A method to study the impact of climate change on variability of river flow: an example from the Guadalupe River in Texas (original) (raw)
Abstract
This work introduced a method to study river flow variability in response to climate change by using remote sensing precipitation data, downscaled climate model outputs with bias corrections, and a land surface model. A meteorological forcing dataset representing future climate was constructed via the delta change method in which the modeled change was added to the present-day conditions. The delta change was conducted at a fine spatial and temporal scale to contain the signals of weather events, which exhibit substantial responses to climate change. An empirical transformation technique was further applied to the constructed forcing to ensure a realistic range. The meteorological forcing was then used to drive the land surface model to simulate the future river flow. The results show that preserving fine-scale processes in response to climate change is a necessity to assess climatic impacts on the variability of river flow events.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
- Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
- Cancel anytime View plans
Buy Now
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Fig. 1

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 2

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 3

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 4

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 5

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 6

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 7

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 8

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 9

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 10

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
- Andréasson J, Bergström S, Carlsson B, Graham LP, Lindström G (2004) Hydrological change – climate change impact simulations for Sweden. Ambio 33:228–234
Google Scholar - Arnell NW (1996) Global warming, river: flows and water resources. Wiley, Chichester
Google Scholar - Arnell NW, Reynard NS, King RS, Prudhomme C, Branson J (1997) Effects of climate change on river flows and groundwater recharge: guidelines for resource assessment. Report to UKWIR/Environment Agency; 55 pp C annexes
- Berg AA, Famiglietti JS, Walker JP, Houser PR (2003) Impact of bias correction to reanalysis products on simulations of North American soil moisture and hydrological fluxes. J Geophys Res 108(D16):4490. doi:10.1029/2002JD003334
Article Google Scholar - Bergström S, Andréasson J, Beldring S, Carlsson B, Graham LP, Jónsdóttir JF, Engeland K, Turunen MA, Vehviläinen B, and Førland EJ (2003) Climate change impacts on hydropower in the Nordic countries – state of the art and discussion of principles. Rejkjavik, Iceland, CWE Hydrological Models Group: 36
- Boe J, Terray L, Habets F, Martin E (2007) Statistical and dynamical downscaling of the Seine basin climate for hydro-meteorological studies. Int J Climatol 27:1643–1655
Article Google Scholar - Collins WD et al (2006) The Community Climate System Model version 3 (CCSM3). Climate 19:2122–2143
Article Google Scholar - Cubasch U, von Storch H, Waszkewitz J, Zorita E (1996) Estimates of climate change in Southern Europe derived from dynamical climate model output. Climate Res 7:129–149
Article Google Scholar - Deque M (2007) Frequency of precipitation and temperature extremes over France in an anthropogenic scenario: model results and statistical correction according to observed values. Glob Planet Chang 57:16–26. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.11.030
Article Google Scholar - Ek MB et al (2003) Implementation of Noah land surface model advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational mesoscale Eta model. J Geophys Res 108(D22):8851. doi:10.1029/2002JD003296
Article Google Scholar - Gellens D, Roulin E (1998) river flow response of Belgian catchments to IPCC climate change scenarios. J Hydrol 210:242–258
Article Google Scholar - Gleick PH (1986) Methods for evaluating the regional hydrologic effects of global climate changes. J Hydrol 88:97–116
Article Google Scholar - Graham LP (2004) Climate change effects on river flow to the Baltic Sea. Ambio 33:235–241
Google Scholar - Graham LP, Andréasson J, Carlsson B (2007a) Assessing climate change impacts on hydrology from an ensemble of regional climate models, model scales and linking methods – a case study on the Lule River Basin. Clim Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9215-2
- Graham LP, Hageman S, Jaun S, Beniston M (2007b) On interpreting hydrological change from regional climate models. Clim Change 81:97–122
Article Google Scholar - Guan H, Wilson JL, Makhnin O (2005) Geostatistical mapping of mountain precipitation incorporating autosearched effects of terrain and climatic characteristics. J Hydrometeorol 6:1018–1031
Article Google Scholar - Guan H, Wilson JL, Xie H (2009) A cluster-optimizing regression-based approach for precipitation spatial downscaling in mountainous terrain. J Hydrol 375:578–588. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.07.007
Article Google Scholar - Jayakrishnan R, Srinivasan R, Arnold GJ (2004) Comparison of rain gauge and WSR-88D Stage III precipitation data over the Texas-Gulf basin. J Hydrol 292:135–152
Article Google Scholar - Jiang X, Wiedinmyer C, Chen F, Yang Z-L, Lo JC-F (2008) Predicted impacts of climate and land use change on surface ozone in the Houston, Texas, area. J Geophys Res 113:D20312. doi:10.1029/2008JD009820
Article Google Scholar - Krajewski WF, Smith JA (2002) Radar hydrology: precipitation estimation. Adv Water Resour 25:1387–1394
Article Google Scholar - Lettenmaier DP, Wood AW, Palmer RN, Wood EF, Stakhiv EZ (1999) Water resources implications of global warming: a US regional perspective. Clim Chang 43:537–579
Article Google Scholar - Lohmann D, Liang X, Wood EF, Lettenmaier DP, Boone A, Chang S, Chen F, Dai Y, Desborough C, Dickinson R, Duan Q, Ek M, Gusev Y, Habets F, Irannejad P, Koster R, Nasanova O, Noilhan J, Schaake J, Schlosser A, Shao Y, Shmakin A, Verseghy D, Wang J, Warrach K, Wetzel P, Xue Y, Yang Z-L, Zeng Q (1998) The Project for Intercomparison of Land-Surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS) phase-2(c) Red-Arkansas River basin experiment: 3. Spatial and temporal analysis of water fluxes. Global Planet Change 19(1–4):161–179
Article Google Scholar - Mearns LO, Bogardi I, Giorgi F, Matyasovzsky I, Palecki M (1999) Comparison of climate change scenarios generated from regional climate model experiments and statistical downscaling. J Geophys Res 104:6603–6621
Article Google Scholar - Meehl GA, Tebaldi C, Walton G, Easterling D, McDaniel L (2009) Relative increase of record high maximum temperatures compared to record low minimum temperatures in the U. S. Geophys Res Lett 36:L23701
Article Google Scholar - Mesinger F et al (2006) North American regional reanalysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 87:343–360
Article Google Scholar - Middelkoop H, Daamen K, Gellens D, Grabs W, Kwadijk JCJ, Lang H, Parmet BWAH, Schädler B, Schulla J, Wilke K (2001) Impact of climate change on hydrological regimes and water resources management in the Rhine Basin. Clim Change 49:105–128
Article Google Scholar - Prudhomme N, Reynard SC (2002) Downscaling of global, climate models for flood frequency analysis: where are we now? Hydrol Process 16:1137–1150
Article Google Scholar - Reichle RH, Koster RD (2004) Bias reduction in short records of satellite soil moisture. Geophys Res Lett 31:L19501. doi:10.1029/2004GL020938
Article Google Scholar - Rosero E, Gulden LE, Yang Z-L, De Goncalves LG, Niu G-Y, Kaheil YH (2011) Ensemble evaluation of hydrologically enhanced Noah-LSM: partitioning of the water balance in high-resolution simulations over the Little Washita River experimental watershed. J Hydrometeor 12:45–64
Article Google Scholar - Seager R, Ting M, Held I, Kushnir Y, Lu J, Vecchi G, Huang HP, Harnik N, Lau NC, Li C, Velez J, Naik N (2007) Model projections on an inminent transition to a more arid climate in southwestern North America. Science 316:1181–1184
Article Google Scholar - Skamarock WC, Klemp JB, Dudhia J, Gill DO, Barker DM, Wang W, Powers JG (2005) A description of the advanced research WRF version 2. NCAR Tech Notes-468+STR
- Smith JB, Pitts G (1997) Regional climate change scenarios for vulnerability and adaptation assessments. Clim Chang 36:3–21
Article Google Scholar - Smith JA, Seo DJ, Baeck ML, Hudlow MD (1996) An intercomparison study of NEXRAD precipitation estimates. Water Resour Res 32:2035–2045
Article Google Scholar - Wang X, Xie H, Sharif H, Zeitler J (2008) Validating NEXRDA MPE and Stage III precipitation products for uniform precipitation on the Upper Guadalupe River Basin of the Texas Hill country. J Hydrol 348(1–2):73–86. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.09.057
Article Google Scholar - Wood AW, Leung LR, Sridhar V, Lettenmaier DP (2004) Hydrologic implications of dynamical and statistical approaches to downscaling climate model outputs. Clim Chang 62:189–216
Article Google Scholar - Xie H, Zhou X, Hendrickx J, Vivoni E, Guan H, Tian Y, Small E (2006) Evaluation of NEXRAD Stage III precipitation data over semiarid region. J Am Water Resour Assoc 42(1):237–256
Article Google Scholar - Young CB, Nelson BR, Bradley AA, Krajewski WF, Kruger A, Morrissey ML (2000) Evaluating NEXRAD multisensor precipitation estimates for operational hydrologic forecasting. J Hydrometeorol 1:241–254
Article Google Scholar
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NASA IDS Grants (NNX07AL79G and NNX11AE42G). Xiaoyan Jiang provided downscaled WRF output. We thank insightful discussions with David Gochis at The National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). We are grateful for the constructive comments from the reviewers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
- Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 7 Nanhai Road, Qingdao, 266071, PR China
Yongsheng Xu - Department of Geological Sciences, The John A. and Katherine G. Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712-0254, USA
Yongsheng Xu & Zong-Liang Yang
Authors
- Yongsheng Xu
- Zong-Liang Yang
Corresponding author
Correspondence toYongsheng Xu.
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Physically-based parsimonious multivariate-regression algorithm
Physically-based parsimonious multivariate-regression algorithm is an statistical algorithm used to downscale low-resolution spatial precipitation fields (Guan et al. [2009](/article/10.1007/s10584-011-0366-4#ref-CR17 "Guan H, Wilson JL, Xie H (2009) A cluster-optimizing regression-based approach for precipitation spatial downscaling in mountainous terrain. J Hydrol 375:578–588. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.07.007
")). This algorithm auto-searches precipitation spatial structures (rain-pixel clusters), and orographic effects on precipitation distribution without prior knowledge of atmospheric setting. It is composed of three components: rain-pixel clustering, multivariate regression, and random cascade. The first step is clustering, which separate the rain pixels into different clusters by rain rates and their spatial connections, because the storm structure and the associated physical processes are believed to be more similar within one raining pixel cluster than between clusters. The second step is to examine alternative cluster structures, and find the one having the best agreement between the regression estimates and the original NEXRAD pixel values. For all identified clusters, ASOADeK regression \[Guan et al. [2009](/article/10.1007/s10584-011-0366-4#ref-CR17 "Guan H, Wilson JL, Xie H (2009) A cluster-optimizing regression-based approach for precipitation spatial downscaling in mountainous terrain. J Hydrol 375:578–588. doi:
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.07.007
"), [2005](/article/10.1007/s10584-011-0366-4#ref-CR16 "Guan H, Wilson JL, Makhnin O (2005) Geostatistical mapping of mountain precipitation incorporating autosearched effects of terrain and climatic characteristics. J Hydrometeorol 6:1018–1031")\] is applied,P=bo+b1X+b2Y+b3XY+b4X2+b5Y2+b6Z+b7cosalpha+b8sinalphaP = {b_o} + {b_1}X + {b_2}Y + {b_3}XY + {b_4}{X^2} + {b_5}{Y^2} + {b_6}Z + {b_7}\cos \alpha + {b_8}\sin \alphaP=bo+b_1X+b_2Y+b_3XY+b_4X2+b_5Y2+b_6Z+b_7cosalpha+b_8sinalpha
where P is precipitation rate, X is the longitudinal geographic coordinate, Y is the latitudinal coordinate, Z is the elevation, α is the terrain aspect, and the b i are fitted coefficients. After regression, the sum of precipitation for the small pixels (calculated from the regression function) is compared to the original large pixel value, and their correlation coefficient is calculated for each cluster and assigned to each large pixel and small pixels within the cluster. Guan et al. ([2009](/article/10.1007/s10584-011-0366-4#ref-CR17 "Guan H, Wilson JL, Xie H (2009) A cluster-optimizing regression-based approach for precipitation spatial downscaling in mountainous terrain. J Hydrol 375:578–588. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.07.007
")) demonstrated the good performance of the algorithm for downscaling NEXRAD precipitation at both daily and hourly temporal resolutions for the northern New Mexico mountainous terrain and the central Texas Hill Country.Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, Y., Yang, ZL. A method to study the impact of climate change on variability of river flow: an example from the Guadalupe River in Texas.Climatic Change 113, 965–979 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0366-4
- Received: 08 September 2010
- Accepted: 16 November 2011
- Published: 29 March 2012
- Issue date: August 2012
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0366-4