The ad Hominem argument as an informal fallacy (original) (raw)
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
- Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
- Cancel anytime View plans
Buy Now
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Instant access to the full article PDF.
References
- Barth, E. M. and E. C. W. Krabbe: 1982, From Axiom to Dialogue, New York, De Gruyter.
Google Scholar - Barth, E. M. and J. L. Martens: 1977, ‘Argumentum Ad Hominem: From Chaos to Formal Dialectic’, Logique et Analyse, 77–78, 76–96.
- Brinton, Alan: 1985, ‘A Rhetorical View of the _Ad Hominem_’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 63, 50–63.
Google Scholar - DeMorgan, A.: 1847, Formal Logic, London, Taylor and Walton.
Google Scholar - Govier, T.: 1983, ‘Ad Hominem: Revising the Textbooks’, Teaching Philosophy 6, 13–24.
Google Scholar - Hamblin, C. L.: 1970, Fallacies, London, Methuen.
Google Scholar - Hinman, Lawrence M.,: 1982, ‘The Case for Ad Hominem Arguments’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 60, 338–345.
Google Scholar - Hughes, G. E.: 1958, ‘Moral Condemnation’, in A. Melden (ed.), Essays in Moral Philosophy, Seattle, University of Washington Press, 108–134.
Google Scholar - Johnstone, H. W., Jr.: 1978, Validity and Rhetoric in Philosophical Argument, University Park, Dialogue Press of Man and World.
Google Scholar - Walton, D.: 1984, Logical Dialogue-Games and Fallacies, Lanham, Maryland, University Press of America.
Google Scholar - Walton, D.: 1985, Arguer's Position, Westport, Ct., Greenwood Press.
Google Scholar - Whately, R.: 1836, Elements of Logic, New York, William Jackson.
Google Scholar - Woods, J. and D. Walton: 1977, ‘_Ad Hominem_’, The Philosophical Forum 8, 1–20.
Google Scholar