Sex, mate selection, and evolution (original) (raw)

References

  1. Andersson, M.B. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton Univ. Press.
    Google Scholar
  2. Andersson, M.B. and Iwasa, Y. 1996. Sexual Selection. Trends in Evolutionary Ecology, 11: 53–58.
    Google Scholar
  3. Atmar, W. 1991. On the role of males. Animal Behavior 41: 195–205.
    Google Scholar
  4. Bell, G. and Maynard Smith, J. 1987. Short-term selection for recombination among mutually antagonistic species. Nature, 328: 66–68.
    Google Scholar
  5. Bremermann, H.J. 1980. Sex and polymorphism as strategies in host-pathogen interactions. J. Theor. Biol., 87: 641–702.
    Google Scholar
  6. Bremermann, H.J. 1985. The adaptive significance of sexuality. Experientia 41: 1245–1253.
    Google Scholar
  7. Buss, D. 1989. Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behav. Brain Sci. 12: 1–49.
    Google Scholar
  8. Davis, C.H. 1995. The effect of assortative mating and environmental variation on selection for sexual reproduction. Evolutionary Theory, 11: 51–53.
    Google Scholar
  9. Eberhard, W.G. 1966. Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic female Choice. Princeton Univ. Press, New Jersey,USA, 501 pp.
    Google Scholar
  10. Ebert, D. and Hamilton, W.D. 1996. Sex against virulence: The coevolution of parasitic diseases. Trends in Evolutionary Ecology, 11: 79–82.
    Google Scholar
  11. Goldberg, D.E. 1989. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley.
    Google Scholar
  12. Grammer, K. 1989. Human courtship behaviour: biological basis and cognitive processing. In: Rasa A.E., Vogel C. and Voland E. (eds). The sociobiology of sexual and reproductive strategies Chapman and Hall, London. Pp. 147–169.
    Google Scholar
  13. Hamilton, W.D. 1980. Sex versus non-sex versus parasites. Oikos, 35: 282–296.
    Google Scholar
  14. Hamilton, W.D., Axelrod, R and Tanese, R. 1990. Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites (A review). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA) 87: 3566–3573.
    Google Scholar
  15. Hill, W.G. and Robertson, A. 1966. The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet. Res. Camb. 8: 269–294.
    Google Scholar
  16. Howard, R.S. and Lively C.M. 1994. Parasitism, mutation accumulation and the maintenance of sex. Nature, 367: 554–556.
    Google Scholar
  17. Hurst, L.D. and Peck, J.R. 1996. Recent advances in the understanding of the evolution and maintenance of sex. Trends in Evolutionary Ecology, 11: 46–52.
    Google Scholar
  18. Jacobs, L.F. 1996. Sexual selection and the brain. Trends in Evolutionary Ecology, 11: 82–86.
    Google Scholar
  19. Jaffe, K. 1995. Biodynamica: A simulation model for biological evolution. File Biodynin.exe in http://hercules.usb.ve/\~kjaffe (requires a MS Windows environment).
    Google Scholar
  20. Jaffe, K. 1996. The dynamics of the evolution of sex: Why the sexes are, in fact, always two? Interciencia, 21: 259–267 and 22: 48.
    Google Scholar
  21. Jaffe, K and Chacon-Puignau, G. 1995. Assortative mating: sex differences in mate selection for married and unmarried couples. Human Biol., 67: 111–120.
    Google Scholar
  22. Jaffe, K., Issa, S., Daniels, E. and Haile, D. 1997. Dynamics of the emergence of genetic resistance to pesticides among asexual and sexual organisms. J. Theor. Biol. 188: 289–299.
    Google Scholar
  23. Judson, O.P. and Normak, B.B. 1996. Ancient asexual scandals. Trends in Evolutionary Ecology, 11: 41–46.
    Google Scholar
  24. Kondrashov, A.S. 1994. The asexual ploidy cycles and the origin of sex. Nature 370: 213–216
    Google Scholar
  25. LeClerc, J.E., Li, B., Payne W.L. and Cebula T.A. 1996. High mutation frequencies among Echerichia coli and Salmonella pathogens. Science 274: 1208–1211.
    Google Scholar
  26. Levin, S.A., Grenfell, B., Hastings, A. and Perlson, A.S. 1997. Mathematical and computational challenges in population biology and ecosystem science. Science, 275: 334–343.
    Google Scholar
  27. Maynard Smith, J. 1978. The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge Univ. Press. U.K.
    Google Scholar
  28. Miller, G.F. and Todd, P.M. 1994. Evolutionary wanderlust: Sexual selection with directional mate preferences. In: D. Cliff, P. Husbands, J.A. Meyer and S. Wilson eds. Proc. Third Inter. Conf. Simulation Adaptive Behav. (SAB-94), M.I.T. Press, Bradford Books, pp 21–30.
    Google Scholar
  29. Muller, H.J. 1932. Some genetic aspects of sex. Amer. Natur. 66: 118–138.
    Google Scholar
  30. Muller, H.J. 1964. The relation of recombination to mutational change. Mutat Res 1:2–9.
    Google Scholar
  31. Nahon, E., Atzmony, D., Zahavi, A. and Granot, D. 1995. Mate selection in Yeast: A reconsideration of the signals and the message encoded by them. J. Theor. Biol., 172: 315–322.
    Google Scholar
  32. Pennisi, E. 1995. Imperfect match, do ideal mates come in symmetrical packages? Science News, 147: 60–61.
    Google Scholar
  33. Ruelle, D., 1991. Chance and Chaos. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 195 pp.
    Google Scholar
  34. Rushton, J.P. 1989. Genetic similarity, human altruism and group selection. Behav. Brain. Sci., 12: 503–559
    Google Scholar
  35. Thiessen, D. and Gregg, B. 1980. Human assortative mating and genetic equilibrium: an evolutionary perspective. Ethol. Sociobiol., 1: 111–140.
    Google Scholar
  36. Voland, E. and Engel, C. 1990. Female choice in humans: a conditional mate selection strategy of the Krummhorn women (Germany, 1720–1874)., Ethol 84: 144–154.
    Google Scholar
  37. Wedekind, C., Seebeck, T., Bettens, F. and Paepke, J. 1995. MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B., 260: 245–249.
    Google Scholar

Download references