Towards reconciling structure and function in the nuclear pore complex (original) (raw)

• Aaronson RP, Blobel G (1974) On the attachment of the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol 62:746–754
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Akey CW (1989) Interactions and structure of the nuclear-pore complex revealed by cryo-electron microscopy. J Cell Biol 109:955–970
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Akey CW (1990) Visualization of transport-related configurations of the nuclear-pore transporter. Biophys J 58:341–355
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Akey CW, Goldfarb DS (1989) Protein import through the nuclear-pore complex is a multistep process. J Cell Biol 109:971–982
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Akey CW, Radermacher M (1993) Architecture of the xenopus nuclear-pore complex revealed by 3-dimensional cryoelectron microscopy. J Cell Biol 122:1–19
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Ball JR, Ullman KS (2005) Versatility at the nuclear pore complex: lessons learned from the nucleoporin Nup153. Chromosoma 114:319–330
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Bayliss R, Leung SW, Baker RP, Quimby BB, Corbett AH, Stewart M (2002a) Structural basis for the interaction between NTF2 and nucleoporin FxFG repeats. EMBO J 21:2843–2853
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Bayliss R, Littlewood T, Stewart M (2000) Structural basis for the interaction between FxFG nucleoporin repeats and importin-beta in nuclear trafficking. Cell 102:99–108
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Bayliss R, Littlewood T, Strawn LA, Wente SR, Stewart M (2002b) GLFG and FxFG nucleoporins bind to overlapping sites on importin-beta. J Biol Chem 277:50597–50606
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Beck M, Forster F, Ecke M, Plitzko JM, Melchior F, Gerisch G, Baumeister W, Medalia O (2004) Nuclear pore complex structure and dynamics revealed by cryoelectron tomography. Science 306:1387–1390
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Beck M, Lucic V, Forster F, Baumeister W, Medalia O (2007) Snapshots of nuclear pore complexes in action captured by cryo-electron tomography. Nature 449:611–615
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Bednenko J, Cingolani G, Gerace L (2003) Importin beta contains a COOH-terminal nucleoporin binding region important for nuclear transport. J Cell Biol 162:391–401
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Ben-Efraim I, Gerace L (2001) Gradient of increasing affinity of importin beta for nucleoporins along the pathway of nuclear import. J Cell Biol 152:411–417
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Berke IC, Boehmer T, Blobel G, Schwartz TU (2004) Structural and functional analysis of Nup133 domains reveals modular building blocks of the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol 167:591–597
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Bernad R, Engelsma D, Sanderson H, Pickersgill H, Fornerod M (2006) Nup214-Nup88 nucleoporin subcomplex is required for CRM1-mediated 60 S preribosomal nuclear export. J Biol Chem 281:19378–19386
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Brown HG, Hoh JH (1997) Entropic exclusion by neurofilament sidearms: a mechanism for maintaining interfilament spacing. Biochemistry 36:15035–15040
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Bustamante C, Marko JF, Siggia ED, Smith S (1994) Entropic elasticity of lambda-phage DNA. Science 265:1599–1600
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Callan HG, Tomlin SG (1950) Experimental studies on amphibian oocyte nuclei. I. Investigation of the structure of the nuclear membrane by means of the electron microscope. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 137:367–378
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Cronshaw JA, Krutchinsky AN, Zhang WZ, Chait BT, Matunis MJ (2002) Proteomic analysis of the mammalian nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol 158:915–927
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Danker T, Schillers H, Storck J, Shahin V, Kramer B, Wilhelmi M, Oberleithner H (1999) Nuclear hourglass technique: an approach that detects electrically open nuclear pores in Xenopus laevis oocyte. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:13530–13535
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Denning DP, Patel SS, Uversky V, Fink AL, Rexach M (2003) Disorder in the nuclear pore complex: the FG repeat regions of nucleoporins are natively unfolded. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:2450–2455
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Denning DP, Rexach MF (2007) Rapid evolution exposes the boundaries of domain structure and function in natively unfolded FG nucleoporins. Mol Cell Proteomics 6:272–282
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Denning DP, Uversky V, Patel SS, Fink AL, Rexach M (2002) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae nucleoporin Nup2p is a natively unfolded protein. J Biol Chem 277:33447–33455
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Devos D, Dokudovskaya S, Williams R, Alber F, Eswar N, Chait BT, Rout MP, Sali A (2006) Simple fold composition and modular architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:2172–2177
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Drin G, Casella JF, Gautier R, Boehmer T, Schwartz TU, Antonny B (2007) A general amphipathic alpha-helical motif for sensing membrane curvature. Nat Struct Mol Biol 14:138–146
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Dunker AK, Lawson JD, Brown CJ, Williams RM, Romero P, Oh JS, Oldfield CJ, Campen AM, Ratliff CR, Hipps KW, Ausio J, Nissen MS, Reeves R, Kang CH, Kissinger CR, Bailey RW, Griswold MD, Chiu M, Garner EC, Obradovic Z (2001) Intrinsically disordered protein. J Mol Graph Model 19:26–59
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Dutta AK, Belfort G (2007) Adsorbed gels versus brushes: viscoelastic differences. Langmuir 23:3088–3094
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Enss K, Danker T, Schlune A, Buchholz I, Oberleithner H (2003) Passive transport of macromolecules through Xenopus laevis nuclear envelope. J Membr Biol 196:147–155
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Fahrenkrog B, Aebi U (2003) The nuclear pore complex: nucleocytoplasmic transport and beyond. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4:757–766
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Fahrenkrog B, Hurt EC, Aebi U, Pante N (1998) Molecular architecture of the yeast nuclear pore complex: localization of Nsp1p subcomplexes. J Cell Biol 143:577–588
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Fahrenkrog B, Maco B, Fager AM, Koser J, Sauder U, Ullman KS, Aebi U (2002) Domain-specific antibodies reveal multiple-site topology of Nup153 within the nuclear pore complex. J Struct Biol 140:254–267
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Feldherr CM, Akin D (1997) The location of the transport gate in the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Sci 110(Pt 24):3065–3070
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Franke WW (1974) Structure, biochemistry, and functions of the nuclear envelope. Int Rev Cytol Suppl 4:71–236
  CAS Google Scholar
• Franke WW, Scheer U (1970) The ultrastructure of the nuclear envelope of amphibian oocytes: a reinvestigation. II. The immature oocyte and dynamic aspects. J Ultrastruct Res 30:317–327
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Frey S, Gorlich D (2007) A saturated FG-repeat hydrogel can reproduce the permeability properties of nuclear pore complexes. Cell 130:512–523
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Frey S, Richter RP, Gorlich D (2006) FG-rich repeats of nuclear pore proteins form a three-dimensional meshwork with hydrogel-like properties. Science 314:815–817
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Gall JG (1967) Octagonal nuclear pores. J Cell Biol 32:391–399
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Gerace L, Burke B (1988) Functional organization of the nuclear envelope. Annu Rev Cell Biol 4:335–374
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Gorlich D, Kutay U (1999) Transport between the cell nucleus and the cytoplasm. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 15:607–660
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Gorlich D, Pante N, Kutay U, Aebi U, Bischoff FR (1996) Identification of different roles for RanGDP and RanGTP in nuclear protein import. EMBO J 15:5584–5594
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Gorlich D, Prehn S, Laskey RA, Hartmann E (1994) Isolation of a protein that is essential for the first step of nuclear-protein import. Cell 79:767–778
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Grant RP, Hurt E, Neuhaus D, Stewart M (2002) Structure of the C-terminal FG-nucleoporin binding domain of Tap/NXF1. Nat Struct Biol 9:247–251
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Grant RP, Neuhaus D, Stewart M (2003) Structural basis for the interaction between the Tap/NXF1 UBA domain and FG nucleoporins at 1 Å resolution. J Mol Biol 326:849–858
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Griffis ER, Altan N, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Powers MA (2002) Nup98 is a mobile nucleoporin with transcription-dependent dynamics. Mol Biol Cell 13:1282–1297
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Griffis ER, Craige B, Dimaano C, Ullman KS, Powers MA (2004) Distinct functional domains within nucleoporins Nup153 and Nup98 mediate transcription-dependent mobility. Mol Biol Cell 15:1991–2002
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Halperin A, Tirrell M, Lodge TP (1992) Tethered chains in polymer microstructures. Adv Polym Sci 100:31–71
  CAS Google Scholar
• Handa N, Kukimoto-Niino M, Akasaka R, Kishishita S, Murayama K, Terada T, Inoue M, Kigawa T, Kose S, Imamoto N, Tanaka A, Hayashizaki Y, Shirouzu M, Yokoyama S (2006) The crystal structure of mouse Nup35 reveals atypical RNP motifs and novel homodimerization of the RRM domain. J Mol Biol 363:114–124
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Higa MM, Alam SL, Sundquist WI, Ullman KS (2007) Molecular characterization of the ran-binding zinc finger domain of NUP153. J Biol Chem 282:17090–17100
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Hinshaw JE, Carragher BO, Milligan RA (1992) Architecture and design of the nuclear-pore complex. Cell 69:1133–1141
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Hodel AE, Hodel MR, Griffis ER, Hennig KA, Ratner GA, Xu S, Powers MA (2002) The three-dimensional structure of the autoproteolytic, nuclear pore-targeting domain of the human nucleoporin Nup98. Mol Cell 10:347–358
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Hutten S, Kehlenbach RH (2006) Nup214 is required for CRM1-dependent nuclear protein export in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 26:6772–6785
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Isgro TA, Schulten K (2005) Binding dynamics of isolated nucleoporin repeat regions to importin-β. Structure 13:1869–1879
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Isgro TA, Schulten K (2007a) Association of nuclear pore FG-repeat domains to NTF2 import and export complexes. J Mol Biol 366:330–345
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Isgro TA, Schulten K (2007b) Cse1p-binding dynamics reveal a binding pattern for FG-repeat nucleoporins on transport receptors. Structure 15:977–991
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Jaggi RD, Franco-Obregon A, Ensslin K (2003a) Quantitative topographical analysis of nuclear pore complex function using scanning force microscopy. Biophys J 85:4093–4098
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Jaggi RD, Franco-Obregon A, Muhlhausser P, Thomas F, Kutay U, Ensslin K (2003b) Modulation of nuclear pore topology by transport modifiers. Biophys J 84:665–670
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Kessel RG (1969) Fine structure of the pore-annulus complex in the nuclear envelope and annulate lamellae of germ cells. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat 94:441–453
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Marmo C, Somorjai GA (2001) Friction studies of hydrogel contact lenses using AFM: non-crosslinked polymers of low friction at the surface. Biomaterials 22:3285–3294
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Opdahl A, Marmo C, Somorjai GA (2002) AFM and SFG studies of pHEMA-based hydrogel contact lens surfaces in saline solution: adhesion, friction, and the presence of non-crosslinked polymer chains at the surface. Biomaterials 23:1657–1666
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Kiseleva E, Allen TD, Rutherford S, Bucci M, Wente SR, Goldberg MW (2004) Yeast nuclear pore complexes have a cytoplasmic ring and internal filaments. J Struct Biol 145:272–288
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Kopito RB, Elbaum M (2007) Reversibility in nucleocytoplasmic transport. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:12743–12748
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Kubitscheck U, Grunwald D, Hoekstra A, Rohleder D, Kues T, Siebrasse JP, Peters R (2005) Nuclear transport of single molecules: dwell times at the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol 168:233–243
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Lim RYH, Aebi U, Stoffler D (2006a) From the trap to the basket: getting to the bottom of the nuclear pore complex. Chromosoma 115:15–26
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Lim RYH, Fahrenkrog B (2006) The nuclear pore complex up close. Curr Opin Cell Biol 18:342–347
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Lim RYH, Fahrenkrog B, Koser J, Schwarz-Herion K, Deng J, Aebi U (2007a) Nanomechanical basis of selective gating by the nuclear pore complex. Science 318:640–643
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Lim RYH, Huang NP, Koser J, Deng J, Lau KHA, Schwarz-Herion K, Fahrenkrog B, Aebi U (2006b) Flexible phenylalanine–glycine nucleoporins as entropic barriers to nucleocytoplasmic transport. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:9512–9517
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Lim RYH, Koser J, Huang NP, Schwarz-Herion K, Aebi U (2007b) Nanomechanical interactions of phenylalanine–glycine nucleoporins studied by single molecule force-volume spectroscopy. J Struct Biol 159:277–289
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Liu SM, Stewart M (2005) Structural basis for the high-affinity binding of nucleoporin Nup1p to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae importin-beta homologue, Kap95p. J Mol Biol 349:515–525
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Macara IG (2001) Transport into and out of the nucleus. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 65:570–594
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Maeshima K, Yahata K, Sasaki Y, Nakatomi R, Tachibana T, Hashikawa T, Imamoto F, Imamoto N (2006) Cell-cycle-dependent dynamics of nuclear pores: pore-free islands and lamins. J Cell Sci 119:4442–4451
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Marko JF, Siggia ED (1995) Stretching DNA. Macromolecules 28:8759–8770
  CAS Google Scholar
• Maul GG (1971) On the octagonality of the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol 51:558–563
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Mazzanti M, Bustamante JO, Oberleithner H (2001) Electrical dimension of the nuclear envelope. Physiol Rev 81:1–19
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Melcak I, Hoelz A, Blobel G (2007) Structure of Nup58/45 suggests flexible nuclear pore diameter by intermolecular sliding. Science 315:1729–1732
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Melchior F, Paschal B, Evans J, Gerace L (1993) Inhibition of nuclear-protein import by nonhydrolyzable analogs of GTP and identification of the small GTPase Ran/TC4 as an essential transport factor. J Cell Biol 123:1649–1659
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Milner ST (1991) Polymer brushes. Science 251:905–914
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Moore MS, Blobel G (1993) The GTP-binding protein Ran/TC4 is required for protein import into the nucleus. Nature 365:661–663
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Mooren OL, Erickson ES, Moore-Nichols D, Dunn RC (2004) Nuclear side conformational changes in the nuclear pore complex following calcium release from the nuclear membrane. Phys Biol 1:125–134
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay R, Hoh JH (2001) AFM force measurements on microtubule-associated proteins: the projection domain exerts a long-range repulsive force. FEBS Lett 505:374–378
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Nachury MV, Weis K (1999) The direction of transport through the nuclear pore can be inverted. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:9622–9627
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Naim B, Brumfeld V, Kapon R, Kiss V, Nevo R, Reich Z (2007) Passive and facilitated transport in nuclear pore complexes is largely uncoupled. J Biol Chem 282:3881–3888
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Napetschnig J, Blobel G, Hoelz A (2007) Crystal structure of the N-terminal domain of the human protooncogene Nup214/CAN. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:1783–1788
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Paine PL, Moore LC, Horowitz SB (1975) Nuclear-envelope permeability. Nature 254:109–114
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Pante N, Aebi U (1995) Toward a molecular understanding of the structure and function of the nuclear pore complex. Int Rev Cytol 162B:225–255
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Pante N, Aebi U (1996) Molecular dissection of the nuclear pore complex. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 31:153–199
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Pante N, Kann M (2002) Nuclear pore complex is able to transport macromolecules with diameters of similar to 39 nm. Mol Biol Cell 13:425–434
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Paradise A, Levin MK, Korza G, Carson JH (2007) Significant proportions of nuclear transport proteins with reduced intracellular mobilities resolved by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. J Mol Biol 365:50–65
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Patel SS, Belmont BJ, Sante JM, Rexach MF (2007) Natively unfolded nucleoporins gate protein diffusion across the nuclear pore complex. Cell 129:83–96
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Paulillo SM, Phillips EM, Koser J, Sauder U, Ullman KS, Powers MA, Fahrenkrog B (2005) Nucleoporin domain topology is linked to the transport status of the nuclear pore complex. J Mol Biol 351:784–798
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Paulillo SM, Powers MA, Ullman KS, Fahrenkrog B (2006) Changes in nucleoporin domain topology in response to chemical effectors. J Mol Biol 363:39–50
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Peters R (2005) Translocation through the nuclear pore complex: Selectivity and speed by reduction-of-dimensionality. Traffic 6:421–427
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Radu A, Blobel G, Moore MS (1995a) Identification of a protein complex that is required for nuclear-protein import and mediates docking of import substrate to distinct nucleoporins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:1769–1773
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Radu A, Moore MS, Blobel G (1995b) The peptide repeat domain of nucleoporin Nup98 functions as a docking site in transport across the nuclear-pore complex. Cell 81:215–222
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Rexach M, Blobel G (1995) Protein import into nuclei—association and dissociation reactions involving transport substrate, transport factors, and nucleoporins. Cell 83:683–692
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Ribbeck K, Gorlich D (2002) The permeability barrier of nuclear pore complexes appears to operate via hydrophobic exclusion. EMBO J 21:2664–2671
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Robinson MA, Park S, Sun ZY, Silver PA, Wagner G, Hogle JM (2005) Multiple conformations in the ligand-binding site of the yeast nuclear pore-targeting domain of Nup116p. J Biol Chem 280:35723–35732
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Rout MP, Aitchison JD (2001) The nuclear pore complex as a transport machine. J Biol Chem 276:16593–16596
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Rout MP, Aitchison JD, Magnasco MO, Chait BT (2003) Virtual gating and nuclear transport: the hole picture. Trends Cell Biol 13:622–628
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Rout MP, Aitchison JD, Suprapto A, Hjertaas K, Zhao YM, Chait BT (2000) The yeast nuclear pore complex: composition, architecture, and transport mechanism. J Cell Biol 148:635–651
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Sabri N, Roth P, Xylourgidis N, Sadeghifar F, Adler J, Samakovlis C (2007) Distinct functions of the Drosophila Nup153 and Nup214 FG domains in nuclear protein transport. J Cell Biol 178:557–565
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Schwartz TU (2005) Modularity within the architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Curr Opin Struct Biol 15:221–226
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Schwarz-Herion K, Maco B, Sauder U, Fahrenkrog B (2007) Domain topology of the p62 complex within the 3-D architecture of the nuclear pore complex. J Mol Biol 370:796–806
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Shahin V, Danker T, Enss K, Ossig R, Oberleithner H (2001) Evidence for Ca2+- and ATP-sensitive peripheral channels in nuclear pore complexes. FASEB J 15:1895–1901
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Shulga N, Goldfarb DS (2003) Binding dynamics of structural nucleoporins govern nuclear pore complex permeability and may mediate channel gating. Mol Cell Biol 23:534–542
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Soullam B, Worman HJ (1995) Signals and structural features involved in integral membrane protein targeting to the inner nuclear membrane. J Cell Biol 130:15–27
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Stewart M (2007) Molecular mechanism of the nuclear protein import cycle. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8:195–208
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Stoffler D, Feja B, Fahrenkrog B, Walz J, Typke D, Aebi U (2003) Cryo-electron tomography provides novel insights into nuclear pore architecture: implications for nucleocytoplasmic transport. J Mol Biol 328:119–130
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Stoffler D, Goldie KN, Feja B, Aebi U (1999) Calcium-mediated structural changes of native nuclear pore complexes monitored by time-lapse atomic force microscopy. J Mol Biol 287:741–752
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Strawn LA, Shen TX, Shulga N, Goldfarb DS, Wente SR (2004) Minimal nuclear pore complexes define FG repeat domains essential for transport. Nat Cell Biol 6:197–206
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Suntharalingam M, Wente SR (2003) Peering through the pore: nuclear pore complex structure, assembly, and function. Dev Cell 4:775–789
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Terry LJ, Wente SR (2007) Nuclear mRNA export requires specific FG nucleoporins for translocation through the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol 178:1121–1132
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Timney BL, Tetenbaum-Novatt J, Agate DS, Williams R, Zhang WZ, Chait BT, Rout MP (2006) Simple kinetic relationships and nonspecific competition govern nuclear import rates in vivo. J Cell Biol 175:579–593
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Tompa P (2002) Intrinsically unstructured proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 27:527–533
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Tran EJ, Wente SR (2006) Dynamic nuclear pore complexes: life on the edge. Cell 125:1041–1053
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Unwin PN, Milligan RA (1982) A large particle associated with the perimeter of the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol 93:63–75
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• van Deursen J, Boer J, Kasper L, Grosveld G (1996) G2 arrest and impaired nucleocytoplasmic transport in mouse embryos lacking the proto-oncogene CAN/Nup214. EMBO J 15:5574–5583
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Walther TC, Pickersgill HS, Cordes VC, Goldberg MW, Allen TD, Mattaj IW, Fornerod M (2002) The cytoplasmic filaments of the nuclear pore complex are dispensable for selective nuclear protein import. J Cell Biol 158:63–77
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Wang HW, Clapham DE (1999) Conformational changes of the in situ nuclear pore complex. Biophys J 77:241–247
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Wang RW, Brattain MG (2007) The maximal size of protein to diffuse through the nuclear pore is larger than 60 kDa. FEBS Lett 581:3164–3170
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Weirich CS, Erzberger JP, Berger JM, Weis K (2004) The N-terminal domain of Nup159 forms a beta-propeller that functions in mRNA export by tethering the helicase Dbp5 to the nuclear pore. Mol Cell 16:749–760
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Weis K (2003) Regulating access to the genome: nucleocytoplasmic transport throughout the cell cycle. Cell 112:441–451
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Weis K (2007) The nuclear pore complex: oily spaghetti or gummy bear? Cell 130:405–407
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Winey M, Yarar D, Giddings TH Jr, Mastronarde DN (1997) Nuclear pore complex number and distribution throughout the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle by three-dimensional reconstruction from electron micrographs of nuclear envelopes. Mol Biol Cell 8:2119–2132
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Wozniak RW, Rout MP, Aitchison JD (1998) Karyopherins and kissing cousins. Trends Cell Biol 8:184–188
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Yang Q, Rout MP, Akey CW (1998) Three-dimensional architecture of the isolated yeast nuclear pore complex: functional and evolutionary implications. Mol Cell 1:223–234
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Yang WD, Gelles J, Musser SM (2004) Imaging of single-molecule translocation through nuclear pore complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:12887–12892
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Yang WD, Musser SM (2006) Nuclear import time and transport efficiency depend on importin beta concentration. J Cell Biol 174:951–961
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Zeitler B, Weis K (2004) The FG-repeat asymmetry of the nuclear pore complex is dispensable for bulk nucleocytoplasmic transport in vivo. J Cell Biol 167:583–590
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Zhao B, Brittain WJ (2000) Polymer brushes: surface-immobilized macromolecules. Prog Polym Sci 25:677–710
  CAS Google Scholar
• Zilman A, Di Talia S, Chait BT, Rout MP, Magnasco MO (2007) Efficiency, selectivity, and robustness of nucleocytoplasmic transport. PLoS Comput Biol 3:1281–1290
  CAS Google Scholar
• Zimmerman SB, Minton AP (1993) Macromolecular crowding—biochemical, biophysical, and physiological consequences. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 22:27–65
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar