AI-driven classrooms: building creative pedagogies through digital literacy and infrastructure empowerment an AI-TPACK approach (original) (raw)

References

  1. Zhou, G., Liu, W., Guo, S., Lin, Y.: Where are we in online project based learning? Evidence from a visualized bibliometric review (20132023). Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 33(3), e70044 (2025)
    Article Google Scholar
  2. Alwakid, W.N., Dahri, N.A., Humayun, M., Alwakid, G.N.: Exploring the role of AI and teacher competencies on instructional planning and student performance in an outcome-based education system. Systems 13(7), 517 (2025)
    Article Google Scholar
  3. Ning, Y., Zhang, C., Xu, B., Zhou, Y., Wijaya, T.T.: Teachers AI-TPACK: exploring the relationship between knowledge elements. Sustainability 16(3), 978 (2024)
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Karata, F., and Atac, B.A.: When TPACK meets artificial intelligence: Analyzing TPACK and AI-TPACK components through structural equation modelling. Educ. Inf. Technol. pp. 1–26 (2024).
  5. Cao, L.: A study on the readiness of English teachers in Macao universities in the era of AI. Asian Educ. Dev. Stud. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-12-2024-0314
    Article Google Scholar
  6. Parviz, M., Arthur, F.: Exploring EFL teachers behavioral intentions to integrate GenAI applications: insights from PLS SEM and fsQCA. Human Behavior Emerg. Technol. 2025(1), 5582099 (2025)
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Statista, “237b545027d1d245d1d54697167ee95db3bb07c3 @ www.statista.com,” Statista. [Online]. Available: https://www.statista.com/topics/6146/education-in-india/
  8. Yim, I.H.Y., Wegerif, R.: Teachers’ perceptions, attitudes, and acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) educational learning tools: an exploratory study on AI literacy for young students. Future Educational Res 2(4), 318–345 (2024)
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Migliorino, N.J., Maiden, J.: Educator attitudes toward electronic grading software. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 36(3), 193–212 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2004.10782412
    Article Google Scholar
  10. Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J.: Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record: Voice Sch. Education 108(6), 1017–1054 (2006)
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Casal-Otero, L., Catala, A., Fernndez-Morante, C., Taboada, M., Cebreiro, B., Barro, S.: AI literacy in K-12: a systematic literature review. Int. J. STEM Educ. 10(1), 29 (2023)
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Yim, I.H.Y.: A critical review of teaching and learning artificial intelligence (AI) literacy: developing an intelligence-based AI literacy framework for primary school education. Comput. Education: Artif. Intell. 7, 100319 (2024)
    Google Scholar
  13. Khoso, A.K., Honggang, W., Darazi, M.A.: Empowering creativity and engagement: the impact of generative artificial intelligence usage on Chines EFL students’ language learning experience. Comput. Human Behavior Rep. 18, 100627 (2025)
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Tan, Q., and Tang, X.: Unveiling AI literacy in K-12 education: A systematic literature review of empirical research. Interact. Learn. Environ. 1–17 (2025).
  15. Zhang, Y., Xue, X., Ding, M., and Yang, X.: Mapping the complexity of learners’ attitudes toward ChatGPT: preliminary validation of a new scale. Behav. Inf. Technol. 1–15 (2025)
  16. Ozturk, E.: Artificial intelligence in early childhood STEM education: a review of pedagogical paradigms, ethical issues, and socio-political implications. J. Educ. Sci. Environ. Health. 11(2), 108–125 (2025)
    Article Google Scholar
  17. ivind Madsen, D., Toston, D.M.: ChatGPT and digital transformation: a narrative review of its role in health, education, and the economy. Digital 5(3), 24 (2025)
    Article Google Scholar
  18. Sun, Y., Liu, F.: Real-world implementation of an AI learning tool-MetaGP-Edu in medical education: a multi-center cohort study. Comput. Educ. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105388
    Article Google Scholar
  19. Adair, A., Pedro, M.S., Gobert, J., and Segan, E.: Real-time AI-driven assessment and scaffolding that Improves students’ mathematical modeling during science investigations. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Springer, 202–216 (2023)
  20. Umutlu, D.: and Gursoy, M.E.: Leveraging artificial intelligence techniques for effective scaffolding of personalized learning in workplaces. Artif. Intell. Educ. Context Work, 59–76 (2022)
  21. Beketov, V., Lebedeva, M., Taranova, M.: The use of artificial intelligence in teaching medical students to increase motivation and reduce anxiety during academic practice. Curr. Psychol. 43(16), 14367–14377 (2024)
    Article Google Scholar
  22. Su, K.-D.: Implementation of innovative artificial intelligence cognitions with problem-based learning guided tasks to enhance studentsperformance in science. J. Balt. Sci. Educ. 21(2), 245–257 (2022)
    Article Google Scholar
  23. Al-Abdullatif, A.M., Alsubaie, M.A.: ChatGPT in learning: assessing students’ use intentions through the lens of perceived value and the influence of AI literacy. Behav. Sci. (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090845
    Article Google Scholar
  24. Kanders, K., Stupple Harris, L., Smith, L., Gibson, J.L.: Perspectives on the impact of generative AI on early childhood development and education. Infant Child Dev. 33(4), e2514 (2024)
    Article Google Scholar
  25. Ruiz Viruel, S., Sánchez Rivas, E., Ruiz Palmero, J.: The role of artificial intelligence in project-based learning: teacher perceptions and pedagogical implications. Educ. Sci. (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020150
    Article Google Scholar
  26. Zhao, C., Chen, B.: ICT in education can improve students’ achievements in rural China: the role of parents, educators and authorities. J. Policy Model. 45(2), 320–344 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPOLMOD.2023.02.007
    Article Google Scholar
  27. Yang, T., Hong, X.: The educational technology divide in Glocalisation: a perspective for interpreting early childhood teachers’ practices of ICT implementation. Early Educ. Dev. 35(1), 150–168 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2023.2231321
    Article Google Scholar
  28. Lee, J., Choi, H.: What affects learner’s higher-order thinking in technology-enhanced learning environments? The effects of learner factors. Comput. Educ. 115, 143–152 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.015
    Article Google Scholar
  29. Luo, W., Yang, W., Berson, I.R.: Digital transformations in early learning: From touch interactions to AI conversations. Taylor & Francis (2024).
  30. Solihat, A.N., Dahlan, D., Kusnendi, K., Susetyo, B., Al Obaidi, A.S.M.: Artificial intelligence (AI)-based learning media: definition, bibliometric, classification, and issues for enhancing creative thinking in education. ASEAN J. Sci. Eng. 4(3), 349–382 (2024)
    Article Google Scholar
  31. Yang, T., Dong, C.: What influences teachers implementation of ICT in early childhood education? A qualitative exploration based on an ecological-TPACK framework. Comput. Education Open 7, 100228 (2024)
    Article Google Scholar
  32. Zaremohzzabieh, Z., Ahrari, S., Abdullah, H., Abdullah, R., Moosivand, M.: Effects of educational technology intervention on creative thinking in educational settings: a meta-analysis. Interact. Technol. Smart Educ. 22(2), 235–265 (2025)
    Article Google Scholar
  33. Heidari-Shahreza, M.A.: Language learning playware: a playful learningapproach to ELT materials development. Innov. Lang. Learn. Teach. 19(3), 276–291 (2025)
    Article Google Scholar
  34. Fields, Z.: The interplay between creativity, thinking styles, higher education, and generative AI. In impacts of generative AI on creativity in higher education, IGI Global, pp. 331–372 (2024).
  35. Stephenson, L.: Collective creativity and wellbeing dispositions: children’s perceptions of learning through drama. Thinking Skills Creativity 47, 101188 (2023)
    Article Google Scholar
  36. Ataner, A., Bostanci, H.B., Kurt, M.: Enhancing education for sustainability using video feedback and playful learning: a case study of north Cyprus schools. Sustainability 17(12), 5603 (2025)
    Article Google Scholar
  37. Hatta, N.M., Ahmad, I., Zakaria, M.H., Murti, H.A.S., Pendit, U.C.: The role of multiplayer online educational games in enhancing critical thinking. IJORER : Int. J. Recent Educational Res. 5(6), 1506–1521 (2024)
    Google Scholar
  38. Fisher, R. et al.: Can ChatGPT enhance business student creativity? Evidence from a randomised controlled trial. Stud. High. Educ. 1–15 (2025)
  39. Feixas, M., Martínez-Usarralde, M.J., López-Martín, R.: Do teaching innovation projects make a difference? Assessing the impact of small-scale funding. Tert. Educ. Manag. 24(4), 267–283 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2017.1417470
    Article Google Scholar
  40. Brauer, R., Ormiston, J., Beausaert, S.: Creativity-fostering teacher behaviors in higher education: a transdisciplinary systematic literature review. Rev. Educ. Res. (2024). https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241258226
    Article Google Scholar
  41. Galve-González, C., Castro-Lopez, A., Cervero, A., Bernardo, A.B.: Overcoming barriers: the role of resilience as a mediating factor in academic engagement. Stud. High. Educ. 5079, 1–16 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2025.2463004
    Article Google Scholar
  42. Scott-Barrett, J., Johnston, S.-K., Denton-Calabrese, T., McGrane, J.A., Hopfenbeck, T.N.: Nurturing curiosity and creativity in primary school classrooms. Teach. Teach. Educ. 135, 104356 (2023)
    Article Google Scholar
  43. Maisyaroh, M., Juharyanto, J., Wiyono, B.B., Nawi, A.M., Adha, M.A., Lesmana, I.: Unveiling the nexus of leadership, culture, learning independence, passion trend-based learning, and teacher creativity in shaping digital student skills. Social Sci. Humanities Open 9, 100884 (2024)
    Google Scholar
  44. Malek, M.S., Bhatt, V.: Examine the comparison of CSFs for public and private sector’s stakeholders: a SEM approach towards PPP in Indian road sector. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 23(13), 2239–2248 (2023)
    Google Scholar
  45. Choksi, M., and Bhatt, V.: Unveiling the future: decrypting mobile investment resistance with multi-stage SEM-ANN-NCA approach. Int. J. Human Computer Interact. 1–18 (2024)
  46. Aw, E.C.-X., Thomas, S., Patel, R., Bhatt, V., Cham, T.-H.: Click to contribute: understanding donation behaviour and well-being in donation-based crowdfunding mobile apps. Int. J. Bank Mark. 42(7), 1835–1866 (2024)
    Article Google Scholar
  47. Thomas, S., Patel, R., Bhatt, V.: Private-label grocery buyers donation intentions and trust in CRM campaigns: an empirical analysis by employing social identity theory. Soc. Bus. Rev. 18(3), 401–421 (2023)
    Article Google Scholar
  48. Campbell, D., Cowton, C.J.: Method issues in business ethics research: finding credible answers to questions that matter. Bus. Ethics: Eur. Rev. 24, S3–S10 (2015)
    Article Google Scholar
  49. Nayak, K., Rajai, R., Bhatt, V., and Aggarwal, M.: Revisiting tomorrow: Gen Z’s innovation-driven destination loyalty through diffusion of innovation and information processing theories. Tour. Recreat. Res., 1–17, (2025)
  50. Hair, J.F., Jr., Matthews, L.M., Matthews, R.L., Sarstedt, M.: PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. Int. J. Multivar. Data Anal. 1(2), 107–123 (2017)
    Article Google Scholar
  51. Hew, T.-S., Syed Abdul Kadir, S.L.: Predicting instructional effectiveness of cloud-based virtual learning environment. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 116(8), 1557–1584 (2016)
    Article Google Scholar
  52. Leong, L.-Y., Hew, T.-S., Ooi, K.-B., Tan, G.W.-H.: Predicting actual spending in online group buyingan artificial neural network approach. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 38, 100898 (2019)
    Article Google Scholar
  53. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.-Y., Podsakoff, N.P.: Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88(5), 879 (2003)
    Article Google Scholar
  54. Kock, N.: Common method bias in PLS-SEM: a full collinearity assessment approach. Int. J. E-Collabor. 11(4), 1–10 (2015)
    Article Google Scholar
  55. Patel, R., Thomas, S., Bhatt, V.: Testing the influence of donation message-framing, donation size, and product type (androgynous luxury: hedonic vs. eco-friendly: utilitarian) on CRM participation intention. J. Nonprofit Public Sect. Mark. 35(4), 391–413 (2023)
    Article Google Scholar
  56. Aggarwal, M., Nayak, K.M. and Bhatt, V.: Examining the factors influencing fintech adoption behaviour of gen Y in India. Cogent Econ. Finan. 11(1), 2197699 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2197699
  57. Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 19(2), 139–152 (2011)
    Article Google Scholar
  58. Trivedi, T., Vora, H., Bhatt, V.: Predicting the antecedents of digital readiness of teachers by examining the mediating role of job satisfaction. Int. J. Innov. Learn. 35(3), 312–337 (2024)
    Article Google Scholar
  59. Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18(1), 39–50 (1981)
    Article Google Scholar
  60. Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. Int. Mark. Rev. 33(3), 405–431 (2016)
    Article Google Scholar
  61. Sarstedt, M., Hair, J.F., Jr., Ringle, C.M.: PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bulletretrospective observations and recent advances. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 31(3), 261–275 (2023)
    Article Google Scholar
  62. Hair, J.F., Risher, J.J., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M.: When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 31(1), 2–24 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-11-2018-0203
    Article Google Scholar
  63. Sarstedt, M., Hair, J.F., Pick, M., Liengaard, B.D., cr mioara Radomir, L., Ringle, C.M.: Progress in partial least squares structural equation modeling use in marketing research in the last decade. Psychol. Mark. 39(5), 1035–1064 (2022)
    Article Google Scholar
  64. Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: A Primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling ({PLS-SEM}). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (2022)
    Google Scholar
  65. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., and Hair, J.F.: Partial least squares structural equation modeling,” in Handbook of market research, Springer, 587–632 (2021).
  66. Sharma, S.K., Al-Badi, A.H., Govindaluri, S.M., Al-Kharusi, M.H.: Predicting motivators of cloud computing adoption: a developing country perspective. Comput. Human Behav. 62, 61–69 (2016)
    Article Google Scholar
  67. Hair, J.F., Risher, J.J., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M.: When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Euro. Bus. Rev. 31(1), 2–24. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  68. Bhatt, V., Pandey, S., Patel, R., Ghodake, S., Jariwala, H., and Thomas, S.: Predicting online donation intention in donation-based crowdfunding apps: a multi-stage SEM-ANN-NCA model integrating anthropomorphism, satisfaction, trust, and privacy concerns. J. Nonprofit Public Sect. Mark. 1–25, (2024)
  69. Cohen, J.F., Korevaar, D.A., Altman, D.G., Bruns, D.E., Gatsonis, C.A., Hooft, L., Irwig, L., Levine, D., Reitsma, J.B., De Vet, H.C., Bossuyt, P.M.: STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration. BMJ Open. 6(11), e012799 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012799
  70. Liébana-Cabanillas, F., Marinković, V., Kalinić, Z.: A SEM-neural network approach for predicting antecedents of m-commerce acceptance. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 37(2), 14–24 (2017)
    Google Scholar
  71. Sim, J.-J., Tan, G.W.-H., Wong, J.C.J., Ooi, K.-B., Hew, T.-S.: Understanding and predicting the motivators of mobile music acceptancea multi-stage MRA-artificial neural network approach. Telemat. Inform. 31(4), 569–584 (2014)
    Article Google Scholar
  72. Taneja, A., Arora, A..: Modeling user preferences using neural networks and tensor factorization model. Int. J. Info. Manag. 45, 132–148 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.010
  73. Haykin, S., Nie, J., Currie, B.: Neural network-based receiver for wireless communications. Electron. Lett. 35(3), 203–205 (1999)
    Article Google Scholar
  74. Ooi, K.-B., Lee, V.-H., Tan, G.W.-H., Hew, T.-S., Hew, J.-J.: Cloud computing in manufacturing: the next industrial revolution in Malaysia? Expert Syst. Appl. 93, 376–394 (2018)
    Article Google Scholar
  75. Chan, F.T.S., Chong, A.Y.L.: A SEMneural network approach for understanding determinants of interorganizational system standard adoption and performances. Decis. Support. Syst. 54(1), 621–630 (2012)
    Article Google Scholar
  76. Johnson, L.M., Rezaee, R., Kadkhodaie, A., Smith, G., Yu, H.: Geochemical property modelling of a potential shale reservoir in the Canning Basin (Western Australia), using artificial neural networks and geostatistical tools. Comput. Geosci. 120, 73–81 (2018)
    Article Google Scholar
  77. Chong, A.Y.L., Liu, M.J., Luo, J., Keng-Boon, O.: Predicting RFID adoption in healthcare supply chain from the perspectives of users. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 159, 66–75 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.034
  78. Leong, L.-Y., Jaafar, N. I., and Ainin, S.: Understanding Facebook commerce (f-commerce) actual purchase from an artificial neural network perspective. J. Electron. Commer. Res., 19(1), (2018)
  79. Suryavanshi, A.K.S., Bhatt, V., Thomas, S., Patel, R., Jariwala, H.: Predicting cause-related marketing patronage intentions, corporate social responsibility motives and moderating role of spirituality. Soc. Responsib. J. 20(4), 682–702 (2024)
    Article Google Scholar
  80. Wang, L., Ertmer, P.A., Newby, T.J.: Increasing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 36(3), 231–250 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2004.10782414
    Article Google Scholar
  81. Navaridas-Nalda, F., Clavel-San Emeterio, M., Fernández-Ortiz, R., Arias-Oliva, M.: The strategic influence of school principal leadership in the digital transformation of schools. Comput. Human Behav. 112, 106481 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106481
    Article Google Scholar
  82. Yue, Y., Ng, S.I., Basha, N.K.: Consumption values, attitudes and continuance intention to adopt ChatGPT-driven E-commerce AI chatbot (LazzieChat). Pak. J. Commer. Soc. Sci. 18(2), 249–284 (2024)
    Article Google Scholar
  83. Jin, H.Y., Su, C.Y., Chen, C.H.: Perceptions of teachers regarding the perceived implementation of creative pedagogy in ‘making’ activities. J. Educ. Res. 114(1), 29–39 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1872471
    Article Google Scholar
  84. Yang, J., Peng, M.Y.P., Wong, S.H., Chong, W.L.: How E-learning environmental stimuli influence determinates of learning engagement in the context of COVID-19? SOR model perspective. Front. Psychol. (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.584976
    Article Google Scholar

Download references