Qualification of the analytical and clinical performance of CSF biomarker analyses in ADNI (original) (raw)

Abstract

The close correlation between abnormally low pre-mortem cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of amyloid-β1-42 (Aβ1–42) and plaque burden measured by amyloid imaging as well as between pathologically increased levels of CSF tau and the extent of neurodegeneration measured by MRI has led to growing interest in using these biomarkers to predict the presence of AD plaque and tangle pathology. A challenge for the widespread use of these CSF biomarkers is the high variability in the assays used to measure these analytes which has been ascribed to multiple pre-analytical and analytical test performance factors. To address this challenge, we conducted a seven-center inter-laboratory standardization study for CSF total tau (t-tau), phospho-tau (p-tau181) and Aβ1–42 as part of the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Aliquots prepared from five CSF pools assembled from multiple elderly controls (n = 3) and AD patients (n = 2) were the primary test samples analyzed in each of three analytical runs by the participating laboratories using a common batch of research use only immunoassay reagents (INNO-BIA AlzBio3, xMAP technology, from Innogenetics) on the Luminex analytical platform. To account for the combined effects on overall precision of CSF samples (fixed effect), different laboratories and analytical runs (random effects), these data were analyzed by mixed-effects modeling with the following results: within center %CV 95% CI values (mean) of 4.0–6.0% (5.3%) for CSF Aβ1–42; 6.4–6.8% (6.7%) for t-tau and 5.5–18.0% (10.8%) for p-tau181 and inter-center %CV 95% CI range of 15.9–19.8% (17.9%) for Aβ1–42, 9.6–15.2% (13.1%) for t-tau and 11.3–18.2% (14.6%) for p-tau181. Long-term experience by the ADNI biomarker core laboratory replicated this degree of within-center precision. Diagnostic threshold CSF concentrations for Aβ1–42 and for the ratio t-tau/Aβ1–42 were determined in an ADNI independent, autopsy-confirmed AD cohort from whom ante-mortem CSF was obtained, and a clinically defined group of cognitively normal controls (NCs) provides statistically significant separation of those who progressed from MCI to AD in the ADNI study. These data suggest that interrogation of ante-mortem CSF in cognitively impaired individuals to determine levels of t-tau, p-tau181 and Aβ1–42, together with MRI and amyloid imaging biomarkers, could replace autopsy confirmation of AD plaque and tangle pathology as the “gold standard” for the diagnosis of definite AD in the near future.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andreasen N, Hesse C, Davidsson P et al (1999) Cerebrospinal fluid beta-amyloid(1–42) in Alzheimer disease: differences between early- and late-onset Alzheimer disease and stability during the course of disease. Arch Neurol 56:673–680
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  2. Bates D, Maechler M (2010) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-34. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
  3. Bjerke M, Portelius E, Minthon L et al (2010) Confounding factors influencing amyloid beta concentration in cerebrospinal fluid. Int J Alz Dis (in press)
  4. Buerger K, Ewers M, Pirttila T et al (2006) CSF phosphorylated tau protein correlates with neocortical neurofibrillary pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 129:3035–3041
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Buerger K, Frisoni G, Uspenskaya O et al (2009) Validation of Alzheimer’s disease CSF and plasma biological markers: the multicentre reliability study of the pilot European Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (E-ADNI). Exp Gerontol 44:579–585
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  6. Clark CM, Xie S, Chittams J et al (2003) Cerebrospinal fluid tau and beta-amyloid: how well do these biomarkers reflect autopsy-confirmed dementia diagnoses? Arch Neurol 60:1696–1702
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Craig-Shapiro R, Fagan AM, Holtzman DM (2009) Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Dis 35:128–140
    Article Google Scholar
  8. Dean RA, Shaw LM (2010) Use of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for diagnosis of incipient Alzheimer disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Clin Chem 56:7–9
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  9. Fagan AM, Roe CM, Xiong C et al (2007) Cerebrospinal fluid tau/β-amyloid42 ratio as a prediction of cognitive decline in non-demented older adults. Arch Neurol 64:343–349
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Fagan AM et al (2009) Decreased cerebrospinal fluid Aβ42 correlates with brain atrophy in cognitively normal elderly. Ann Neurol 65:176–183
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  11. Frank RA, Galasko D, Hampel H et al (2003) Biological markers for therapeutic trials in Alzheimer’s disease. Proceedings of the biological markers working group: NIA initiative on neuroimaging in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 24:521–536
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Galasko D, Chang L, Motter R et al (1998) High cerebrospinal fluid tau and low Aβ42 levels in the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer disease in relation to apolipoprotein E genotype. Arch Neurol 55:937–945
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  13. Goedert M, Spillantini MG, Jakes R, Rutherford D, Crowther RA (1989) Multiple isoforms of human microtubule-associated protein tau: sequences and localization in neurofibrillary tangles of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 3:519–526
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  14. Gordon RF, McDade RL (1997) Multiplexed quantification of human IgG, IgA, and IgM with the FlowMetrix system. Clin Chem 43:1799–1801
    PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  15. Grimmer T, Riemenschneider M, Forstl H et al (2009) Beta amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease: increased deposition in brain is reflected in reduced concentration in cerebrospinal fluid. Biol Psychiatry 65:927–934
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  16. Hampel H, Blennow K, Shaw LM et al (2010) Total and phosphorylated tau protein as biological markers of Alzheimer’s disease. Exp Gerontol 45:30–40
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  17. Hampel H, Shen Y, Walsh DM et al (2010) Biological markers of β-amyloid related mechanisms in Alzheimer’s disease. Exp Neurol 223:334–346
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  18. Hansson O, Zetterberg H, Buchhave P et al (2006) Association between CSF biomarkers and incipient Alzheimer’s disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a follow-up study. Lancet Neurol 5:228–234
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  19. Herukka SK, Helisalmi S, Hallikainen M, Tervo S, Soininen H, Pirttila T (2007) CSF Abeta42, tau and phosphorylated tau, APOE epsilon4 allele and MCI type in progressive MCI. Neurobiol Aging 28:507–514
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  20. Hulstaert F, Blennow K, Ivanoiu A et al (1999) Improved discrimination of AD patients using beta-amyloid(1–42) and tau levels in CSF. Neurology 52:1555–1562
    PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  21. Jack CR, Knopman DS, Jagust WJ et al (2010) Modeling dynamic markers of the Alzheimer’s pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol 9:119–128
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  22. Jagust WJ, Landau SM, Shaw LM et al (2009) Relationships between biomarkers in aging and dementia. Neurology 73:1193–1199
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  23. Lewczuk P, Beck G, Ganslandt O et al (2006) International quality control survey of neurochemical dementia diagnostics. Neurosci Lett 409:1–4
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  24. Lewczuk P, Beck G, Esselmann H et al (2006) Effect of sample collection tubes on cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of tau proteins and amyloid beta peptides. Clin Chem 52:332–334
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  25. Li G, Sokal I, Quinn JF et al (2007) CSF tau/Aβ42 ratio for increased risk of mild cognitive impairment: a follow-up study. Neurology 69:631–639
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  26. Mattsson N, Zetterberg H, Hansson O et al (2009) CSF biomarkers and incipient Alzheimer disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment. JAMA 302:385–393
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  27. Motter R et al (1995) Reduction of β-amyloid peptide42 in the spinal fluid of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol 38:643–648
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  28. Oliver KG, Kettman JR, Fulton RJ (1998) Multiplexed analysis of human cytokines by use of the FlowMetrix system. Clin Chem 44:2057–2060
    PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  29. Olsson A, Vanderstichele H, Andreasen N et al (2005) Simultaneous measurement of β-amyloid(1–42), total tau, and phosphorylated tau (Thr181) in cerebrospinal fluid by the xMAP technology. Clin Chem 51:336–345
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  30. Parnetti L, Lanari A, Silvestri G, Saggese E, Reboldi P (2006) Diagnosing prodromal Alzheimer’s disease: role of CSF biochemical markers. Mech Ageing Dev 127:129–132
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  31. Pica-Mendez AM, Tanen M, Dallob A, Tanaka W, Laterza OF (2010) Nonspecific binding of Aβ1–42 to polypropylene tubes and the effect of Tween-20. Clin Chim Acta (in press)
  32. R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org
  33. Schoonenboom NS, Pijnenburg YA, Mulder C et al (2004) Amyloid β(1–42) and phosphorylated tau in CSF as markers for early-onset Alzheimer disease. Neurology 62:1580–1584
    PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  34. Schoonenboom NS, Mulder C, Vanderstichele H et al (2005) Effects of processing and storage conditions on amyloid β(1–42) and tau concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid: implications for use in clinical practice. Clin Chem 51:189–195
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  35. Shaw LM, Korecka M, Clark CM, Lee VM-Y, Trojanowski JQ (2007) Biomarkers of neurodegeneration for diagnosis and monitoring therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov 6:295–303
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  36. Shaw LM, Vanderstichele H, Knapik-Czajka M et al (2009) Cerebrospinal fluid biomarker signature in Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative subjects. Ann Neurol 65:403–413
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  37. Snider BJ, Fagan AM, Roe C et al (2009) Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and rate of cognitive decline in very mild dementia of the Alzheimer type. Arch Neurol 66:638–645
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  38. Strozyk D, Blennow K, White LR, Launer LJ (2003) CSF Aβ 42 levels correlate with amyloid-neuropathology in a population-based autopsy study. Neurology 60:652–656
    PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  39. Sunderland T, Linker G, Mirza N et al (2003) Decreased beta-amyloid1–42 and increased tau levels in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. JAMA 289:2094–2103
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  40. Tapiola T, Alafuzoff I, Herukka S-K et al (2009) Cerebrospinal fluid β-amyloid 42 and tau proteins as biomarkers of Alzheimer-type pathologic changes in the brain. Arch Neurol 66:382–389
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Trojanowski JQ, Vanderstichele H, Korecka M et al (2010) Update on the biomarker core of the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative subjects. Alzheimers Dement 6:230–238
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  42. Vanderstichele H, DeMeyer L, DeRoo K et al (2005) Standardized multiparameter quantification of biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease in cerebrospinal fluid. In: Fisher A, Hanin I, Memo M, Stocchi F (eds) New trends in Alzheimer and Parkinson related disorders: ADPD 2005. Medimond Srl, Bologna, pp 183–189
  43. Vanderstichele H, DeMeyer G, Shapiro F et al (2008) Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers: from concept to clinical utility. In: Galimberti D, Scarpini E (eds) Biomarkers for early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease. Nova Science Publishers Inc., Hauppauge, NY, pp 81–122
    Google Scholar
  44. Verwey NA, van der Flier WM, Blennow K et al (2009) A worldwide multicentre comparison of assays for cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Clin Biochem 46:235–240
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgments

Data collection and sharing for this project was funded by the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (National Institutes of Health Grant U01 AG024904). ADNI is funded by the National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, and through generous contributions from the following: Abbott, AstraZeneca AB, Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai Global Clinical Development, Elan Corporation, Genentech, GE Healthcare, GlaxoSmithKline, Innogenetics, Johnson and Johnson, Eli Lilly and Co., Medpace, Inc., Merck and Co., Inc., Novartis AG, Pfizer Inc, F. Hoffman-La Roche, Schering-Plough, Synarc, Inc., as well as non-profit partners the Alzheimer’s Association and Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation, with participation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Private sector contributions to ADNI are facilitated by the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (http://www.fnih.org). The grantee organization is the Northern California Institute for Research and Education, and the study is coordinated by the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study at the University of California, San Diego. ADNI data are disseminated by the Laboratory for Neuro Imaging at the University of California, Los Angeles. This research was also supported by NIH grants P30 AG010129, K01 AG030514, and the Dana Foundation., V. M-.Y. Lee is supported by the Marian S Ware Alzheimer Program, the John H Ware 3rd Professorship for Alzheimer’s Disease Research and JQT is supported by (AG10124) from the NIH (National Institute on Aging) and the William Maul Measy-Truman Schnabel Jr MD Professorship of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology. We are grateful to Drs. H. Arai, K. Blennow, C. Clark, A. Fagan (provided by Wash U ADRC [through NIH grants P50AG005681, P01AG003991, P01AG026276, John Morris PI]), and H. Soares for providing aliquots of non-ADNI CSF samples to prepare the CSF quality control pools used in this investigation.

Conflict of interest

Leslie Shaw has served on technical advisory boards for Bristol Myers Squibb and Innogenetics; Piotr Lewczuk is a consultant to Innogenetics. Kaj Blennow has served on a technical advisory board for Innogenetics. No conflicts of interest declared by the other authors of this manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Holly Soares
    Present address: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT, 06492-1996, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 7 Founders Pavilion, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
    Leslie M. Shaw, Malgorzata Knapik-Czajka, Michal Figurski, Virginia M.-Y. Lee & John Q. Trojanowski
  2. Department of Diagnostic Development, Innogenetics NV (Now Part of Fujirebio), Ghent, Belgium
    Hugo Vanderstichele & Els Coart
  3. Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Mölndal, Sweden
    Kaj Blennow
  4. Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, CT, USA
    Holly Soares
  5. Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, PA, USA
    Adam J. Simon & William Potter
  6. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    Piotr Lewczuk
  7. Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA
    Robert A. Dean & Eric Siemers
  8. Institute on Aging, Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
    Virginia M.-Y. Lee & John Q. Trojanowski

Authors

  1. Leslie M. Shaw
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Hugo Vanderstichele
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Malgorzata Knapik-Czajka
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Michal Figurski
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Els Coart
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  6. Kaj Blennow
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  7. Holly Soares
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  8. Adam J. Simon
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  9. Piotr Lewczuk
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  10. Robert A. Dean
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  11. Eric Siemers
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  12. William Potter
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  13. Virginia M.-Y. Lee
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  14. John Q. Trojanowski
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Corresponding author

Correspondence toLeslie M. Shaw.

Additional information

Data used in the preparation of this article were obtained through support from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), and the full data set is posted on the ADNI website (http://www.loni.ucla.edu\ADNI) in compliance with NIH governance rules for ADNI. Although no ADNI biosamples were used in this inter-laboratory performance study which was essential for studies of ADNI CSF samples, we also report on data here from studies that were performed using ADNI CSF samples with the methods defined here. As such, other ADNI investigators contributed to the design and implementation of ADNI and/or provided samples, but did not participate in analysis or writing of this report. These other ADNI investigators are listed at http://www.loni.ucla.edu\ADNI\Collaboration\ADNI.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shaw, L.M., Vanderstichele, H., Knapik-Czajka, M. et al. Qualification of the analytical and clinical performance of CSF biomarker analyses in ADNI.Acta Neuropathol 121, 597–609 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-011-0808-0

Download citation

Keywords