How much is a quantum controller controlled by the controlled system? (original) (raw)
References
Omnès, R.: The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton Series in Physics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1994) Google Scholar
Jauch, J.: Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1968) MATH Google Scholar
Fuchs, C.: Information Gain vs. State Disturbance in Quantum Theory. arXiv:quant-ph/9611010 (1996)
Nielsen, M., Chuang, I.: Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000) MATH Google Scholar
Lloyd, S.: Quantum Controllers for Quantum Systems. arXiv:quant-ph/9703042
Khaneja, N., Glaser, S., Brockett, R.: Sub-Riemannian geometry and time optimal control of three spin systems: Quantum gates and coherence transfer. Phys. Rev. A 71, 039906 (2005) ArticleMathSciNet Google Scholar
Janzing, D., Armknecht, F., Zeier, R., Beth, T.: Quantum control without access to the controlling interaction. Phys. Rev. A 65, 022104 (2002) Article Google Scholar
Lloyd, S., Landahl, A., Slotine, E.: Universal quantum interfaces. Phys. Rev. A 69, 0512305 (2004) ArticleMathSciNet Google Scholar
Hepp, K.: Quantum theory of measurement and macroscopic observables. Helv. Phys. Acta 49, 237–248 (1972) Google Scholar
Cleve, R., Ekert, A., Macchiavello, C., Mosca, M.: Quantum algorithms revisited. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 454, 339–354 (1998) ArticleMathSciNetMATH Google Scholar
Wocjan, P., Zhang, S.: Several natural BQP-complete problems. arXiv:quant-ph/0606179
Janzing, D., Steudel, B.: Quantum broadcasting problem in classical low power signal processing. Phys. Rev. A 75, 022309 (2007) Article Google Scholar
Janzing, D., Beth, T.: Synchronizing quantum clocks with classical one-way communication: Bounds on the generated entropy. arXiv:quant-ph/0306023v1
Janzing, D., Beth, T.: Are there quantum bounds on the recyclability of clock signals in low power computers? In: Proceedings of the DFG-Kolloquium VIVA, Chemnitz arXiv:quant-ph/0202059 (2002)
Janzing, D., Beth, T.: Quasi-order of clocks and their synchronism and quantum bounds for copying timing information. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theor. 49(1), 230–240 (2003) ArticleMathSciNetMATH Google Scholar
Bartlett, S.D., Rudolph, T., Spekkens, R.W., Turner, P.S.: Degradation of a quantum reference frame. New J. Phys. 8, 58 (2006) Article Google Scholar
Poulin, D., Yard, J.: Dynamics of a quantum reference frame. New J. Phys. 9, 156 (2007) Article Google Scholar
Cortese, J.: Holevo–Schumacher–Westmoreland channel capacity for a class of qudit unital channels. Phys. Rev. A 69, 022302 (2004) Article Google Scholar
Holevo, A.: The capacity of quantum channel with general signal states. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theor. 44, 269–273 (1998) ArticleMathSciNetMATH Google Scholar
Schumacher, B., Westmooreland, M.: Sending classical information via a noisy quantum channel. Phys. Rev. A 56, 131–138 (1997) Article Google Scholar
Bennett, C., Harrow, A., Leung, D., Smolin, J.: On the capacities of bipartite Hamiltonians and unitary gates. arXiv:quant-ph/0205057v4
Harrow, A., Shor, P.: Time reversal and exchange symmetries of unitary gate capacities. arXiv:quant-ph/0511219
Linden, N., Smolin, J., Winter, A.: The entangling and disentangling power of unitary transformations are unequal. arXiv:quant-ph/0511217
Chefles, A.: Entangling capacity and distinguishability of two-qubit unitary operators. Phys. Rev. A 72, 042332 (2005) Article Google Scholar
Wang, X., Zanardi, P.: Quantum entanglement of unitary operators on bi-partite systems. Phys. Rev. A 66, 044303 (2002) Article Google Scholar
Faoro, L., Zanardi, P., Zalka, C.: On the entangling power of quantum evolutions. arXiv:quant-ph/0005031
Cirac, I., Dür, W., Kraus, B., Lewenstein, M.: Entangling operations and their implementation using a small amount of entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 544 (2001) Article Google Scholar
Dür, W., Vidal, G., Cirac, I., Linden, N., Popescu, S.: Entanglement capabilities of non-local Hamiltonians. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 137901 (2001) Article Google Scholar
Kraus, B., Cirac, I.: Optimal creation of entanglement using a two-qubit gate. arXiv:0011050
Leifer, M., Henderson, L., Linden, N.: Optimal entanglement generation from quantum operations. Phys. Rev. A 67, 012306 (2003) Article Google Scholar
Berry, D., Sanders, B.: Relation between classical communication capacity and entanglement capability for two-qubit unitary operations. Phys. Rev. A 68, 032312 (2003) ArticleMathSciNet Google Scholar
Murphy, G.: C*-Algebras and Operator Theory. Academic Press, Boston (1990) Google Scholar
Khaneja, N., Brockett, R., Glaser, S.: Time optimal control in spin systems. Phys. Rev. A 63(3), 032308 (2001) Article Google Scholar
Guilini, D., Joos, E., Kiefer, C., Kupsch, J., Stamatescu, I.-O., Zeh, H.D.: Decoherence and theAppearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory. Springer, Berlin (1996) Google Scholar
Janzing, D., Beth, T.: Fragility of a class of highly entangled states with n qubits. Phys. Rev. A 61, 052308 (2000) Article Google Scholar
Clausen, M., Baum, U.: Fast Fourier transforms. Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim (1993)
Serre, J.-P.: Linear representations of finite groups, volume 42 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, Berlin (1977)
McKay, J.: The largest degree of irreducible characters of the symmetric group. Math. Comput. 30(135), 624–631 (1976) ArticleMathSciNetMATH Google Scholar
Andrews, G.: The Theory of Partitions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1984) MATH Google Scholar