Global bias reliability in dogs (Canis familiaris) (original) (raw)
Adams B, Chan A, Callahan H, Milgram NW (2000) The canine as a model of human cognitive ageing: recent developments. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 24:675–692. doi:10.1016/S0278-5846(00)00101-9 ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Allison PD (2001) Logistic regression using SAS system: theory and application. Wiley-SAS, Cary Google Scholar
Ashton RL, De Lillo C (2011) Association, inhibition, and object permanence in dogs’ (Canis familiaris) spatial search. J Comp Psychol 125:194–206. doi:10.1037/a0022584 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Dale G, Arnell KM (2010) Individual differences in dispositional focus of attention predict attentional blink magnitude. Atten Percept Psychophys 72:602–606. doi:10.3758/APP.72.3.602 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Dale G, Arnell KM (2015) Multiple measures of dispositional global/local bias predict attentional blink magnitude. Psychol Res 79:534547. doi:10.1007/s00426-014-0591-3 Article Google Scholar
De Lillo C, Spinozzi G, Palumbo M, Giustino G (2011) Attention allocation modulates the processing of hierarchical visual patterns: a comparative analysis of capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) and humans. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 37:341–352. doi:10.1037/a0022989 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Deruelle C, Fagot J (1998) Visual search for global/local stimulus features in humans and baboons. Psychon Bull Rev 5:476–481 Article Google Scholar
Fagot J, Tomonaga M (1999) Global and local processing in humans (Homo sapiens) and chimpanzees (Pan troglocytes): use of a visual search task with compound stimuli. J Comp Psychol 113:3–12 Article Google Scholar
Fremouw T, Herbranson WT, Shimp CP (1998) Priming of attention to local or global levels of visual analysis. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 24:278–290 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Fremouw T, Herbranson WT, Shimp CP (2002) Dynamic shift of pigeon local/global attention. Anim Cogn 5:233–243 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Goto K, Wills AJ, Lea SEG (2004) Global-feature classification can be acquired more rapidly than local-feature classification in both humans and pigeons. Anim Cogn 7:109–113. doi:10.1007/s10071-003-0193-8 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Hejjas K, Vas J, Kubinyi E, Sasvari-Szekely M, Miklósi Á, Ronai Z (2007) Novel repeat polymorphisms of the dopaminergic neurotransmitter genes among dogs and wolves. Mamm Genome 18:871–879. doi:10.1007/s00335-007-9070-0 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Helton WS, Hayrynen L, Schaeffer D (2009) Sustained attention to local and global target features is different: performance and tympanic membrane temperature. Brain Cogn 71:9–13 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Kimchi R (1992) Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: a critical review. Psychol Bull 112:24–38 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kimchi R (1998) Uniform connectedness and grouping in the perceptual organization of hierarchical patterns. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:1105–1118 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kinchla RA, Wolfe JM (1979) The order of visual processing: “Top-down”, “bottom-up”, or “middle-out”. Percept Psychophys 25:225–231 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kinchla RA, Solis-Macias V, Hoffman J (1983) Attending to different levels of structure in a visual image. Percept Psychophys 33:1–10 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Lamb MR, Robertson LC (1987) The effects of acute alcohol on attention and the processing of hierarchical patterns. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 11:243–248 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Lamb MR, Robertson LC (1988) The processing of hierarchical stimuli: effects of retinal locus, locational uncertainty, and stimulus identity. Percept Psychophys 44:172–181 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Laude JR, Pattison KF, Rayburn-Reeves RM, Michler DM, Zentall TR (2016) Who are the real bird brains? Qualitative differences in behavioral flexibility between dogs (Canis familiaris) and pigeons (Columba livia). Anim Cogn 19:163–169. doi:10.1007/s10071-015-0923-8 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Lim J, Wu W, Wang J, Detre JA, Dinges DF, Rao H (2010) Imaging brain fatigue from sustained mental workload: an ASL perfusion study of the time-on-task effect. Neuroimage 49:3426–3435. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.020 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Lux S, Marshall JC, Thimm M, Fink GR (2008) Differential processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in young and older healthy adults: implications for pathology. Cortex 44:21–28. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2005.08.001 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Moritz S, Wendt M (2006) Processing of local and global visual features in obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Int Neuropsych Soc 12:566–569. doi:10.1017/S1355617706060577 Article Google Scholar
Müller CA, Riemer S, Range F, Huber L (2014) The use of a displacement device negatively affects the performance of dogs (Canis familiaris) in visible object displacement tasks. J Comp Psychol 128:240–250. doi:10.1037/a0036032 ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Racca A, Amadei E, Ligout S, Guo K, Meints K, Mills D (2010) Discrimination of human and dog faces and inversion responses in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Anim Cogn 13:525–533. doi:10.1007/s10071-009-0303-3 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Racca A, Guo K, Meints K, Mills DS (2012) Reading faces: differential lateral gaze bias in processing canine and human facial expressions in dogs and 4-year-old children. Pub Libr Sci One 7:e36076. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036076 CAS Google Scholar
Robertson LC, Egly R, Lamb MR, Kerth L (1993) Spatial attention and cuing to global and local levels of hierarchical structure. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 19:471–487 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Scherf KS, Luna B, Kimchi R, Minshew N, Behrmann M (2008) Missing the big picture: impaired development of global shape processing in autism. Autism 1:114–129 Article Google Scholar
Slavin MJ, Mattingley JB, Bradshaw JL, Storey E (2002) Local-global processing in Alzheimer’s disease: an examination of interference, inhibition and priming. Neuropsychologia 40:1173–1186. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00225-1 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Song Y, Hakoda Y (2015) Lack of global precedence and global-to-local interference without local processing deficit: a robust finding in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder under different visual angles of the Navon task. Neuropsychology 29:888–894. doi:10.1037/neu0000213 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Spinozzi G, De Lillo C, Salvi V (2006) Local advantage in the visual processing of hierarchical stimuli following manipulations of stimulus size and element numerosity in monkeys (Cebus apella). Behav Brain Res 166:45–54. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2005.06.043 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Steiger H (1980) Test for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychol Bull 87:245–251 Article Google Scholar
Törnqvist H, Kujala MV, Somppi S, Hänninen L, Pastell M, Krause CM, Kujala J, Vainio O (2013) Visual event-related potentials of dogs: a non-invasive electroencephalography study. Anim Cogn 6:973–982. doi:10.1007/s10071-013-0630-2 Article Google Scholar
Wallis LJ, Range F, Mueller CA, Serisier S, Huber L, Virányi Z (2014) Lifespan development of attentiveness in domestic dogs: drawing parallels with humans. Front Psychol 5:1–13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00071 Article Google Scholar
Ward ML (1982) Determinants of attention to local and global features of visual forms. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 8:562–581 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar