Spatial landslide susceptibility modelling using metaheuristic-based machine learning algorithms (original) (raw)

• Malamud BD, Turcotte DL (2006) An inverse cascade explanation for the power-law frequency-area statistics of earthquakes, landslides and wildfires. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 261(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2006.261.01.01
  Article Google Scholar
• Gill JC, Malamud BD (2016) Hazard interactions and interaction networks (cascades) within multi-hazard methodologies. Earth Syst Dyn 7(3):659–679. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-659-2016
  Article Google Scholar
• Crozier MJ (1986) Landslides: causes, consequences and environment. Croom Helm, London
  Google Scholar
• Hilker N, Badoux A, Hegg C (2009) The Swiss flood and landslide damage database 1972–2007. Nat Hazards Earth Syst 9(3):913–925. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-913-2009
  Article Google Scholar
• Petley D (2012) Global patterns of loss of life from landslides. Geology 40(10):927–930. https://doi.org/10.1130/G33217.1
  Article Google Scholar
• Klose M, Damm B, Terhorst B (2015) Landslide cost modeling for transportation infrastructures: a methodological approach. Landslides 12(2):321–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0481-1
  Article Google Scholar
• Pradhan B (2010) Landslide susceptibility mapping of a catchment area using frequency ratio, fuzzy logic and multivariate logistic regression approaches. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 38(2):301–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-010-0020-z
  Article Google Scholar
• Soldato MD, Bianchini S, Calcaterra D, Vita PD, Martire DD, Tomás R, Casagli N (2017) A new approach for landslide-induced damage assessment. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk 8(2):1524–1537. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2017.1347896
  Article Google Scholar
• Ladds M, Keating A, Handmer J, Magee L (2017) How much do disasters cost? A comparison of disaster cost estimates in Australia. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 21:419–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.01.004
  Article Google Scholar
• Daniell JE, Wenzel F, Schaefer AM (2018) The use of historic loss data for insurance and total loss modeling. In: Michel G (ed) Risk modeling for hazards and disasters. Elsevier, New York, pp 107–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804071-3.00005-7
  Chapter Google Scholar
• Corominas J, van Westen C, Frattini P, Cascini L, Malet JP, Fotopoulou S, Catani F, Van Den Eeckhaut M, Mavrouli O, Agliardi F, Pitilakis K, Winter MG, Pastor M, Ferlisi S, Tofani V, Hervás J, Smith JT (2014) Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73(2):209–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0538-8
  Article Google Scholar
• Regmi AD, Devkota KC, Yoshida K, Pradhan B, Pourghasemi HR, Kumamoto T, Akgun A (2014) Application of frequency ratio, statistical index, and weights-of-evidence models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping in Central Nepal Himalaya. Arab J Geosci 7(2):725–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0807-z
  Article Google Scholar
• Chen W, Chai H, Sun X, Wang Q, Ding X, Hong H (2016) A GIS-based comparative study of frequency ratio, statistical index and weights-of-evidence models in landslide susceptibility mapping. Arab J Geosci 9(3):204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2150-7
  Article Google Scholar
• Huqqani IA, Tay LT, Mohamad-Saleh J (2019) Analysis of landslide hazard mapping of Penang island Malaysia using bivariate statistical methods. J Electr Eng Comput Sci 16(2):781–786. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v16.i2.pp781-786
  Article Google Scholar
• Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Cardinali M, Galli M, Ardizzone F (2005) Probabilistic landslide hazard assessment at the basin scale. Geomorphology 72(1–4):272–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.06.002
  Article Google Scholar
• Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Ardizzone F, Cardinali M, Galli M (2006) Estimating the quality of landslide susceptibility models. Geomorphology 81(1–2):166–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.04.007
  Article Google Scholar
• Lombardo L, Mai PM (2018) Presenting logistic regression-based landslide susceptibility results. Eng Geol 244:14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.07.019
  Article Google Scholar
• Sun X, Chen J, Bao Y, Han X, Zhan J, Peng W (2018) Landslide susceptibility mapping using logistic regression analysis along the Jinsha River and its tributaries close to Derong and Deqin County, Southwestern China. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 7(11):438. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7110438
  Article Google Scholar
• Guo H, Zhuang X, Chen P, Alajlan N, Rabczuk T (2022) Analysis of three-dimensional potential problems in non-homogeneous media with physics-informed deep collocation method using material transfer learning and sensitivity analysis. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-022-01633-6
  Article Google Scholar
• Guo H, Zhuang X, Chen P, Alajlan N, Rabczuk T (2022) Stochastic deep collocation method based on neural architecture search and transfer learning for heterogeneous porous media. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01586-2
  Article Google Scholar
• Guo H, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T (2019) A deep collocation method for the bending analysis of Kirchhoff plate. Comput Mater Contin 59(2):433–456. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2019.06660
  Article Google Scholar
• Samaniego E, Anitescu C, Goswami S, Nguyen-Thanh VM, Guo H, Hamdia K, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T (2020) An energy approach to the solution of partial differential equations in computational mechanics via machine learning: Concepts, implementation and applications. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 362:112790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.112790
  Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
• Zhuang X, Guo H, Alajlan N, Zhu H, Rabczuk T (2021) Deep autoencoder based energy method for the bending, vibration, and buckling analysis of Kirchhoff plates with transfer learning. Eur J Mech-A Solids 87:104225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2021.104225
  Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
• Anitescu C, Atroshchenko E, Alajlan N, Rabczuk T (2019) Artificial neural network methods for the solution of second order boundary value problems. Comput Mater Contin 59(1):345–359. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2019.06641
  Article Google Scholar
• Alkhasawneh MS, Ngah UK, Tay LT, Mat-Isa NA, Al-Batah MS (2014) Modeling and testing landslide hazard using decision tree. J Appl Math 2014:929768. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/929768
  Article Google Scholar
• Gorsevski PV, Brown MK, Panter K, Onasch CM, Simic A, Snyder J (2016) Landslide detection and susceptibility mapping using LiDAR and an artificial neural network approach: a case study in the Cuyahoga Valley National Park, Ohio. Landslides 13(3):467–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0587-0
  Article Google Scholar
• Lee S, Hong SM, Jung HS (2017) A support vector machine for landslide susceptibility mapping in Gangwon Province, Korea. Sustainability 9(1):48. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010048
  Article Google Scholar
• Chen W, Pourghasemi HR, Naghibi SA (2018) Prioritization of landslide conditioning factors and its spatial modeling in Shangnan County, China using GIS-based data mining algorithms. Bull Eng Geol Environ 77(2):611–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1004-9
  Article Google Scholar
• Polykretis C, Chalkias C, Ferentinou M (2019) Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) modeling for landslide susceptibility assessment in a Mediterranean hilly area. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78(2):1173–1187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1125-1
  Article Google Scholar
• Huqqani IA, Tay LT, Mohamad-Saleh J (2021) Landslide hazard analysis using a multilayered approach based on various input data configurations. Geosfera Indones 6(1):20–39. https://doi.org/10.19184/geosi.v6i1.23347
  Article Google Scholar
• Chen W, Panahi M, Pourghasemi HR (2017) Performance evaluation of GIS-based new ensemble data mining techniques of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) with genetic algorithm (GA), differential evolution (DE), and particle swarm optimization (PSO) for landslide spatial modelling. Catena 157:310–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.05.034
  Article Google Scholar
• Tien Bui D, Shahabi H, Shirzadi A, Chapi K, Hoang ND, Pham BT, Bui QT, Tran CT, Panahi M, Bin Ahmad B, Lee S (2018) A novel integrated approach of relevance vector machine optimized by imperialist competitive algorithm for spatial modeling of shallow landslides. Remote Sens 10(10):1538. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10101538
  Article Google Scholar
• Moayedi H, Mehrabi M, Mosallanezhad M, Rashid ASA, Pradhan B (2019) Modification of landslide susceptibility mapping using optimized PSO-ANN technique. Eng Comput 35(3):967–984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0644-0
  Article Google Scholar
• Chen W, Chen X, Peng J, Panahi M, Lee S (2021) Landslide susceptibility modeling based on ANFIS with teaching-learning-based optimization and Satin bowerbird optimizer. Geosci Front 12(1):93–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.07.012
  Article Google Scholar
• Hong H, Tsangaratos P, Ilia I, Loupasakis C, Wang Y (2020) Introducing a novel multi-layer perceptron network based on stochastic gradient descent optimized by a meta-heuristic algorithm for landslide susceptibility mapping. Sci Total Environ 742:140549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140549
  Article Google Scholar
• Karaboga D, Akay B (2009) A comparative study of Artificial Bee Colony algorithm. Appl Math Comput 214(1):108–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2009.03.090
  Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
• Onwunalu JE, Durlofsky LJ (2010) Application of a particle swarm optimization algorithm for determining optimum well location and type. Comput Geosci 14(1):183–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-009-9142-1
  Article MATH Google Scholar
• He Q, Hu X, Ren H, Zhang H (2015) A novel artificial fish swarm algorithm for solving large-scale reliability-redundancy application problem. ISA Trans 59:105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2015.09.015
  Article Google Scholar
• Amin N, Marowan AQ, Ghosh BC (2015) Application of genetic algorithm in power system optimization with multi-type FACTS. Int J Sci Res Publ 7(5):748-754. http://www.ijsrp.org/research-paper-0517.php?rp=P656445
• Padhy S, Panda S (2021) Application of a simplified grey wolf optimization technique for adaptive fuzzy PID controller design for frequency regulation of a distributed power generation system. Prot Control Mod Power Syst 6(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41601-021-00180-4
  Article Google Scholar
• Moayedi H, Mehrabi M, Kalantar B, Mu’azu MA, Rashid ASA, Foong LK, Nguyen H (2019) Novel hybrids of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) with several metaheuristic algorithms for spatial susceptibility assessment of seismic-induced landslide. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk 10(1):1879–1911. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2019.1650126
  Article Google Scholar
• Nguyen VV, Pham BT, Vu BT, Prakash I, Jha S, Shahabi H, Shirzadi A, Ba DN, Kumar R, Chatterjee JM, Tien Bui D (2019) Hybrid machine learning approaches for landslide susceptibility modeling. Forests 10(2):157. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10020157
  Article Google Scholar
• Chen W, Hong H, Panahi M, Shahabi H, Wang Y, Shirzadi A, Pirasteh S, Alesheikh AA, Khosravi K, Panahi S, Rezaie F, Li S, Jaafari A, Bui DT, Bin Ahmad B (2019) Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using GIS-based data mining techniques of ANFIS with whale optimization algorithm (WOA) and grey wolf optimizer (GWO). Appl Sci 9(18):3755. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9183755
  Article Google Scholar
• Jaafari A, Panahi M, Pham BT, Shahabi H, Bui DT, Rezaie F, Lee S (2019) Meta optimization of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system with grey wolf optimizer and biogeography-based optimization algorithms for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility. Catena 175:430–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.033
  Article Google Scholar
• Tien Bui D, Nguyen QP, Hoang ND, Klempe H (2017) A novel fuzzy K-nearest neighbor inference model with differential evolution for spatial prediction of rainfall-induced shallow landslides in a tropical hilly area using GIS. Landslides 14:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-016-0708-4
  Article Google Scholar
• Varnes DJ (1978) Slope movement types and processes. In: Special report 176: National Academy of Science, Washington DC, pp 11–33. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/sr/sr176/176-002.pdf
• Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 31(1–4):181–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(99)00078-1
  Article Google Scholar
• He Q, Shahabi H, Shirzadi A, Li S, Chen W, Wang N, Chai H, Bian H, Ma J, Chen Y, Wang X, Chapi K, Ahmad BB (2019) Landslide spatial modelling using novel bivariate statistical based Naïve Bayes, RBF Classifier, and RBF Network machine learning algorithms. Sci Total Environ 663:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.329
  Article Google Scholar
• Ali S, Biermanns P, Haider R, Reicherter K (2019) Landslide susceptibility mapping by using a geographic information system (GIS) along the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (Karakoram Highway), Pakistan. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 19(5):999–1022. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-999-2019
  Article Google Scholar
• Arabameri A, Pradhan B, Rezaei K, Lee CW (2019) Assessment of landslide susceptibility using statistical- and artificial intelligence-based FR-RF integrated model and multiresolution DEMs. Remote Sens 11(9):999. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11090999
  Article Google Scholar
• van Westen CJ, Rengers N, Soeters R (2003) Use of geomorphological information in indirect landslide susceptibility assessment. Nat Hazards 30(3):399–419. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000007097.42735.9e
  Article Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Gupta V, Sundriyal YP (2019) Spatial interrelationship of landslides, litho-tectonics, and climate regime, Satluj valley, Northwest Himalaya. Geol J 54(1):537–551. https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.3204
  Article Google Scholar
• Wang X, Huang Z, Hong MM, Zhao YF, Ou YS, Zhang J (2019) A comparison of the effects of natural vegetation regrowth with a plantation scheme on soil structure in a geological hazard-prone region. Eur J Soil Sci 70(3):674–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12781
  Article Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Cai H, Shao W, Huang D, Uchimura T, Lei X, Tian H, Qiao J (2019) Clarifying the hydrological mechanisms and thresholds for rainfall-induced landslide: in situ monitoring of big data to unsaturated slope stability analysis. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78(4):2139–2150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1295-5
  Article Google Scholar
• Chen FW, Liu CW (2012) Estimation of the spatial rainfall distribution using inverse distance weighting (IDW) in the middle of Taiwan. Paddy Water Environ 10(3):209–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-012-0319-1
  Article Google Scholar
• Hu X, Zhang H, Mei H, Xiao D, Li Y, Li M (2020) Landslide susceptibility mapping using the stacking ensemble machine learning method in Lushui, Southwest China. Appl Sci 10:4016. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10114016
  Article Google Scholar
• Dou J, Yunus AP, Bui DT, Merghadi A, Sahana M, Zhu Z, Chen CW, Han Z, Pham BT (2020) Improved landslide assessment using support vector machine with bagging, boosting, and stacking ensemble machine learning framework in a mountainous watershed, Japan. Landslides 17:641–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01286-5
  Article Google Scholar
• Choi J, Oh HJ, Lee HJ, Lee C, Lee S (2012) Combining landslide susceptibility maps obtained from frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models using ASTER images and GIS. Eng Geol 124:12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.09.011
  Article Google Scholar
• Shalabi LA, Zyad S, Kasasbeh B (2006) Data mining: a preprocessing engine. J Comput Sci 2(9):735–739. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2006.735.739
  Article Google Scholar
• Riba Ruiz J, Canals T, Cantero Gomez R (2012) Comparative study of multivariate methods to identify paper finishes using infrared spectroscopy. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 61(4):1029–1036. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2011.2173048
  Article Google Scholar
• Jolliffe IT, Cadima J (2016) Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 374(2065):20150202. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202
  Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
• McCulloch WS, Pitts W (1943) A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull Math Biophys 5(4):115–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02478259
  Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
• Karaboga D (2005) An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization. Tech Rep TR06, Erciyes Univ, p 10. http://abc.erciyes.edu.tr/pub/tr06_2005.pdf
• Karaboga N (2009) A new design method based on artificial bee colony algorithm for digital IIR filters. J Franklin Inst 346(4):328–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2008.11.003
  Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
• Bahamish H, Abdullah R, Abdul Salam R (2009) Protein tertiary structure prediction using artificial bee colony algorithm. In: \(3^{rd}\) Asia international conference on modelling and simulation, pp 258–263. https://doi.org/10.1109/AMS.2009.47
• Karaboga D, Akay B, Ozturk C (2007) Artificial bee colony (ABC) optimization algorithm for training feed-forward neural networks. In: Torra V, Narukawa Y, Yoshida Y (eds) Modeling decisions for artificial intelligence. Springer, Berlin, pp 318–329
  Chapter Google Scholar
• Javed A, Larijani H, Ahmadinia A, Emmanuel R (2017) Random neural network learning heuristics. Probab Eng Inf Sci 31(4):436–456. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269964817000201
  Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
• Xiaolei L, Zhijiang S, Jixin Q (2002) An optimizing method based on autonomous animats: Fish-swarm algorithm. Syst Eng Theory Pract 22(11):32–38. http://www.sysengi.com/CN/Y2002/V22/I11/32
• Lei X, Ouyang H, Xu L (2018) Image segmentation based on equivalent three-dimensional entropy method and artificial fish swarm optimization algorithm. Opt Eng 57(10):103106. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.57.10.103106
  Article Google Scholar
• Tsai HC, Lin YH (2011) Modification of the fish swarm algorithm with particle swarm optimization formulation and communication behavior. Appl Soft Comput 11(8):5367–5374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2011.05.022
  Article Google Scholar
• Li H, Huang Y, Tian S (2019) Risk probability predictions for coal enterprise infrastructure projects in countries along the Belt and Road Initiative. Int J Ind Ergon 69:110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2018.10.006
  Article Google Scholar
• Chung CJF, Fabbri A (1999) Probabilistic prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 65(12):1389-1399. https://www.asprs.org/wp-content/uploads/pers/1999journal/dec/1999_dec_1389-1399.pdf
• Pourtaghi ZS, Pourghasemi HR (2014) GIS-based groundwater spring potential assessment and mapping in the Birjand Township, southern Khorasan Province, Iran. Hydrogeol J 22(3):643–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-013-1089-6
  Article Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Prakash I (2019) Evaluation and comparison of LogitBoost Ensemble, Fisher’s Linear Discriminant Analysis, logistic regression and support vector machines methods for landslide susceptibility mapping. Geocarto Int 34(3):316–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2017.1404141
  Article Google Scholar
• Jaafari A (2018) LiDAR-supported prediction of slope failures using an integrated ensemble weights-of-evidence and analytical hierarchy process. Environ Earth Sci 77:42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-7207-3
  Article Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Jaafari A, Prakash I, Bui DT (2019) A novel hybrid intelligent model of support vector machines and the MultiBoost ensemble for landslide susceptibility modeling. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78:2865–2886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1281-y
  Article Google Scholar
• Tien Bui D, Tuan TA, Klempe H, Pradhan B, Revhaug I (2016) Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: a comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vector machines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree. Landslides 12:361–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0557-6
  Article Google Scholar
• Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S, Buchmann C, Carl G, Carré G, Marquéz JRG, Gruber B, Lafourcade B, Leitão PJ, Münkemüller T, McClean C, Osborne PE, Reineking B, Schröder B, Skidmore AK, Zurell D, Lautenbach S (2013) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36:27–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x
  Article Google Scholar
• Ahlgren P, Jarneving B, Rousseau R (2003) Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson’s correlation coefficient. J Am Soc Inf Sci 54:550–560. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10242
  Article Google Scholar
• Liao D, Valliant R (2012) Variance inflation factors in the analysis of complex survey data. Surv Methodol 38:53–62
  Google Scholar
• Belsley DA (1991) A Guide to using the collinearity diagnostics. Comput Sci Econ Manage 4:33–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00426854
  Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
• Schuerman J (1983) Principal components analysis. Multivariate analysis in the human services. Springer, Netherlands, pp 93–119
  Google Scholar
• Allison PD (1999) Logistic regression using the SAS system: theory and application. SAS Institute Inc, USA
  Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2013) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, New York
  Google Scholar
• Hu X, Huang C, Mei H, Zhang H (2021) Landslide susceptibility mapping using an ensemble model of Bagging scheme and random subspace-based naïve Bayes tree in Zigui County of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China. Bull Eng Geol Environ 80:5315–5329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02275-6
  Article Google Scholar
• Székely GJ, Rizzo ML, Bakirov NK (2007) Measuring and testing dependence by correlation of distances. Ann Stat 35(6):2769–2794. https://doi.org/10.1214/009053607000000505
  Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
• Székely GJ, Rizzo ML (2009) Brownian distance covariance. Ann Appl Stat 3(4):1236–1265. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-AOAS312
  Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
• Székely GJ, Rizzo ML (2012) On the uniqueness of distance covariance. Stat Probab Lett 82(12):2278–2282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2012.08.007
  Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
• Sejdinovic D, Sriperumbudur B, Gretton A, Fukumizu K (2013) Equivalence of distance-based and RKHS-based statistics in hypothesis testing. Ann Stat 41(5):2263–2291. https://doi.org/10.1214/13-AOS1140
  Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
• Gromenko O, Kokoszka P, Zhu L, Sojka J (2012) Estimation and testing for spatially indexed curves with application to ionospheric and magnetic field trends. Ann Appl Stat 6(2):669–696. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41713469
• Dueck J, Edelmann D, Gneiting t, Richards D (2014) The affinely invariant distance correlation. Bernoulli 20(4):2305–2330. https://doi.org/10.3150/13-BEJ558
  Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
• Racherla PN, Shindell DT, Faluvegi GS (2012) The added value to global model projections of climate change by dynamical downscaling: a case study over the continental US using the GISS-ModelE2 and WRF models. J Geophys Res Atmos 117:D20. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018091
  Article Google Scholar
• Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C (2002) Assessment of landslide susceptibility for a landslide-prone area (north of Yenice, NW Turkey) by fuzzy approach. Environ Geol 41(6):720–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-001-0454-2
  Article Google Scholar
• Egan JP (1975) Signal detection theory and ROC-analysis. Academic Press, New York
  Google Scholar
• Pradhan B, Lee S (2010) Delineation of landslide hazard areas on Penang Island, Malaysia, by using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models. Environ Earth Sci 60(5):1037–1054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0245-8
  Article Google Scholar