Reducing accidental complexity in domain models (original) (raw)

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: Meta-level Independent Modeling, International Workshop “Model Engineering” (in conjunction with ECOOP’2000), Cannes, France (2000)
  2. Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: The essence of multilevel metamodeling. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on the Unified Modeling Language, Toronto, Canada (2001)
  3. Atkinson C. and Kühne T. (2003). Model-Driven Development: A Metamodeling Foundation. IEEE Softw. 20(5): 36–41
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: Concepts for Comparing Modeling Tool Architectures, In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 8th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, MoDELS/UML 2005
  5. Atkinson C., Kühne T. and Henderson-Sellers B. (2003). Systematic stereotype usage. J. Softw. Syst. Model. 2(3): 153–163
    Article Google Scholar
  6. Brooks, F.P.: No silver bullet: essence and accidents of software engineering. Comput. Archive 20(4), 10–19 (1987) ISSN:0018-9162
    Google Scholar
  7. Coad P. (1992). Object-oriented patterns. Commun. ACM 35(9): 152–159
    Article Google Scholar
  8. Coleman D., Arnold P., Bodo S. Dollin C., Gilchrist H., Hayes F., Jeremaes P. (1994) Object-Oriented Development: The Fusion Method. Prentice-Hall, englewood Cliffs
    Google Scholar
  9. Engels, G., Förster, A., Heckel, R., and Thöne, S.: Process modeling using UML. In: Process-Aware Information Systems. pp. 85–117 Wiley, Chichester,(2005)
  10. Frank, U.: Modeling products for versatile e-commerce platforms—essential requirements and generic design alternatives. In: Arisawa, H., Kambayashi, Y., Kumar, V., Mayr, H.C., Hunt, I. (eds.) Conceptual Modeling for New Information System Technologies, pp. 444–456. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
    Google Scholar
  11. Gonzalez-Perez, C., Henderson-Sellers, B.: A powertype-based metamodelling framework. Softw. Syste. Model. 5(1), (2006)
  12. Goldstein R.C. and Storey V.C. (1994). Materialization. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Eng. 6(5): 835–842
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Henderson-Sellers, B., Gonzalez-Perez, C.: Connecting powertypes and stereotypes. J. Object Technol. 4(7), (2005)
  14. Jarke M., Gallersdörfer R., Jeusfeld M.A., Staudt M. and Eherer S. (1995). ConceptBase—a deductive object base for metadata management. J. Intell. Information Syst. Special Issue Adv. Deductive Object-Oriented Databases 4(2): 167–192
    Google Scholar
  15. Johnson R., Woolf B. (1997) Type Object, In Pattern Languages of Program Design 3. Addison-Wesley, Reading, pp. 47–66.
    Google Scholar
  16. Kühne, T.: Matters of (meta-) modeling. J. Softw. Syst. Model. 5(4), (2006)
  17. Kühne, T., Steimann, F.: Tiefe Charakterisierung. In Proceedings of “Modellierung 2004”. LNI Vol. 45, pp. 121–133
  18. Larman C. (2002) Applying UML and patterns: an introduction to object-oriented analysis and design and the unified process. 2nd (edn) Prentice-Hall, Englewood cliffs
    Google Scholar
  19. Larman C. (2002). Applying UML and patterns: an introduction to object-oriented analysis and design and the unified process.. Prentice-Hall, Englewood cliffs
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
  20. Lyardet, F.: The dynamic template pattern. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Pattern Languages of Design (1997)
  21. Meyer, B.: Object-Oriented Software Construction. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1997) ISBN 0-13-629155-4
  22. Mittelstraß, J. (Ed.) Enzyklopädie Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie. Metzler Verlag, (2004) ISBN: 3476020126
  23. Ludewig J. (2005). Models in software engineering—an introduction. J. Softw. Syst. Model. 2(1): 5–14
    Article Google Scholar
  24. Odell, J.: Power Types. J. Object-Oriented Program. (1994)
  25. OMG: Unified Modeling Language, v1.1. OMG document ad/97-08-04, (1997)
  26. OMG: MDA Guide Version 1.0.1, OMG document omg/03-06-01 (2003)
  27. OMG: Unified Modeling Language, v2.0. OMG document formal/05-07-04, (2005)
  28. Pirotte, A., Zimányi, E., Massart, D., Yakusheva, T:. Materialization: a powerful and ubiquitous abstraction pattern. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Very Large Database, pp. 630–641 (1994)
  29. Riehle, D., Tilman, M., Johnson, R.: Dynamic object model, In: Pattern Languages of Program Design 5. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2005)
  30. Mylopoulos J., Borgida A., Jarke M. and Koubarakis M. (1990). Telos—a language for representing knowledge about information systems. In ACM Trans. Informat. Syst. 8(4): 325–362
    Article Google Scholar
  31. Yoder, J. W., Johnson, R.: The adaptive object model architectural style. In: Proceeding of The Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Softw. Architecture 2002 (WICSA3 ’02)

Download references