Hepamet Fibrosis Score in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Patients in Mexico: Lower than Expected Positive Predictive Value (original) (raw)

Abstract

Background

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been associated with different negative outcomes in the presence of advanced fibrosis. The Hepamet Fibrosis Score (HFS), a recently described noninvasive score, has shown excellent performance for the detection of advanced fibrosis. The aim of this study was to assess its performance in a Mexican population with NAFLD.

Methods

This was a retrospective cross-sectional study performed in 222 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD, of whom 33(14%) had advanced fibrosis. We retrieved clinical data from each patient’s medical record to compute the HFS, the NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS), and the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), and assess their performance.

Results

When considering the models as continuous variables, the area under the receiving operating characteristics curve of the HFS(0.758) was not different from that of the NFS(0.669, p = 0.09) or FIB-4(0.796, p = 0.1). The HFS had a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 76.7% (95% CI 57.7–90.1), 90.1% (95% CI 85–93.9), 36.7% (95% CI 19.9–56.1), and 94.3% (95% CI 88.5–97.7), respectively. Indeterminate results (i.e., gray area) were more common with FIB-4 and HFS when compared with NFS [139(63%) and 122(55%) vs 80(36%), p < 0.001]. The variables that were associated with misclassification using the HFS were diabetes [OR 3.40 (95% CI 1.42–8.10), p = 0.006] and age [OR 1.06 (95% CI 1.01–1.11), p = 0.01].

Conclusion

The HFS showed sensitivity and specificity similar to that reported in the original publication; however, the positive predictive value was 36.7% at a pretest probability of 14%. The role of the HFS in prospective studies and in combination with other methods should be further explored.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Younossi Z, Tacke F, Arrese M, et al. Global perspectives on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2019;69:2672–2682. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.30251.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Dick AA, Spitzer AL, Seifert CF, et al. Liver transplantation at the extremes of the body mass index. Liver Transpl. 2009;15:968–977. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.21785.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  3. OECD. Oaoaa in Health at a Glance 2017: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1787/health_glance-2017-en.
    Book Google Scholar
  4. Briseno-Bass P, Chavez-Perez R, Lopez-Zendejas M. Prevalence of hepatic steatosis and its relation to liver function tests and lipid profile in patients at medical check-up. Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2019;84:290–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgmx.2018.05.007.
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. 2016;64:73–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.28431.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Younossi ZM. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease—a global public health perspective. J Hepatol. 2019;70:531–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2018.10.033.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Leoni S, Tovoli F, Napoli L, Serio I, Ferri S, Bolondi L. Current guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review with comparative analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24:3361–3373. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i30.3361.
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  8. Ampuero J, Pais R, Aller R, et al. Development and validation of hepamet fibrosis scoring system-a simple, noninvasive test to identify patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with advanced fibrosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18:e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2019.05.051.
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Angulo P, Hui JM, Marchesini G, et al. The NAFLD fibrosis score: a noninvasive system that identifies liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. Hepatology. 2007;45:846–854. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.21496.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Sterling RK, Lissen E, Clumeck N, et al. Development of a simple noninvasive index to predict significant fibrosis in patients with HIV/HCV coinfection. Hepatology. 2006;43:1317–1325. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.21178.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van Natta M, et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2005;41:1313–1321. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.20701.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Bujang MA, Adnan TH. Requirements for minimum sample size for sensitivity and specificity analysis. J Clin Diagn Res.. 2016;10:YE01–YE06. https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2016/18129.8744.
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  13. Ampuero JAR, Gallego-Duran R, et al. PS-200-The combination of HEPAmet fibrosis score and transient elastography shows a high diagnostic accuracy in predicting advanced fibrosis in NAFLD. J Hepatol. 2019;70:E133–E134.
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Ciardullo S, Monti T, Sala I, Grassi G, Mancia G, Perseghin G. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and advanced fibrosis in us adults across blood pressure categories. Hypertension. 2020;76:562–568. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15220.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Ampuero J, Aller R, Gallego-Duran R, et al. Significant fibrosis predicts new-onset diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension in patients with NASH. J Hepatol. 2020;73:17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2020.02.028.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Singh S, Allen AM, Wang Z, Prokop LJ, Murad MH, Loomba R. Fibrosis progression in nonalcoholic fatty liver vs nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of paired-biopsy studies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13:643–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2014.04.014.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital General de México Dr. Eduardo Liceaga, Dr. Balmis 148, Colonia Doctores, Alcaldía Cuauhtémoc, 06720, Mexico City, Mexico
    Fátima Higuera-de-la-Tijera
  2. Hepatology Division, Hospital General “Dr. Manuel GEA González”, Calz. de Tlalpan 4800, Colonia Belisario Domínguez Secc 16, Alcaldía Tlalpan, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico
    Jacqueline Córdova-Gallardo
  3. Departamento de Gastroenterología, Centro Médico Nacional 20 de Noviembre, Félix Cuevas 540, Colonia del Valle Sur, Alcaldía Benito Juárez, 03229, Mexico City, Mexico
    Elizabeth Buganza-Torio & Beatriz Barranco-Fragoso
  4. Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán. Vasco de Quiroga 15, Colonia Belisario Domínguez Secc 16, Alcaldía Tlalpan, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico
    Aldo Torre, Graciela Castro-Narro & Carlos Moctezuma-Velazquez
  5. Pathology Division, Hospital General “Dr. Manuel GEA González”, Calz. de Tlalpan 4800, Colonia Belisario Domínguez Secc 16, Alcaldía Tlalpan, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico
    Sara Parraguirre-Martínez
  6. Bariatric Surgery Division, Surgery Service, Hospital General “Dr. Manuel GEA González”, Calz. de Tlalpan 4800, Colonia Belisario Domínguez Secc 16, Alcaldía Tlalpan, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico
    Martin Edgardo Rojano-Rodríguez
  7. Department of Pathology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
    Gabriel Quintero-Bustos

Authors

  1. Fátima Higuera-de-la-Tijera
  2. Jacqueline Córdova-Gallardo
  3. Elizabeth Buganza-Torio
  4. Beatriz Barranco-Fragoso
  5. Aldo Torre
  6. Sara Parraguirre-Martínez
  7. Martin Edgardo Rojano-Rodríguez
  8. Gabriel Quintero-Bustos
  9. Graciela Castro-Narro
  10. Carlos Moctezuma-Velazquez

Corresponding author

Correspondence toCarlos Moctezuma-Velazquez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Higuera-de-la-Tijera, F., Córdova-Gallardo, J., Buganza-Torio, E. et al. Hepamet Fibrosis Score in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Patients in Mexico: Lower than Expected Positive Predictive Value.Dig Dis Sci 66, 4501–4507 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06821-2

Download citation

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Fátima Higuera-de-la-Tijera View author profile
  2. Carlos Moctezuma-Velazquez View author profile