Abrams, S. (1988).A complete handbook of polygraphy. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Google Scholar
Abelson, R., Aronson, E., McGuire, W.J., Newcomb, T.M., Rosenberg, M.J., & Tannenbaum, P.H. (Eds.) (1968).Theories of cognitive consistency: a sourcebook. Chicago: Rand McNally. Google Scholar
American Psychological Association (1981).Ethical principles of psychologists. Washington, DC: Author. Google Scholar
Arther, R.O. (1986). The polygraph’s enemies: An update.Journal of Polygraph Science, 20, 133–136. Google Scholar
Bailey, F.L., Zuckerman, R.E., & Pierce, K.R. (1989).The employee polygraph protection act: A manual for polygraph examiners and employers. Severna Park, MD: American Polygraph Association. Google Scholar
Barland, G.H. (1988). The polygraph test in the USA and elsewhere. In A. Gale (Ed.),The polygraph test: lies, truth and science (pp. 73–95). London: Sage. Google Scholar
Bok, S. (1979).Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. New York: Vintage Books. Google Scholar
Brett, A.S., Phillips, M., & Beary, J.F. (1986). Predictive power of the polygraph: Can the “Lie Detector” really detect liars?The Lancet, 8, 544–547. Article Google Scholar
Caro, R.A. (1989).The years of Lyndon Johnson: Means of ascent. New York: Knopf. Google Scholar
Department of Defense. (1984).The accuracy and utility of polygraph testing. Washington, DC: Author. Google Scholar
DePaulo, B.M., Stone, J.I., & Lassiter, G.D. (1985). Telling ingratiating lies: Effects of target sex and target attractiveness on verbal and nonverbal deceptive success.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1191–1203. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Donchin, E. (1987). Can the mind be read in the brain waves? In Frank Farley and Cynthia H. Hull (Eds.),Using psychological science: Making the public case. Washington, DC: The Federation of Behavioral, Psychological and Cognitive Sciences. Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1985).Telling lies. New York: Norton. Google Scholar
Ford, C.V., King, B.H., Hollender, M.H. (1988). Lies and liars: Psychiatric aspects of prevarication.American Journal of Psychiatry, 145, 554–562. PubMed Google Scholar
Furedy, J.J. (1985). Incredulous vs. critical police use of the polygraph in criminal investigations.Canadian Journal of Criminology, 27, 491–495. Google Scholar
Furedy, J.J. (1987). Evaluating polygraphy from a psychophysiological perspective: A specific-effects analysis.Pavlovian Journal Biological Science, 22, 145–152. Google Scholar
Furedy, J.J. (1989). The North American CQT polygraph and the legal profession: A case of Canadian credulity and a cause for cultural concern.Criminal Law Quarterly, 31, 431–451. Google Scholar
Furedy, J.J. & Heslegrave, R.J. (1988). Validity of the lie detector. A psychophysiological perspective.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 15, 219–245. Article Google Scholar
Furedy, J.J. & Helsegrave, R.J. (1988) (in press). The forensic use of the polygraph: A psychophysiological analysis of current trends and future prospects. In P.K. Ackles, J.R. Jennings, & M.G.H. Coles (Eds.),Advances in Psychophysiology, Volume 4. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. (1973). On telling the truth. In S.C. Feinstein and P.O. Giovacchini (Eds.),Adolescent psychiatry: Developmental and clinical studies, Vol. II. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar
Greene, A.S., & Saxe, L. (1990).Tall tales told to teachers. Unpublished manuscript. Brandeis University.
Greenwald, A. (1975). Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.Psychological Bulletin, 82, 1–20. Article Google Scholar
Hartshorne, H. & May, M.A. (1928).Studies in the nature of character: Book I General methods and results. New York: The Macmillan Company. Google Scholar
Jones, E.E. & Sigall, H. (1971). The bogus pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude.Psychological Bulletin, 76, 349–364. Article Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. (1970).The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Lykken, D.T. (1981).A tremor in the blood: Uses and abuses of the lie detector. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
Lykken, D.T. (1984). Polygraphic interrogation.Nature, 307, 681–684. Article Google Scholar
Lykken, D.T. (1988). The case against polygraph testing. In A. Gale (Ed.),The polygraph test: lies, truth and science (pp. 111–125). London: Sage. Google Scholar
Marston, W.M., (1917). Systolic blood pressure symptoms of deception.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2, 117–163. Article Google Scholar
Marston, W.M., (1935, April). Can you beat the lie detector?Esquire, 40, 174–177. Google Scholar
O’Bannon, R.M., Goldinger, L., & Appleby, G.S. (1989).Honesty and integrity testing: A practical guide. Atlanta, GA: Applied Information Resources. Google Scholar
Orne, M.T. (1975). Implications of laboratory research for the detection of deception. In N. Ansley (Ed.).Legal admissibility of the polygraph, (pp. 94–119). Springfield, IL: C.C. Thomas. Google Scholar
Raskin, D.C. & Podlesny, J.A. (1979). Truth and deception: A reply to Lykken.Psychological Bulletin, 86, 54–59. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Raskin, D.C., (1982). The scientific basis of polygraph techniques and their uses in the judicial process. In A. Tranbell (Ed.),Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials. Stockholm: Norstedt and Somers. Google Scholar
Raskin, D.C. (1986). The polygraph in 1986: Scientific, professional and legal issues surrounding application and acceptance of polygraph evidence.Utah Law Review, 29, 29–74. Google Scholar
Raskin, D.C. (1988). Does science support polygraph testing? In A. Gale (Ed.),The Polygraph test: Lies, truth and science (pp. 96–110). London: Sage. Google Scholar
Rose, R. (1977). Disciplined research and undisciplined problems. In C.H. Weiss (Ed.),Using social research in public policy making (pp. 23–35). Lexington; D.C. Heath and Company. Google Scholar
Sackett, P.R., Burris, L.R., & Callahan, C. (1989). Integrity testing for personnel selection: An Update.Personnel Psychology, 42, 491–529. Article Google Scholar
Saxe, L. (1983). The perspective of social psychology: Toward a viable model for application. In R.F. Kidd and M.J. Saks (Eds.),Advances in applied social psychology, Volume 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Saxe, L. (1985). Liars and lie detection: Umpiring controversy.Transaction/Society, 39–42.
Saxe, L. (1991). Lying: Thoughts of an applied social psychologist.American Psychologist, 46, 409–415. Article Google Scholar
Saxe, L. & Cross, T.P. (1987). Lie detectors. In G. Adelman (Ed.).Encyclopedia of neuroscience. Boston: Birkhauser. Google Scholar
Saxe, L., Dougherty, D., & Cross, T.P. (1985). The validity of polygraph tests: Scientific analysis and public policy.American Psychologist, 40, 355–366. Article Google Scholar
Saxe, L., Schmitz, M., & Zaichkowsky, L. (1987).Polygraph tests as placebos. (Unpublished manuscript).
Shusterman, G. & Saxe, L. (1990).Deception in romantic relationships. (Unpublished manuscript). Brandeis University.
Thomas, L. (1983). The lie detector. In_Late night thoughts on listening to Mahler’s Ninth Symphony_ (pp. 127–132). New York: Viking Press. Google Scholar
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (1983).Scientific validity of polygraph testing (OTA-TM-H-15). Washington, DC: GPO. Google Scholar