–740
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Donoghue MJ, Olmstead RG, Smith JF, Palmer JD (1992) Phylogenetic relationships of Dipsacales based on RbcL sequences. Ann MO Bot Gard 79:333–345
  Google Scholar
• Eckert KA, Kunkel TA (1991) DNA polymerase fidelity and the polymerase chain reaction. PCR Methods Appl 1:17–24
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Eernisse DJ, Albert IS, Anderson FE (1992) Annelida and Arthropoda are not sister taxa: a phylogenetic analysis of spiralian metazoan morphology. Syst Biol 41:305–330
  Google Scholar
• Emig C (1984) On the origin of the Lophophorata. Z Zool Syst Evolutforsch 22:91–94
  Google Scholar
• Emschermann P (1982) Les Kamptozoaires. Etat actuel de nos connaissances sur leur anatomic, leur développement, leur biologie et leur position phylogénétique. Bull Soc Zool Fr 107:317–344
  Google Scholar
• Emschermann P (1985) Cladus Kamptozoa. In: Siewing R (ed) Lehrbuch der Zoologie. Band 11: Systematik. Gustav Fisher Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 576–586
  Google Scholar
• Emschermann P (1987) A circulating water tank for culturing sessile or hemisessile aquatic organisms in a continuous water current. Arch Hydrobiol 108:425–438
  Google Scholar
• Felsenstein J (1988) Phylogenies from molecular sequences: inference and reliability. Annu Rev Genet 22:521–565
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Field KG, Olsen GJ, Lane DJ, Giovannoni SJ, Ghiselen MT, Raff EC, Pace NR, Raff RA (1988) Molecular phylogeny of the animal kingdom. Science 239:748–753
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ghiselen MT (1988) The origin of molluscs in the light of molecular evidence. In: Harvey PH, Partridge L (eds) Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology, vol 5. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 66–95
  Google Scholar
• Gustus RM, Cloney RA (1972) Ultrastructural similarities between setae of brachiopods and polychaetes. Acta Zool 53:229–233
  Google Scholar
• Gutmann WF (1978) Brachiopods: biomechanical interdependencies governing their origin and phylogeny. Science 100:890–893
  Google Scholar
• Halanych KM, Bacheller JD, Aguinaldo AMA, Liva SM, Hillis DM, Lake JA (1995) Evidence from 18S ribosomal DNA that the lophophorates are protostome animals. Science 267:1641–1643
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hempstead PG, Regular SC, Ball IR (1990) A method for the preparation of high-molecular-weight DNA from marine and freshwater triclads. DNA Cell Biol 9:57
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hillis DM, Bull JJ (1993) An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst Biol 42:182–192
  Google Scholar
• Hyman LH (1951) The invertebrates: Acanthocephala, Aschelminthes and Entoprocta-the pseudocoelomate Bilateria. McGraw-Hill, New York
  Google Scholar
• Hyman LH (1959) The invertebrates: smaller coelomate groups: Chaetognatha, Hemichordata, Pogonophora, Phoronida, Ectoprocta, brachiopoda, Sipunculida. McGraw-Hill, New York
  Google Scholar
• Jägersten G (1972) Evolution of the metazoan life cycle. Academic Press, New York
  Google Scholar
• Jeuniaux C (1982) La chitine dans le règne animal. Bull Soc Zool FR 107:363–386
  CAS Google Scholar
• Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kumar S (1995) PHYLTEST: phylogeny hypothesis testing using the minimum evolution method. Pennsylvania State University, State College
  Google Scholar
• Lorenzen S (1985) Phylogenetic aspects of pseudocoelomate evolution. In: Conway-Morris S, George JD, Gibson R, Platt HM (eds) The origins and relationships of lower invertebrates. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 210–223
  Google Scholar
• Nielsen C (1977) The relationships of Entoprocta, Ectoprocta and Phoronida. Am Zool 17:149–150
  Google Scholar
• Nielsen C (1994) Larval and adult characters in animal phylogeny. Am Zool 34:492–501
  Google Scholar
• Nielsen C (1995) Animal evolution, interrelationships of the living phyla. Oxford University Press, Oxford
  Google Scholar
• Olsen GJ, Woese CR (1993) Ribosomal RNA: a key to phylogeny. FASEB J 7:113–123
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rzhetsky A, Kumar S, Nei M (1995) Four-cluster analysis: a simple method to test phylogenetic hypotheses. Mol Biol Evol 12:163–167
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Siewing R (1976) Probleme und neuere Erkenntnisse in der Gross-Systematik der Wirbellosen. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges Stuttgart 1976:59–83
  Google Scholar
• Siewing R (1980) Das Archicoelomatenkonzept. Zool Jb Syst 103:439–82
  Google Scholar
• Specht A (1988) Chaetae. In: Westheide W, Hermans CO. The ultrastructure of the Polychaeta: Microfauna Marina, vol. 4 pp 45-59
• Swofford DL (1993) Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign
  Google Scholar
• Valentine JW (1973) Coelomate superphyla. Syst Zool 22:97–102
  Google Scholar
• Van de Peer Y, Neefs JM, De Wachter R (1990) Small ribosomal subunit RNA sequences, evolutionary relationships among different life forms, and mitochondrial origins. J Mot Evol 30:463–476
  Google Scholar
• Van de Peer Y, De Wachter R (1993) TRECON: a software package for the construction and drawing of evolutionary trees. Comput Appl Biosci 9:177–182
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Van de Peer Y, Van den Broeck I, De Rijk R, De Wachter R (1994) Database on the structure of small ribosomal subunit RNA. Nucleic Acids Res 22:3488–3494
  PubMed Google Scholar
• van der Auwera G, Chapelle S, De Wachter R (1994) Structure of the large ribosomal subunit RNA of Phytophtora megasperrna, and phylogeny of Oomycetes. FEBS Lett 338:133–136
  PubMed Google Scholar
• von Salvini-Plawen, L (1982) A paedomorphic origin of the oligomerous animals? Zool Scr 11:77–81
  Google Scholar
• Willmer P (1990) Invertebrate relationships. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  Google Scholar
• Wilmotte A, Van de Peer Y, Goris A, Chapelle S, De Baere R, Nelissen B, Neefs JM, Hennebert G, De Wachter R (1993) Evolutionary relationships among higher Fungi inferred from small ribosomal subunit RNA sequence analysis. Syst Appl Microbiol 16:436–444
  CAS Google Scholar
• Winnepenninckx B, Backeljau T, De Wachter R (1993) Extraction of high molecular weight DNA from molluscs. Trends Genet 9:407
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Winnepenninckx B, Backeljau T, De Wachter R (1994) Small ribosomal subunit RNA and the phylogeny of Mollusca. Nautilus Suppl 2:98–110
  Google Scholar
• Winnepenninckx B, Backeljau T, Mackey LY, Brooks JM, De Wachter R, Kumar S, Garey JR (1995) 18S rRNA data indicate that the aschelminthes are polyphyletic in origin and consist of at least three distinct clades. Mol Biol Evol 12:1132–1137
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zimmer RL (1973) Morphological and developmental affinities of the lophophorates. In: Larwood GP (ed) Living and fossil Bryozoa. Academic Press, London, pp 593–599
  Google Scholar