Perspectives on over-marking: is it good to be on top? (original) (raw)
Begg CM, Begg KS, Du Toit JT, Mills MGL (2003) Scent-marking behaviour of the honey badger, Mellivora capensis (Mustelidae), in the southern Kalahari. Anim Behav 66:917–929 Article Google Scholar
Bel MC, Couton J, Sreng L, Allaine D, Bagneres AG, Clement JL (1999) Social signals involved in scent-marking behavior by cheek-rubbing in Alpine marmots (Marmota marmota). J Chem Ecol 25:2267–2283 ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Biben M (1980) Over-marking of alien conspecific odors by Mongolian gerbils. Biol Behav 5:139–145 Google Scholar
Boonstra R, Xia X, Pavone L (1993) Mating system of the meadow vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Behav Ecol 4:83–89 Article Google Scholar
Brashares JS, Arcese P (1999) Scent marking in territorial African antelope: II the economics of marking with faeces. Anim Behav 57:11–17 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Brown RE, Macdonald DW (eds) (1985) Social odours in mammals, vol 1 and 2. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Cohen AB, Johnston RE, Kwon A (2001) How golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) discriminate top from bottom flank scents in over-marks. J Comp Psychol 115:241–247 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Daly M (1977) Some experiments on the functional significance of scent marking in gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus). J Physiol Comp Psychol 91:1082–1094 Article Google Scholar
Dewsbury DA (1990) Individual attributes generate contrasting degrees of sociality in voles. In: Tamarin RH, Ostfeld RS, Pugh SR, Bujalska G (eds) Social systems and population cycles in voles. Birkhauser, Basel, pp 1–9 Google Scholar
Drea CM, Sacha NV, Kim HS, Weldele ML, Glickman SE (2002) Responses to olfactory stimuli in spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta) II. Discrimination of conspecific scent. J Comp Psychol 116:342–349 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Ferkin MH (1999a) Meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus, Arvicolidae), over-mark and adjacent mark the scent marks of same-sex conspecifics. Ethology 105:825–837 Article Google Scholar
Ferkin MH (1999b) Over-marking and adjacent-marking may be used as competitive tactics during odor communication in voles. In: Johnston RE, Muller-Schwarze D, Sorenson PW (eds) Advances in chemical signals in vertebrates, number 8. Plenum Press, New York, pp 239–246
Ferkin MH (2001) The response of individuals to over-marks of conspecifics differs between two species of microtine rodents. In: Marchlewska-Koj A, Lepri JJ, Muller-Schwarze D (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates, vol 9. Plenum Press, New York, pp 343–346
Ferkin MH, Dunsavage J, Johnston RE (1999) What kind of information do meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, use to distinguish between the odors of the top and bottom-scent donors of an over-mark? J Comp Psychol 113:43–51 Article Google Scholar
Ferkin MH, Mech SG, Paz-y-Mino CG (2001a) Scent marking in meadow voles and prairie voles: a test of three hypotheses. Behaviour 138:1319–1336 Article Google Scholar
Ferkin MH, Leonard ST, Bartos K, Schmick MK (2001b) Meadow voles and prairie voles differ in the length of time they prefer the top-scent donor of an over-mark. Ethology 107:1099–1014 Article Google Scholar
Ferkin MH, Lee DN, Leonard ST (2004a) The reproductive state of female voles affects their scent marking behavior and the responses of male conspecifics to such marks. Ethology 110:257–272 Article Google Scholar
Ferkin MH, Li HZ, Leonard ST (2004b) Meadow voles and prairie voles differ in the percentage of conspecific marks that they over-mark. Acta Ethol 7:1–7 Article Google Scholar
Ferkin MH, Pierce AA, Sealand RO, delBarco-Trillo J (2005) Meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, can distinguish more over-marks from fewer over-marks. Anim Cogn 8:82–89 Article Google Scholar
Getz LL, Carter CS (1996) Prairie vole partnerships. Am Sci 84:56–62 Google Scholar
Gosling LM (1982) A reassessment of the function of scent marking in territories. Z Tierpsychol 60:89-118 Google Scholar
Gosling LM, Roberts SC (2001) Scent marking in male mammals: cheat-proof signals to competitors and mates. Adv Study Behav 30:169–217 Article Google Scholar
Hayes RA, Richardson BJ, Wyllie SG (2002) Semiochemicals and social signaling in the wild European rabbit in Australia: I. Scent profiles of chin gland secretion from the field. J Chem Ecol 28:363–384 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Heymann E (1998) Sex differences in olfactory communication in a primate, the moustached tamarin, Saginus mystax (Callitrichinae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:37–45 Article Google Scholar
Huck UW, Lisk RD, Gore AC (1985) Scent marking and mate choice in the golden hamster. Physiol Behav 35:389–393 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Humphries RE, Robertson DH, Beynon R J, Hurst JL (1999) Unravelling the chemical basis of competitive scent marking in mice. Anim Behav 58:1177–1190 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Hurst JL (1990a) Urine marking in populations of wild house mice, Mus domesticus Rutty I. Communication between males. Anim Behav 40:209–222 Article Google Scholar
Hurst JL (1990b) Urine marking in populations of wild house mice, Mus domesticus Rutty II. Communication between females. Anim Behav 40:223–232 Article Google Scholar
Hurst JL (1990c) Urine marking in populations of wild house mice, Mus domesticus Rutty III. Communication between the sexes. Anim Behav 40:233–243 Article Google Scholar
Johnson RP (1973) Scent marking in mammals. Anim Behav 21:521-535 Article Google Scholar
Johnston RE (1999) Scent over-marking: how do hamsters know whose scent is on top and why should it matter. In: Johnston RE, Muller-Schwarze D, Sorenson PW (eds) Advances in chemical signals in vertebrates, vol 8. Plenum Press, New York, pp 227–238
Johnston RE (2001) Scent over-marking: a sexually selected trait with specialized mechanisms for scent deposition and perception_._ Presentation at the 81st American Society of Mammalogist Meeting
Johnston RE (2003) Chemical communication in rodents: from pheromones to individual recognition. J Mammal 84:1141–1162 Article Google Scholar
Johnston RE, Bhorade A (1998) Perception of scent over-marks by golden hamsters (Mesocricetusauratus). Novel mechanisms for determining which individual’s mark are on top. J Comp Psychol 112:230–243 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Johnson CN, Johnson KA (1983) Behaviour of the bilby, Macrotis lagostis (Reid), Marsupiala: Thylacomyidae) in captivity. Aust Wildl Res 10:77–87 Article Google Scholar
Johnston RE, Chiang G, Tung C (1994) The information in scent over-marks of golden hamsters. Anim Behav 48:323–330 Article Google Scholar
Johnston RE, Munver R, Tung C (1995) Scent counter marks: selective memory for the top scent by golden hamsters. Anim Behav 49:1435–1442 Article Google Scholar
Johnston RE, Sorokin ES, Ferkin MH (1997a) Scent counter-marking by male meadow voles: females prefer the top-scent male. Ethology 103:443–453 Article Google Scholar
Johnston RE, Sorokin ES, Ferkin MH (1997b) Female voles discriminate males’ over-marks and prefer top-scent males. Anim Behav 54:679–690 Article Google Scholar
Kappeler PM (1998) To whom it may concern: the transmission and function of chemical signals in Lemur catta. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 42:411–421 Article Google Scholar
Kohli KL, Ferkin MH (1999) Over-marking and adjacent marking are influenced by sibship in prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster. Ethology 105:1–11 Google Scholar
Kruuk H (1995) Wild otters: predation and populations. Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
Lazaro-Perea C, Snowdon CT, Fatima Arruda M (1999) Scent-marking behavior in wild groups of common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:313–324 Article Google Scholar
Leonard ST, Ferkin MH, Johnson MM (2001) The response of meadow voles to an over-mark in which the two donors differ in gonadal hormone status. Anim Behav 62:1171–1177 Article Google Scholar
Lewis RJ (2005) Sex differences in scent-marking in sifaka: mating conflict or male services? Am J Phys Anthropol 128:389–398 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Macdonald DW (1980) Patterns of scent marking with urine and feces among carnivore communities. Symp Zool Soc Lond 45:107–139 Google Scholar
Madison DM (1980) An integrated view of the social biology of meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Biologist 62:20–33 Google Scholar
McClintock MK (2002) Pheromones, Odors, and Vasanas: the neuroendocrinology of social chemosignals in humans and animals. In: Pffaf D (ed) Hormones, Brain, and Behavior. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 797–870
Mertl-Millhollen AS, Goodmann PA, Klinghammer E (1986) Wolf scent-marking with raised-leg urination. Zool Biol 5:7–20 Article Google Scholar
Nevison CM, Barnard CJ, Beynon RJ, Hurst JL (2000) The consequences of inbreeding for recognizing competitors. Proc Biol Sci 267:687–694 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Palagi E, Telara S, Borgognini Tarli SM (2004) Reproductive strategies in Lemur catta: balance among sending, receiving, and countermarking scent signals. Int J Primatol 25:1019–1031 Article Google Scholar
Penzhorn BJ (1984) A long-term study of social organization and behaviour of Cape Mountain zebras (Equs zebra zebra). Zeit Tierpsychol 64:97–146 Google Scholar
Peterson SC (1988) Chemical trail following by caterpillars of Malacosoma neustria. J Chem Ecol 14:815–824 ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Rich TJ, Hurst JL (1998) Scent marks as reliable signals of competitive ability of mates. Anim Behav 56:727–735 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Rich TJ, Hurst JL (1999) The competing counter-marks hypothesis: reliable assessment of competitive ability by potential mates. Anim Behav 58:1027–1037 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Roberts SC, Dunbar RIM (2000) Female territoriality and the function of scent-marking in a monogamous antelope (Oreotragus oreotragus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47:417–423 Article Google Scholar
Rosell F, Bjorkoyli T (2002) A test of the dear enemy phenomenon in the Eurasian beaver. Anim Behav 63:1073–1078 Article Google Scholar
Rosell F, Johnson G, Parker H (2000) Eurasian beavers (Castor fiber) behavioral response to simulated territorial intruders. Can J Zool 78:931–935 Article Google Scholar
Rostain RR, Ben-David M, Groves P, Randall JA (2004) Why do river otters scent mark? An experimental test of several hypotheses. Anim Behav 68:703–711 Article Google Scholar
Rozenfeld FM, Rasmont R (1991) Odour cue recognition by dominant male bank voles, Clethrionomys glareolus. Anim Behav 41:839–850 Article Google Scholar
Rozenfeld FM, LeBoulenge E, Rasmont R (1987) Urine marking by male bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus Schreber 1780; Microtidae, Rodentia) in relation to social rank. Can J Zool 65:2549–2601 Article Google Scholar
Sillero-Zubiri C, Macdonald DW (1998) Scent-marking and territorial behaviour of Ethiopian wolves Canis simensis. J Zool 245:351–361 Article Google Scholar
Sliwa A, Richardson PRK (1998) Responses of aardwolves, Proteles cristatus, Sparrman 1783, to translocated scent marks. Anim Behav 56:137–146 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Smith TE, Abbott DH (1999) Behavioral discrimination between circumgenital odor from peri-ovulatory dominant and anovulatory female common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Am J Primatol 46:265–284 Article Google Scholar
Smith TE, Gordon SJ (2002) Sex differences in olfactory communication in Saguinus labiatus. Int J Primatol 23:429–441 Article Google Scholar
Stralendorf FV (1986) Urinary signaling pheromone and specific behavioral response in tree shrews (Tupaia belangeri) I. Basic investigations for a bioassay. J Chem Ecol 12:1573–1561 Article Google Scholar
Thiessen DD, Rice M (1976) Mammalian scent gland marking and social behavior. Psychol Bull 83:505–539 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Thom MD, Hurst JL (2004) Individual recognition by scent. Ann Zool Fenn 41:765–787 Google Scholar
Thomas SA (2002) Scent marking and mate choice in the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster. Anim Behav 63:1121–1127 Article Google Scholar
Thomas SA, Wolff JO (2002) Scent marking in voles: a reassessment of over marking, counter marking, and self-advertisement. Ethology 108:51–62 Article Google Scholar
Wilcox RM, Johnston RE (1995) Scent-counter marks: specialized mechanisms of perception and response to individual odors in golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). J Comp Psychol 109:349–356 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Wolff JO (2003) Laboratory studies with rodents: facts or artifacts? Bioscience 53:421–427 Article Google Scholar
Wolff JO, Mech SG, Thomas SA (2002) Scent marking in female prairie voles: a test of alternative hypotheses. Ethology 108:483–494 Article Google Scholar
Woodward Jr RL, Schmick MK, Ferkin MH (1999) Response of prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster (Rodentia, Arvicolidae), to scent over-marks of two same-sex conspecifics: a test of the scent masking hypothesis. Ethology 105:1009–1017 Article Google Scholar
Woodward Jr RL, Bartos K, Ferkin MH (2000) Meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) and prairie voles (M. ochrogaster) differ in their responses to over-marks from opposite- and same-sex conspecifics. Ethology 106:979–992 Article Google Scholar