On the Identifiability of Parameters in Thurstone's Multiple Factor Analysis | Psychometrika | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

In econometric literature a parameter in a theoretical model has been called identifiable if it can be uniquely determined in terms of the joint probability distribution of the observed variables. In this paper the identifiability of parameters in four different factor analysis models is considered. The last of these four models corresponds to Thurstone's factor analysis. In Sections 7 and 11, the possibility of a statistical testing of the models is discussed. Section 10 deals with the problem of actually determining the parameter r (the number of common factors) in terms of the probability distribution of the observed variables.

References

Haavelmo, T. The probability approach in econometrics. Supplement to Econometrica, 1944, 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurwicz, L. Generalization of the concept of identification. Cowles Commission Monograph No. 10. Statistical inference in dynamic economic models, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1949.Google Scholar

Kelley, T. L. Crossroads in the mind of man, Calif.: Stanford Univ. Press, 1928.Google Scholar

Koopmans, T. C., Rubin, H., and Leipnik, R. B. Measuring the equation systems of dynamic economics. Cowles Commission Monograph No. 10, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1949.Google Scholar

Koopmans, T. C., and Reiersøl, O.The identification of structural characteristics. To be published.Google Scholar

Ledermann, W. On the rank of the reduced correlational matrix in multiple factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1937, 2, 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reiersøl, O. Confluence analysis by means of lag moments and other methods of confluence analysis. Econometrica, 1941, 9, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomson, G. H. The proof or disproof of the existence of general ability. Brit. J. Psychol., 1919, 9, 323–336.Google Scholar

Thurstone, L. L. The vectors of mind, Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1935.Google Scholar

Thurstone, L. L. Multiple-factor analysis, Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1947.Google Scholar

Wilson, E. B., and Worcester, J. The resolution of tests into two general factors. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci., Wash., 1938, 25, 20–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, E. B., and Worcester, J. The resolution of six tests into three general factors. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci., Wash., 1939, 25, 73–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed