Digital inclusiveness of health information websites (original) (raw)

References

  1. Goldberg, L., Lide, B., Lowry, S., Massett, H.A., O’Connell, T., Preece, J., Quesenbery, W., Shneiderman, B.: Usability and accessibility in consumer health informatics: current trends and future challenges. Am. J. Prev. Med. 40, S187–S197 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AMEPRE.2011.01.009
    Article Google Scholar
  2. Fox, S., Duggan, M.: Health Online 2013. Pew Research Center. National survey by the Pew Research Center’s Internet and American Life Project (2013). http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/. Accessed 5 Nov 2015
  3. Pew Research Center: Demographics of Mobile Device Ownership and Adoption in the United States | Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/mobile/. Accessed 17 June 2017
  4. Pew Research Center: US Smartphone Use in 2015 | Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/01/us-smartphone-use-in-2015/. Accessed 3 Dec 2015
  5. Newman, E.: Corporate Mobile Readiness Report: An Analysis of the Fortune 500’s Presence on the Mobile Web (2012)
  6. Klasnja, P., Pratt, W.: Healthcare in the pocket: mapping the space of mobile-phone health interventions. J. Biomed. Inform. 45, 184–198 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBI.2011.08.017
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Chomutare, T., Fernandez-Luque, L., Arsand, E., Hartvigsen, G.: Features of mobile diabetes applications: review of the literature and analysis of current applications compared against evidence-based guidelines. J. Med. Internet Res. 13, e65 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1874
    Article Google Scholar
  8. Abroms, L.C., Padmanabhan, N., Thaweethai, L., Phillips, T.: iPhone apps for smoking cessation: a content analysis. Am. J. Prev. Med. 40, 279–285 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AMEPRE.2010.10.032
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Matthews, M., Doherty, G.: In the mood: engaging teenagers in psychotherapy using mobile phones. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, pp. 2947–2956 (2011)
  10. Ahtinen, A., Mattila, E., Vaatanen, A., Hynninen, L., Salminen, J., Koskinen, E., Laine, K.: User experiences of mobile wellness applications in health promotion: user study of wellness diary, mobile coach and SelfRelax. In: Proceedings of the 3d International ICST Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, IEEE, pp. 1–8 (2009)
  11. McInnes, D.K., Fix, G.M., Solomon, J.L., Petrakis, B.A., Sawh, L., Smelson, D.A.: Preliminary needs assessment of mobile technology use for healthcare among homeless veterans. Peer J. 3, e1096 (2015). https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1096
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Kumar, S., Nilsen, W.J., Abernethy, A., Atienza, A., Patrick, K., Pavel, M., Riley, W.T., Shar, A., Spring, B., Spruijt-Metz, D., Hedeker, D., Honavar, V., Kravitz, R., Lefebvre, C., Mohr, R., Murphy, D.C., Quinn, S.A., Shusterman, C., Swendeman, V.D: Mobile health technology evaluation: the mHealth evidence workshop. Am. J. Prev. Med. 45, 228–236 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AMEPRE.2013.03.017
    Article Google Scholar
  13. van Velsen, L., Beaujean, D.J., van Gemert-Pijnen, J.E.: Why mobile health app overload drives us crazy, and how to restore the sanity. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 13, 23 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-23
    Article Google Scholar
  14. West, D.M.: State and Federal E-Government in the United States, 2002 (2002)
  15. Marcotte, E.: Responsive Web Design. New York (2014)
  16. Han, S., Yue, Z., He, D.: Understanding and supporting cross-device web search for exploratory tasks with mobile touch interactions. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 33, 1–34 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2738036
    Article Google Scholar
  17. Wroblewski, L.: Mobile First. A Book Apart, New York (2011)
    Google Scholar
  18. McCorkindale, T., Morgoch, M.: An analysis of the mobile readiness and dialogic principles on Fortune 500 mobile websites. Public Relat. Rev. 39, 193–197 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PUBREV.2013.03.008
    Article Google Scholar
  19. Newman, E.: Corporate Mobile Readiness Report (2014)
  20. Vanderheiden, G.C.: Nomadicity, disability access, and the every-citizen interface. In: National Research Council (ed.) More Than Screen Deep: Toward Every-Citizen Interfaces to the Nation’s Information Infrastructure, pp. 297–306. National Academy Press, Washington, DC (1997)
    Google Scholar
  21. W3C: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG/. Accessed 3 June 2017
  22. US Census Bureau: American Community Survey (2008). https://factfinder2.census.gov/. Accessed 10 June 2012
  23. Zickuhr, K., Smith, A.: Digital Differences. Pew Internet and American Life Project (2012)
  24. United Nations: Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Optional Protocol (2007)
  25. United Nations: UN Enable—Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?navid=12&pid=150. Accessed 14 July 2017
  26. Olalere, A., Lazar, J.: Accessibility of US federal government home pages: section 508 compliance and site accessibility statements. Gov. Inf. Q. 28, 303–309 (2011)
    Article Google Scholar
  27. W3C: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/. Accessed 17 Jan 2018
  28. U.S. Access Board: Overview of the Final Rule—United States Access Board. https://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/communications-and-it/about-the-ict-refresh/overview-of-the-final-rule. Accessed 17 Jan 2017
  29. National Association of the Deaf v. Netflix, Inc.: No. 11-CV-30168-MAP (D. Mass. June 19, 2012)
  30. Equality Act: c. 15 (2010)
  31. Isa, W.A.R.W.M., Aziz, M.A., Razak, M.R.B.A.: Evaluating the accessibility of Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) websites in Malaysia. In: 2011 International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr), pp. 135–140. IEEE (2011)
  32. Lazar, J., Olalere, A., Wentz, B.: Investigating the accessibility and usability of job application web sites for blind users. J. Usabil. Stud. 7, 68–87 (2012)
    Google Scholar
  33. Youngblood, N.E., Mackiewicz, J.: A usability analysis of municipal government website home pages in Alabama. Gov. Inf. Q. 29, 582–588 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2011.12.010
    Article Google Scholar
  34. Yu, D.X., Parmanto, B.: US state government websites demonstrate better in terms of accessibility compared to federal government and commercial websites. Gov. Inf. Q. 28, 484–490 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.001
    Article Google Scholar
  35. Gilbertson, T.D., Machin, C.H.C.: Guidelines, icons and marketable skills. In: Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility—W4A’12, p. 1. ACM Press, New York (2012)
  36. Loiacono, E.T., Romano, N.C., McCoy, S.: The state of corporate website accessibility. Commun. ACM. 52, 128 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1562164.1562197
    Article Google Scholar
  37. Xiong, L., Cobanoglu, C., Cummings, P., DeMicco, F.: Website accessibility of US based hospitality websites. In: Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2009, pp. 273–284. Springer, Vienna (2009)
    Chapter Google Scholar
  38. West, D.M., Miller, E.A.: The digital divide in public e-health: barriers to accessibility and privacy in state health department websites. J. Health Care Poor Underserved. 17, 652–667 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2006.0115
    Article Google Scholar
  39. Zeng, X., Parmanto, B.: Web content accessibility of consumer health information web sites for people with disabilities: a cross sectional evaluation. J. Med. Internet Res. 6, e19 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.2.e19
    Article Google Scholar
  40. Reichow, B., Shefcyk, A., Bruder, M.B.: Quality comparison of websites related to developmental disabilities. Res. Dev. Disabil. 34, 3077–3083 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RIDD.2013.06.013
    Article Google Scholar
  41. Hackett, S., Parmanto, B., Zeng, X., Hackett, S., Parmanto, B., Zeng, X.: Accessibility of Internet websites through time. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility—ASSETS’04, p. 32. ACM Press, New York (2004)
  42. Hanson, V.L., Richards, J.T.: Progress on website accessibility? ACM Trans. Web. 7, 1–30 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2435215.2435217
    Article Google Scholar
  43. Lüchtenberg, M., Kuhli-Hattenbach, C., Sinangin, Y., Ohrloff, C., Schalnus, R.: Accessibility of health information on the internet to the visually impaired user. Ophthalmologica. 222, 187–193 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1159/000126082
    Article Google Scholar
  44. Geiger, B., Evans, R., Cellitti, M., Hogan Smith, K., O, M.R., Firsing, I.I.I., Chandan, S.P: The healthy web—access to online health information for individuals with disabilities. Int. Electron. J. Health Educ. 14, 93–100 (2011)
    Google Scholar
  45. Mancini, C., Zedda, M., Barbaro, A.: Health information in Italian public health websites: moving from inaccessibility to accessibility. Heal. Inf. Libr. J. 22, 276–285 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2005.00602.x
    Article Google Scholar
  46. O’Grady, L.: Accessibility compliance rates of consumer-oriented Canadian health care Web sites. Med. Inform. Internet Med. 30, 287–295 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/14639230500367746
    Article Google Scholar
  47. Liang, H., Xue, Y., Chase, S.K.: Online health information seeking by people with physical disabilities due to neurological conditions. Int. J. Med. Inform. 80, 745–753 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJMEDINF.2011.08.003
    Article Google Scholar
  48. West, D.M.: State and Federal Electronic Government in the United States, 2008. (2008)
  49. Fuglerud, K.S., Røssvoll, T.H.: An evaluation of web-based voting usability and accessibility. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 11, 359–373 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-011-0253-9
    Article Google Scholar
  50. Jaeger, P.T.: Assessing section 508 compliance on federal e-government web sites: a multi-method, user-centered evaluation of accessibility for persons with disabilities. Gov. Inf. Q. 23, 169–190 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2006.03.002
    Article Google Scholar
  51. AChecker: IDI Web Accessibility Checker: Web Accessibility Checker. https://achecker.ca/checker/index.php. Accessed 17 Jan 2017
  52. Shneiderman, B.: Universal usability. Commun. ACM. 43, 84–91 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1145/332833.332843
    Article Google Scholar
  53. Johnson, R., Kent, S.: Designing universal access: web-applications for the elderly and disabled. Cogn. Technol. Work. 9, 209–218 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-007-0063-2
    Article Google Scholar
  54. Flavián, C., Guinalíu, M., Gurrea, R.: The role played by perceived usability, satisfaction and consumer trust on website loyalty. Inf. Manag. 43, 1–14 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IM.2005.01.002
    Article Google Scholar
  55. Fogg, B.J., Soohoo, C., Danielson, D.R., Marable, L., Stanford, J., Tauber, E.R.: How do users evaluate the credibility of web sites? In: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Designing for user experiences—DUX’03, p. 1 (2003)
  56. Holzinger, A., Treitler, P., Slany, W.: Making apps useable on multiple different mobile platforms: on interoperability for business application development on smartphones. Multidiscip. Res. Pract. Inf. Syst. 2012, 176–189 (2012)
    Article Google Scholar
  57. Vatavu, R.-D.: Visual impairments and mobile touchscreen interaction: state-of-the-art, causes of visual impairment, and design guidelines. Int. J. Hum Comput Interact. 33, 486–509 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1279827
    Article Google Scholar
  58. Alexa: Alexa—Top Sites by Category: Health.http://www.alexa.com/topsites/category/Top/Health. Accessed 6 Nov 2015
  59. Alexa: Alexa Internet—Our Data. https://support.alexa.com/hc/en-us/articles/200449744-How-are-Alexa-s-traffic-rankings-determined. Accessed 16 Nov 2015
  60. Shen, X., Li, D., Shen, C.: Evaluating China’s university library Web sites using correspondence analysis. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 57, 493–500 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20288
    Article Google Scholar
  61. Lin, L.: Empirical study on evaluation of tourism web sites in China. In: MSIE 2011, pp. 497–499. IEEE (2011)
  62. Kanellopoulos, D., Kotsiantis, S.: Evaluating and recommending Greek newspapers’ websites using clustering. Program 46, 71–91 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1108/00330331211204575
    Article Google Scholar
  63. Lewis, M.S., Marvel, H.P.: When do consumers search? J. Ind. Econ. 59, 457–483 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6451.2011.00459.x
    Article Google Scholar
  64. Lo, B.W.N., Sedhain, R.S.: How reliable are website rankings? Implications for e-business advertising and Internet search. Issues Inf. Syst. 7, 233–238 (2006)
    Google Scholar
  65. Lo, B.W.N., Kao, F.J.: Variation in country-based ranking lists among consumers’ choices of top e-commerce web sites: implications for international e-marketing. Int. J. Bus. Inf. 3, 1 (2015)
    Google Scholar

Download references