Relevance reviewed: The case of argumentum ad hominem (original) (raw)
References
Barth, E.M. and E.C.W. Krabbe: 1978, ‘Formele dialectiek: ter beslechting van conflicten over geuite meningen’, Spektator. Tijdschrift voor Neerlandistiek7, 307–341. Google Scholar
Barth, E.M. and J.L. Martens: 1977, ‘Argumentum and Hominem: From chaos to Formal Dialectic. The Method of Dialogue-Tableaus as a tool in the Theory of Fallacy’, Logique et Analyse, Nouvelle Série20, 76–96. Google Scholar
Copi, I.M.: 1972, Introduction to Logic, 1st impr. 1953, 4th impr. Macmillan/Collier-Macmillan, New York/London. Google Scholar
Crawshay-Williams, R.: 1957, Methods and Criteria of Reasoning. An Inquiry into the Structure of Controversy, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London. Google Scholar
Dascal, M.: 1977, ‘Conversational Relevance’, Journal of Pragmatics1, 309–328. Google Scholar
Eemeren, F.H. van: 1986, ‘Dialectical Analysis as a Normative Reconstruction of Argumentative Discourse’, Text6(1), 1–16. Google Scholar
Eemeren, F.H. van: 1987, ‘For Reason's Sake: Maximal Argumentative Analysis of Discourse’, in F.H. van Eemeren et al. (eds.), Argumentation: Across the Lines of Discipline. Foris, Dordrecht/Providence, 201–216. Google Scholar
Eemeren, F.H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1984, Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed Towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. PDA 1, Foris, Dordrecht/Cinnaminson. Google Scholar
Eemeren, F.H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1987a, ‘Het analyseren en beoordelen van betogende teksten’, Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing9(1), 48–66. Google Scholar
Eemeren, F.H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1987 b, “Fallacies in pragma-dialectical Perspective”, Argumentation1, 283–301. Google Scholar
Eemeren, F.H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1990, “Relevantie in argumentatieve teksten” Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing12(3), 180–189. Google Scholar
Eemeren, F.H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1992, Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies. A Pragma-dialectical Perspective, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J. Google Scholar
Eemeren, F.H. van, R. Grootendorst and T. Kruiger: 1986, Drogredenen. Argumentatileer 2, Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen. Google Scholar
Govier, T.: 1988, A Practical Study of Argument, 1st impr. 1985, 2nd impr., Wadsworth, Belmont, Cal. Google Scholar
Grice, P.: 1989, Studies in the Way of Words, Harvard Priversity Press, Cambridge, Mass. Google Scholar
Haft-van Rees, M.A.: 1985, ‘Relevantie van uitingen in argumentatieve teksten’, in W.K.B. Koning (ed.), Taalbeheersing in theorie en praktijk, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 46–54. Google Scholar
Hamblin, C.L.: 1970, Fallacies, Methuen, London. Google Scholar
Iseminger, G.: 1986, ‘Relatedness Logic and Entailment’, Journal of Non-Classical Logic3(1), 5–23. Google Scholar
Jacobs, S. and S. Jackson: 1983, ‘Speech Acts Structure in Conversation: Rational Aspects of Pragmatic Coherence’, in R.T. Craig and K. Tracy (eds.), Conversational Coherence: Form, Structure and Strategy, Sage, Beverly Hills, pp. 47–66. Google Scholar
Johnson, R.H. and J.A. Blair: 1983, Logical Self-defense, 1st impr. 1977, 2nd impr., McGraw-Hill Ryerson, Toronto. Google Scholar
Rescher, N.: 1964, Introduction to Logic, St Martin's Press, New York. Google Scholar
Sanders, R.E.: 1980, ‘Principles of Relevance: A Theory of the Relationship Between Language and Communication’, Communication and Cognition13(1), 77–95. Google Scholar
Schlesinger, G.N.: 1986, ‘Relevance’, Cheoria52, 57–67. Google Scholar
Scriven, M.: 1976, Reasoning, McGraw-Hill, New York. Google Scholar
Sperber, D. and D. Wilson: 1986, Relevance Communication and Cognition, Blackwell, Oxford. Google Scholar
Tracy, K.: 1982, ‘On Getting the Point: Distinguishing “Issues” from “Events”, an Aspect of Conversational Coherence’, Communication Yearbook5, 279–301. Google Scholar
Walton, D.N.: 1982, Topical Relevance in Argumentation, John Benjamins, Amsterdam. Google Scholar
Werth, P.: 1981, ‘The Concept of “Relevance” in Conversational Analysis’, in P. Werth (ed.), Conversational and Discourse, Croom Helm, London, pp. 129–155. Google Scholar
Wilson, D. and D. Sperber: 1981, ‘On Grice's Theory of Conversation’, in P. Werth (ed.), Conversation and Discourse, Croom Helm, London, pp. 155–179. Google Scholar
Woods, J. and D. Walton: 1989, Fallacies: Selected Papers 1972–1987, Foris, Dordrecht. Google Scholar