Is your choice my choice? The owners’ effect on pet dogs’ (Canis lupus familiaris) performance in a food choice task (original) (raw)

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of owners on their dogs’ performance in a food choice task using either different or equal quantities of food. Fifty-four pet dogs were tested in three different conditions. In Condition 1 we evaluated their ability to choose between a large and small amount of food (quantity discrimination task). In Condition 2 dogs were again presented with a choice between the large and small food quantity, but only after having witnessed their owner favouring the small quantity. In Condition 3 dogs were given a choice between two equally small quantities of food having witnessed their owner favouring either one or the other. A strong effect of the owner on the dogs’ performance was observed. In Condition 1 dogs as a group chose significantly more often the large food quantity, thus showing their ability to solve the quantity discrimination task. After observing their owner expressing a preference for the small food quantity they chose the large quantity of food significantly less than in the independent choice situation. The tendency to conform to the owner’s choice was higher when the dogs had to choose between equally small quantities of food (Condition 3) rather than between a large and a small one (Condition 2). These results provide evidence that dogs can be influenced by their owners even when their indications are clearly in contrast with direct perceptual information, thus leading dogs to ultimately make counterproductive choices.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

• Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
• Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
• Cancel anytime View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Fig. 2

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Fig. 3

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

• Appleby D, Pluijmakers J (2003) Separation anxiety in dogs: the function of homeostasis in its development and treatment. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 19(4):205–215
  Article Google Scholar
• Bräuer J, Kaminski J, Riedel J, Call J, Tomasello M (2006) Making inferences about the location of hidden food: social dog, Causal Ape. J Comp Psychol 120(1):38–47
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Cattet J, Etienne AS (2006) Blindfolded dogs relocate a target through path integration. Anim Behav 68(1):203–212
  Article Google Scholar
• Collier-Baker E, Davis JM, Suddendorf T (2004) Do dogs (Canis familiaris) understand invisible displacement? J Comp Psychol 118(4):421–433
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Coppinger R, Coppinger L (2001) Dogs: a startling new understanding of canine origin, behavior and evolution. Scribner, New York
  Google Scholar
• Csányi V, Topál J, Gacsi M, Sarkozi Z (2001) Distinguishing logic from association in the solution of an invisible displacement task by children (Homo sapiens) and dogs (Canis familiaris): using negation of disjunction. J Comp Psychol 115(3):219–226
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• De Rosa C. (2007) Capacità cognitive del cane domestico (Canis familiaris): effetti dell’interazione tra apprendimento e comunicazione sociale. Doctoral Thesis, University of Milan
• Dumas C, Page DD (2006) Strategy planning in dogs (Canis familiaris) in a progressive elimination task. Behav Processes 73(1):22–28
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Fallani G, Prato-Previde E, Valsecchi P (2006) Do disrupted early attachments affect the relationship between guide dogs and blind owners? Appl Anim Behav Sci 100(3–4):241–257
  Article Google Scholar
• Hare B, Tomasello M (2005) Human-like social skills in dogs? Trends Cogn Sci 9(9):439–444
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Hare B, Call J, Tomasello M (1998) Communication of food location between human and dog. Evol Commun 2(1):137–159
  Google Scholar
• Hare B, Brown M, Williamson C, Tomasello M (2002) The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298(5598):1634–1636
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Hsu Y, Serpell JA (2003) Development and validation of a questionnaire for measuring behavior and temperament traits in pet dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 223(9):1293–1300
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Jagoe A, Serpell JA (1996) Owner characteristics and interactions and the prevalence of canine behaviour problems. Appl Anim Behav Sci 47:31–42
  Article Google Scholar
• Kaminski J, Call J, Fischer J (2004) Word learning in a domestic dog: evidence for “Fast Mapping”. Science 304:1682–1683
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Kubinyi E, Topál J, Miklósi Á, Csányi V (2003) Dogs (Canis familiaris) learn from their owners via observation in a manipulation task. J Comp Psychol 117(2):156–165
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Lindberg S, Strandberg E, Swenson L (2004) Genetic analysis of hunting behaviour in Swedish Flatcoated Retrievers. Appl Anim Behav Sci 88(3–4):289–298
  Article Google Scholar
• McKinley J, Sambrook T (2000) Use of human-given cues by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and horses (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn 3:13–22
  Article Google Scholar
• Mech L, Wolf P, Packard JM (1999) Regurgitative food transfer among wild wolves. Can J Zool 77:1192–1195
  Article Google Scholar
• Miklósi Á, Soproni K (2006) A comparative analysis of animals’ understanding of the human pointing gesture. Anim Cogn 9:81–93
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Miklósi Á, Polgárdi, Topál J, Csányi V (2000) Intentional behaviour in dog-human communication: an experimental analysis of “showing” behaviour in the dog. Anim Cogn 3:159–166
  Article Google Scholar
• Miklósi Á, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Gacsi M, Virányi Z, Csányi V (2003) A simple reason for a big difference: wolves do not look back at humans, but dogs do. Curr Biol 13:763–766
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Miklósi Á, Topál J, Csányi V (2004) Comparative social cognition: what can dogs teach us? Anim Behav 67:995–1004
  Article Google Scholar
• Moriguchi Y, Itakura S (2005) Does pointing comprehension disturb controlling action? Evidence from 2-year-old children. Proceedings of 4th IEEE internatinal conference on development and learning 102–105
• Osthaus B, Slater AM, Lea SEG (2003a) Can dogs defy gravity? A comparison with the human infant and a non-human primate. Dev Sci 6(5):489–497
  Article Google Scholar
• Osthaus B, Lea SEG, Slater AM (2003b) Training influences problem-solving abilities in dogs (Canis lupus familiaris). Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of British Society of Animal Science, York 103
• Osthaus B, Lea SEG, Slater AM (2005) Dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fail to show understanding of means-end connections in a string-pulling task. Anim Cogn 8:37–47
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Packard JM (2003) Wolf behavior: reproductive, social and intelligent. In: Mech LD, Mech LB (eds) Wolves: behavior, ecology, and conservation, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
  Google Scholar
• Parthasarathy V, Crowell-Davis SL (2006) Relationship between attachment to owners and separation anxiety in pet dogs (Canis lupus familiaris). J Vet Behav: Clinical Appl Res 1(3):109–120
  Article Google Scholar
• Prato-Previde E, Custance DM, Spiezio C, Sabatini F (2003) Is the dog-human relationship an attachment bond? An observational study using Ainsworth’s strange situation. Behaviour 140:225–254
  Article Google Scholar
• Schleidt WM, Shalter MD (2003) Co-evolution of humans and canids an alternative view of dog domestication: homo homini lupus? Evol Cogn 9(1):57–72
  Google Scholar
• Schwab C, Huber L (2006) Obey or not obey? Dogs (Canis familiaris) behave differently in response to attentional states of their owners. J Comp Psychol 120(3):169–175
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Slabbert JM, Rasa OAE (1997) Observational learning of an acquired maternal behaviour pattern by working dog pups: an alternative training method? Appl Anim Behav Sci 53(4):309–316
  Article Google Scholar
• Soproni K, Miklósi A, Topál J, Csányi V (2001) Comprehension of human communicative signs in pet dogs (Canis familiaris). J Comp Psychol 115(2):122–126
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Soproni K, Miklósi Á, Topál J, Csányi V (2002) Dogs’ (Canis familiaris) responsiveness to human pointing gestures. J Comp Psychol 116(1):27–34
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Szetei V, Miklósi Á, Topál J, Csányi V (2003) When dogs seem to lose their nose: an investigation on the use of visual and olfactory cues in communicative context between dog and owner. Appl Anim Behav Sci 83:141–152
  Article Google Scholar
• Takeuchi Y, Ogata N, Houpt KA, Scarlett JM (2001) Differences in background and outcome of three behavior problems of dogs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 70:297–308
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Topál J, Miklósi Á, Csányi V, Dóka A (1998) Attachment behaviour in dogs (Canis familiaris): a new application of Ainsworth’s (1969) strange situation test. J Comp Psychol 112(3):219–229
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Topál J, Gácsi M, Miklósi Á, Virányi Z, Kubinyi E, Csányi V (2005) Attachment to humans: a comparative study on hand-reared wolves and differently socialized dog puppies. Anim Cogn 70:1367–1375
  Google Scholar
• Ward C, Smuts B (2006) Quantity-based judgments in the domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris). Anim Cogn 10:71–80
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• West RE, Young RJ (2002) Do domestic dogs show any evidence of being able to count? Anim Cogn 5:183–186
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Zentall TR (2006) Imitation: definitions, evidence and mechanisms. Anim Cogn 9:335–353
  Article PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by funds from the Università di Milano to Emanuela Prato-Previde, by a doctoral grant to Sarah Marshall-Pescini from the same University and by funds from Università di Parma to Paola Valsecchi. We are grateful to Marcello Cesa-Bianchi, founder of the Institute of Psychology of the University of Milan, for his longstanding support to research on animal behaviour. We thank Marco Poli for allowing us to carry out the work in the Institute of Psychology and for his continuous support, and the “Well Done Training School” and “Scuola Cinofila Viridea” for participating in the study providing help and support. A special thanks to Laura Sabbadini for her invaluable help in data collection and scoring and to Adam Miklósi for suggestions on an earlier version of the manuscript. Finally, we would like to thank all the owners and dogs that participated as volunteers. This research complies with the current Italian laws on animal welfare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

1. Istituto di Psicologia, Università di Milano, Via T. Pini 1, 20134, Milan, Italy
   E. Prato-Previde & S. Marshall-Pescini
2. Dipartimento di Biologia Evolutiva e Funzionale, Università di Parma, Parma, Italy
   P. Valsecchi

Authors

1. E. Prato-Previde
2. S. Marshall-Pescini
3. P. Valsecchi

Corresponding author

Correspondence toE. Prato-Previde.

Appendix 1 Breeds of participating dogs

Appendix 1 Breeds of participating dogs

Pure-bred dogs tested in the study included 6 Golden Retrievers, 8 Labrador Retrievers, 1 Flatcoated Retriever, 1 Chesapeake Bay Retriever, 1 Nova Scotia Duck-tolling Retriever, 1 Doberman, 4 Terranova, 1 Border Collie, 1 Bernese Mountain Dog, 1 Shetland Sheepdog, 1 Cavalier King Charles Spaniel, 2 German Shepherds, 1 Scottish Collie, 1 Jack Russell, 1 Toy Poodle, 1 San Bernard, 1 Cocker Spaniel, 1 Italian Spinone, 1 Australian shepherd, 1 Afghan hound, 1 Rottweiler.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prato-Previde, E., Marshall-Pescini, S. & Valsecchi, P. Is your choice my choice? The owners’ effect on pet dogs’ (Canis lupus familiaris) performance in a food choice task.Anim Cogn 11, 167–174 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-007-0102-7

Download citation

• Received: 21 February 2007
• Revised: 26 June 2007
• Accepted: 28 June 2007
• Published: 20 July 2007
• Issue date: January 2008
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-007-0102-7

Keywords