The Harm of Symbolic Actions and Green-Washing: Corporate Actions and Communications on Environmental Performance and Their Financial Implications (original) (raw)
References
Adams, M., & Hardwick, P. (1998). An analysis of corporate donations: United Kingdom evidence. Journal of Management Studies,35(5), 641–654. Article Google Scholar
Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review,19, 645–670. Google Scholar
Ambec, S., & Lanoie, P. (2008). Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. The Academy of Management Perspectives,22(4), 45–62. Article Google Scholar
Arevalo, J. A. (2010). Critical reflective organizations: An empirical observation of global active citizenship and green politics. Journal of Business Ethics,96(2), 299–316. Article Google Scholar
Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal,26(3), 197–218. Article Google Scholar
Bansal, P., & Bogner, W. C. (2002). Deciding on ISO 14001: Economics, institutions, and context. Long Range Planning,35(3), 269. Article Google Scholar
Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal,47(1), 93–103. Article Google Scholar
Bansal, P., & Gao, J. (2006). Building the future by looking at the past: Examining published research in organizations and environment. Organization and Environment,19(4), 458–478. Article Google Scholar
Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review,32(3), 794–816. Article Google Scholar
Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2009). Environmental performance and executive compensation: An integrated agency-institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal,52(1), 103–126. Article Google Scholar
Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgements or organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review,36(1), 151–179. Article Google Scholar
Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2008). Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal,29, 1325–1343. Article Google Scholar
Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. The Journal of Management Studies,43(3), 435–455. Article Google Scholar
Brenner, L., Rottenstreich, Y., Sood, S., & Bilgin, B. (2007). On the psychology of loss aversion: Possession, valence, and reversals of the endowment effect. Journal of Consumer Research,34, 369–376. Article Google Scholar
Bromiley, P. (1991). Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Academy of Management Journal,34(1), 37–59. Article Google Scholar
Castelló, I., & Lozano, J. M. (2011). Searching for new forms of legitimacy through corporate responsibility rhetoric. Journal of Business Ethics,100(1), 11–29. Article Google Scholar
Chen, Y. S., Lai, S. B., & Wen, C. T. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics,67, 331–339. Article Google Scholar
Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. (2006). Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: Determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation. Journal of International Business Studies,37, 863–878. Article Google Scholar
Clelland, I. J., Douglas, T. J., & Henderson, D. A. (2006). Testing resource-based and industry factors in a multi-level model of competitive advantage creation. Academy of Strategic Management Journal,5(1), 1–24. Google Scholar
Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management,37(1), 39–67. Article Google Scholar
Dean, T. J., & Brown, R. L. (1995). Pollution regulation as a barrier to new firm entry: Initial evidence and implications for future research. Academy of Management Journal,38, 288–303. Article Google Scholar
Deephouse, D. L. (1999). To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management Journal,20, 147–166. Article Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review,48, 147–160. Article Google Scholar
Dooley, R. S., & Fryxell, G. E. (1999). Are conglomerates less environmentally responsible? An empirical examination of diversification strategy and subsidiary pollution in the U.S. chemical industry. Journal of Business Ethics,21(1), 1–14. Article Google Scholar
Dou, W., & Krishnamurthy, S. (2007). Using brand websites to build brands online: A product versus service brand comparison. Journal of Advertising Research,47(2), 193–206. Article Google Scholar
Douglas, T. J., & Judge, W. Q. Jr. 1995. Integrating the natural environment into the strategic planning process: An empirical assessment. Academy of Management Journal, 00014273, 475–479. Google Scholar
Esrock, S. I., Leichty, G. B. (1998). Social responsibility and corporate Web pages: Self-presentation or agenda-setting? Public Relations Review,24(3), 305–319. Article Google Scholar
Faucheux, S., Nicolai, I., & O’Connor, M. (1998). Globalization, competitiveness, governance and environment: What prospects for a sustainable development? In S. Faucheux, J. Gowdy, & I. Nicola (Eds.), Sustainability and firms, technological change and the changing regulatory environment. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing. Google Scholar
Feldman, S. J., Soyka, P. A., & Ameer, P. (1997). Does improving a firm’s environmental management system and environmental performance result in a higher stock price? Journal of Investing,6(4), 87–97. Article Google Scholar
Ha, L., & James, E. L. (1998). Interactivity re-examined: A baseline analysis of early business Web sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media,42(Fall), 457–474. Article Google Scholar
Habisch, A., Patelli, L., Pedrini, M., & Schwartz, C. (2011). Different talks with different folks: A comparative survey of stakeholder dialog in Germany, Italy, and the U.S. Journal of Business Ethics,100(3), 381–404. Article Google Scholar
Hamilton, J. T. (1995). Pollution as news: Media and stock market reactions to the toxics release inventory data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,28, 98–113. Article Google Scholar
Hargadon, A., & Douglas, Y. (2001). When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly,46, 476–501. Article Google Scholar
Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review,20(4), 986–1014. Google Scholar
Hart, S. L., & Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment,5, 30–37. Article Google Scholar
Hatch, M. J., & Schultz, M. (2011). Are the strategic stars aligned for your corporate brand? Harvard Business Review,79(2), 128–134. Google Scholar
Hawken, P. (1993). The ecology of commerce: A declaration of sustainability. New York: HarperBusiness. Google Scholar
Hillman, A. J., & Hitt, M. A. (1999). Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Academy of Management Review,24(4), 825–842. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Taversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica,47(2), 263–291. Article Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Taversky, A. (1984). Choices, values and frames. American Psychologist,39, 341–350. Article Google Scholar
King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2000). Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s responsible care program. Academy of Management Journal,43(4), 698–716. Article Google Scholar
Klassen, R. D., & Whybark, D. C. (1999). The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Academy of Management Journal,42(6), 599–615. Article Google Scholar
Konar, S., & Cohen, M. A. (2001). Does the market value environmental performance? Review of Economics and Statistics,83(2), 281–289. Article Google Scholar
Korten, D. C. (1995). When corporations rule the world. San Francisco: Kumarian Press Inc./Berrett-Koehler. Google Scholar
Laufer, W. S. (2003). Social accountability and corporate green-washing. Journal of Business Ethics,43(3), 253–261. Article Google Scholar
Lee, S. Y., & Rhee, S.-K. (2007). The change in corporate environmental strategies: A longitudinal empirical study. Management Decision,45(2), 196–216. Article Google Scholar
Lopez-Gamero, M. D., Claver-Cortes, E., & Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2008). Complementary resources and capabilities for an ethical and environmental management: A qual/quan study. Journal of Business Ethics,82(3), 701–732. Article Google Scholar
Macias, W., & Lewis, L. S. (2004). A content analysis of direct-to-consumer (DTC) prescription drug web sites. Journal of Advertising,32(4), 43–56. Google Scholar
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly,48(2), 268–305. Article Google Scholar
McMillan, S. J. (2000). The microscope and the moving target: The challenge of applying content analysis to the World Wide Web. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly,77(1), 80–98. Article Google Scholar
Miles, M. P., & Covin, J. G. (2000). Environmental marketing: A source of reputational, competitive, and financial advantage. Journal of Business Ethics,23(3), 299–311. Article Google Scholar
Miller, K. D., & Leiblein, M. J. (1996). Corporate risk-return relations: Returns variability versus downside risk. Academy of Management Journal,39(1), 91–122. Article Google Scholar
Moore, G. (2001). Corporate social and financial performance: An investigation in the U.K. supermarket industry. Journal of Business Ethics,34(3/4), 299–315. Article Google Scholar
Novemsky, N., & Kahneman, D. (2005). The boundaries of loss aversion. Journal of Marketing Research,42(2), 119–128. Article Google Scholar
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review,16(1), 145–179. Google Scholar
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies,24(3), 403–441. Article Google Scholar
Pacala, S., & Socolow, R. (2004). Stabilization wedges: Solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science,305(5686), 968–972. Article Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row. Google Scholar
Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives,9(4), 97–118. Article Google Scholar
Ramus, C. A., & Montiel, I. (2005). When are corporate environmental policies a form of green-washing? Business and Society,44(4), 377–414. Article Google Scholar
Rao, H. (2002). Tests tell: Institutional activists, constitutive legitimacy and consumer acceptance in the American automobile industry, 1895–1912. In P. Ingram & B. Silverman (Eds.), Advances in strategic management, Vol. 19: The new institutionalism in strategic management. Stanford, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar
Rhee, M., & Haunschild, P. R. (2006). The liability of a good reputation: A study of product recalls in the U.S. automotive industry. Organization Science,17(1), 101–117. Article Google Scholar
Rooney, C. (1993). Economics of pollution prevention: How waste reduction pays. Pollution Prevention Review,3(Summer), 261–276. Google Scholar
Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal,40(3), 534–559. Article Google Scholar
Russo, M. V., & Harrison, N. S. (2005). Organizational design and environmental performance clues from the electronics industry. Academy of Management Journal,48(4), 582–593. Article Google Scholar
Salzmann, O., Ionescu-somers, A., & Steger, U. (2005). The business case for corporate sustainability: Literature review and research options. European Management Journal,23(1), 27–35. Article Google Scholar
Schuler, D. A. (1996). Corporate political strategy and foreign competition: The case of the steel industry. Academy of Management Journal,39(3), 720–737. Article Google Scholar
Stevens, J. M., Steensma, H. K., Harrison, D. A., & Cochran, P. L. (2005). Symbolic or substantive document? The influence of ethics codes on financial executives’ decisions. Strategic Management Journal,26, 181–195. Article Google Scholar
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review,20(3), 571–610. Google Scholar
Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly,50, 35–67. Google Scholar
Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal,40(3), 658–672. Article Google Scholar
Walker, K. (2010). A systematic review of the corporate reputation literature: Definition, measurement and theory. Corporate Reputation Review,12(4), 357–387. Article Google Scholar
Wassmuth, B., & Thompson, D. R. (1999). Banner ads in online newspapers: Are they specific? Paper presented at the American Academy of Advertising annual conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Weaver, G. R., Trevino, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (1999). Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Academy of Management Journal,42(5), 539–552. Article Google Scholar
Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. (1994). Substance and symbolism in CEOs’ long-term incentive plans. Administrative Science Quarterly,39(3), 367–390. Article Google Scholar
Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. (1998). The symbolic management of stockholders: Corporate governance reforms and shareholder reactions. Administrative Science Quarterly,43(1): 127–153. Google Scholar
Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. (2001). Decoupling policy from practice: The case of stock repurchase programs. Administrative Science Quarterly Douglas and Judge is from the best paper proceedings,00014273
Zajac, E. J., & Westphal, J. D. (1995). Accounting for the explanations of CEO compensation: Substance and symbolism. Administrative Science Quarterly,40(2), 283–308. Article Google Scholar