Do domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) perceive the Delboeuf illusion? (original) (raw)
Agrillo C, Piffer L, Bisazza A (2011) Number versus continuous quantity in numerosity judgments by fish. Cognition 119:281–287 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Agrillo C, Miletto Petrazzini ME, Tagliapietra C, Bisazza A (2012) Inter-specific differences in numerical abilities among teleost fish. Front Psychol 3:483 PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Agrillo C, Piffer L, Adriano A (2013) Individual differences in non-symbolic numerical estimation predict mathematical abilities but contradict ATOM. Behav Brain Funct 9:26 ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Agrillo C, Parrish AE, Beran MJ (2014a) Do rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) perceive the Zöllner illusion? Psychon Bull Rev 21(4):986–994 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Agrillo C, Parrish AE, Beran MJ (2014b) Do primates see the solitaire illusion differently? A comparative assessment of humans (Homo sapiens), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), rhesus mon- keys (Macaca mulatta), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). J Comp Psychol 128(4):402–413 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Baker JM, Morath J, Rodzon KS, Jordan KE (2012) A shared system of representation governing quantity discrimination in canids. Front Psych 3:387 Google Scholar
Bánszegi O, Urrutia A, Szenczi P, Hudson R (2016) More or less: spontaneous quantity discrimination in the domestic cat. Anim Cogn 19(5):879–888 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Benhar E, Samuel D (1982) Visual illusions in the baboon (Papio anibis). Anim Learn Behav 10:115–118 Article Google Scholar
Brannon EM, Lutz D, Cordes S (2006) The development of area discrimination and its implications for number representation in infancy. Dev Sci 9:F59–F64 ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Byosiere SE, Feng LC, Woodhead JK, Rutter NJ, Chouinard PA, Howell TJ, Bennett PC (2016) Visual perception in domestic dogs: susceptibility to the Ebbinghaus– Titchener and Delboeuf illusions. Anim Cogn. doi:10.1007/s10071-016-1067-1
Davis B, Payne CR, Bui M (2016) Making small food units seem regular: how larger table size reduces calories to be consumed. J Ass Consum Res 1(1):115–124
Dominy NJ, Lucas PW (2001) Ecological importance of trichromatic vision to primates. Nature 410:363–366 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Fagnani J, Barrera G, Carballo F, Bentosela M (2016) Is previous experience important for inhibitory control? A comparison between shelter and pet dogs in A-not-B and cylinder tasks. Anim Cogn 19:1165–1172 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Fujita K, Matsuzawa T (1990) Delayed figure reconstruction by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and humans (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol 104:345–351 Article Google Scholar
Guo K, Meints K, Hall C, Hall S, Mills D (2009) Left gaze bias in humans, rhesus monkeys and domestic dogs. Anim Cogn 12:409–418 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Hopkins WD (1997) Hemispheric specialization for local and global processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Neuropsychologia 35:343–348 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hopkins WD, Washburn DA (2002) Matching visual stimuli on the basis of global and local features by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Anim Cogn 5:27–31 ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Horowitz A, Hecht J, Dedrick A (2013) Smelling more or less: investigating the olfactory experience of the domestic dog. Learn Motiv 44(4):207–217 Article Google Scholar
Hunt S, Low J, Burns K (2008) Adaptive numerical competency in a food-hoarding songbird. Proc R Soc Lond B 275:2373–2379 Article Google Scholar
Kanizsa G, Renzi P, Conte S, Compostela C, Guerani L (1993) Amodal completion in mouse vision. Perception 22:713–721 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kelley LA, Endler JA (2012) Illusions promote mating success in great bowerbirds. Science 335:335–338 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kelley LA, Kelley JL (2014) Animal visual illusion and confusion: the importance of a perceptual perspective. Behav Ecol 25:450–463 Article Google Scholar
Kimchi R (1992) Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: a critical review. Psychol Bull 112:24–38 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kwok RM, Braddick OJ (2003) When does the Titchener Circles illusion exert an effect on grasping? Two- and three-dimensional targets. Neuropsychologia 41:932–940 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Lakens D (2013) Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front Psychol 4:863 ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Lamb TD, Collin SP, Pugh EN Jr (2007) Evolution of the vertebrate eye: opsins, photoreceptors, retina and eye cup. Nat Rev Neurosci 8:960–976 ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Lucon-Xiccato T, Miletto Petrazzini ME, Agrillo C, Bisazza A (2015) Guppies discriminate between two quantities of food items but prioritize item size over total amount. Anim Behav 107:183–191 Article Google Scholar
Miletto Petrazzini ME, Wynne CD (2016) What counts for dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) in a quantity discrimination task? Behav Proc 122:90–97 Article Google Scholar
Navon D (1977) Forest before trees: the precedence of global features in visual perception. Cogn Psych 9:353–383 Article Google Scholar
Neitz J, Geist T, Jacobs G (1989) Color vision in the dog. Visual Neurosci 3:119–125 ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Parrish AE, Beran MJ (2014) When less is more: like humans, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) misperceive food amounts based on plate size. Anim Cogn 17:427–434 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Parrish AE, Agrillo C, Perdue B, Beran MJ (2016) The elusive illusion: do children (Homo sapiens) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) see the solitaire illusion? J Child Exp Psychol 142:83–95 Article Google Scholar
Pitteri E, Mongillo P, Carnier P, Marinelli L (2014) Hierarchical stimulus processing by dogs. Anim Cogn 17:869–877 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Racca A, Amadei E, Ligout S, Guo K, Meints K, Mills D (2010) Discrimination of human and dog faces and inversion responses in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Anim Cogn 13:525–533 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Range F, Aust U, Steurer M, Huber L (2008) Visual categorization of natural stimuli by domestic dogs. Anim Cogn 11(2):339–347 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Range F, Jenikejew J, Schröder I, Virányi Z (2014) Difference in quantity discrimination in dogs and wolves. Front Psychol 5:1299 ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Rose D, Bressan P (2002) Going round in circles: shape effects in the Ebbinghaus illusion. Spat Vis 15:191–203 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Stancher G, Rugani R, Regolin L, Vallortigara G (2015) Numerical discrimination by frogs (Bombina orientalis). Anim Cogn 18:219–229 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Suganuma E, Pessoa VF, Monge-Fuentes V, Castro BM, Tavares MCH (2007) Perception of the Müller-Lyer illusion in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Behav Brain Res 182:67–72 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Udell MAR, Dorey NR, Wynne CDL (2008) Wolves outperform dogs in following human social cues. Anim Behav 76:1767–1773 Article Google Scholar
Uller C, Jaeger R, Guidry G, Martin C (2003) Salamanders (Plethodon cinereus) go for more: rudiments of number in an amphibian. Anim Cogn 6(2):105–112 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Van Ittersum K, Wansink B (2007) Do children really prefer large portions? Visual illusions bias their estimates and intake. J Am Diet Assoc 107:1107–1110 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Wansink B, Painter JE, North J (2005) Bottomless bowls: why visual cues of portion size may influence intake. Obes Res 13:93–100 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Ward C, Smuts BB (2007) Quantity-based judgments in the domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris). Anim Cogn 10:71–80 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
West RE, Young RJ (2002) Do domestic dogs show any evidence of being able to count? Anim Cogn 5:183–186 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar