Comparison of numerical models of two debris flows in the Cortina d’ Ampezzo area, Dolomites, Italy (original) (raw)

Abstract

The accurate prediction of runout distances, velocities and the knowledge of flow rheology can reduce the casualties and property damage produced by debris flows, providing a means to delineate hazard areas, to estimate hazard intensities for input into risk studies and to provide parameters for the design of protective measures. The application of most of models that describe the propagation and deposition of debris flow requires detailed topography, rheological and hydrological data that are not always available for the debris-flow hazard delineation and estimation. In the Cortina d’Ampezzo area, Eastern Dolomites, Italy, most of the slope instabilities are represented by debris flows; 325 debris-flow prone watersheds have been mapped in the geomorphological hazard map of this area. We compared the results of simulations of two well-documented debris flows in the Cortina d’Ampezzo area, carried on with two different single-phase, non-Newtonian models, the one-dimensional DAN-W and the two-dimensional FLO-2D, to test the possibility to simulate the dynamic behaviour of a debris flow with a model using a limited range of input parameters. FLO-2D model creates a more accurate representation of the hazard area in terms of flooded area, but the results in terms of runout distances and deposits thickness are similar to DAN-W results. Using DAN-W, the most appropriate rheology to describe the debris-flow behaviour is the Voellmy model. When detailed topographical, rheological and hydrological data are not available, DAN-W, which requires less detailed data, is a valuable tool to predict debris-flow hazard. Parameters obtained through back-analysis with both models can be applied to predict hazard in other areas characterized by similar geology, morphology and climate.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

• Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
• Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
• Cancel anytime View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Fig. 2

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Fig. 3

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Fig. 4

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

• FLO-2D Software (2006) FLO-2D, 2-dimensional flood routine model manual vs. 2006.01. Nutrioso, AZ 85932
• Hungr O (1995) A model for the runout analysis of rapid flow slides, debris flows and avalanches. Can Geotech J 32:610–623
  Google Scholar
• Hungr O, Geotechnical Research (2003) DAN-W, User’s Manual. West Vancouver, BC, Canada
• Johnson AM, Rodine JR (1984) Debris flow. In: Brunsden D, Prior DB (eds) Slope instability. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester, UK, pp 257–351
  Google Scholar
• O’Brien JS, Julien PY (1988) Laboratory analysis of mudflows properties. J Hydraulic Engineering ASCE 114(8):877–887
  Article Google Scholar
• O’Brien JS, Julien PY, Fullerton WT (1993) Two-dimensional water flood and mudflow simulation. J Hydraulic Engineering ASCE 119(2):244–259
  Article Google Scholar
• Tecca PR, Galgaro A, Genevois R, Deganutti AM (2003) Development of a remotely controlled debris flow monitoring system in the Dolomites (Acquabona, Italy). Hydrol Processes 17:1771–1784
  Article Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

1. Department of Geosciences, Padova University, Padova, Italy
   Maria Concetta Armento & Rinaldo Genevois
2. Research Institute for Hydrological and Geological Hazard Prevention-CNR, Padova, Italy
   Pia Rosella Tecca

Authors

1. Maria Concetta Armento
2. Rinaldo Genevois
3. Pia Rosella Tecca

Corresponding author

Correspondence toRinaldo Genevois.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Armento, M.C., Genevois, R. & Tecca, P.R. Comparison of numerical models of two debris flows in the Cortina d’ Ampezzo area, Dolomites, Italy.Landslides 5, 143–150 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-007-0111-2

Download citation

• Received: 17 April 2007
• Accepted: 03 October 2007
• Published: 07 December 2007
• Issue date: February 2008
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-007-0111-2

Keywords