Analysis of cutaneous warm and cold fibres in primates (original) (raw)

Summary

Cutaneous warm and cold receptors were examined electrophysiologically in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) by recording from single units dissected from the saphenous nerve and the superficial branch of the radial nerve. Single warm and cold fibres had spot-like receptive fields in the hairy skin which were highly specific to thermal stimuli and did not respond to mechanical deformation of the skin. One group of cutaneous warm receptors had a range of static activity between 30 and 44°C and an average static maximum of 12 imp/sec at 41°C, whereas the static maximum of the other group was at temperatures higher than 44°C. About one third of the cold fibres was myelinated, with a conduction velocity from 2.2 to 9.5 m/sec (mean 6.3 m/sec), while the remaining part was unmyelinated, having a conduction velocity of 0.3 to 1.3 m/sec (mean 0.7 m/sec). All warm fibres were non-myelinated, with a conduction velocity of 0.4 to 0.9 m/sec (mean 0.7 m/sec).

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. A. Iggo
    Present address: Department of Physiology, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Physiology, University of Marburg, Lahn
    H. Hensel & A. Iggo

Authors

  1. H. Hensel
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. A. Iggo
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This investigation was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hensel, H., Iggo, A. Analysis of cutaneous warm and cold fibres in primates.Pflugers Arch. 329, 1–8 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00586896

Download citation

Key words